scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Fusion Revision: A Technique Guide

10.14444/8037 ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 8037
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Cognetti ◽  
Anton Y. Jorgensen
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 1324-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Schoell ◽  
Zorica Buser ◽  
Andre Jakoi ◽  
Martin Pham ◽  
Neil N. Patel ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. S363
Author(s):  
Kyle Schoell ◽  
Zorica Buser ◽  
Andre Jakoi ◽  
Martin H. Pham ◽  
Neil N. Patel ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0036-1582972-s-0036-1582972
Author(s):  
Kyle Schoell ◽  
Zorica Buser ◽  
Andre Jakoi ◽  
Martin Pham ◽  
Neil Patel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 574-577
Author(s):  
Mazda K. Turel ◽  
Mena Kerolus ◽  
Harel Deutsch

ABSTRACTSacroiliac fusion and instrumentation extension for correction of failed lumbosacral fusions traditionally requires a long revision surgery. Reopening of the prior surgical incision to expose the prior instrumentation requires a large incision with increased blood loss, increased operative time, increased risk of infection, and longer hospitalization times. We describe the first case series using a minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac screw technique for extension of a prior fusion to the pelvis. Using two small 3-cm paramedian incisions on each side, we were able to obtain autologous iliac crest bone graft, place the sacroiliac screw minimally invasive, perform an arthrodesis, and connect the prior surgical hardware to the sacroiliac screw safely. A detailed review of surgical technique, clinical cases, and brief review of the literature is discussed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. S146-S147
Author(s):  
Derek P. Lindsey ◽  
Luis Perez-Orribo ◽  
Nestor Rodriguez-Martinez ◽  
Phillip Reyes ◽  
Anna G. Newcomb ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (13) ◽  
pp. 169-176
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Evangelista ◽  
James L. Coyle

Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of death from cancer worldwide. Esophageal resection is the mainstay treatment for cancers of the esophagus. While curative, surgical resection may result in swallowing difficulties that require intervention from speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Minimally invasive surgical procedures for esophageal resection have aimed to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with more invasive techniques. Both intra-operative and post-operative complications, regardless of the surgical approach, can result in dysphagia. This article will review the epidemiological impact of esophageal cancers, operative complications resulting in dysphagia, and clinical assessment and management of dysphagia pertinent to esophageal resection.


Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Azevedo Ziomkowski ◽  
João Rafael Silva Simões Estrela ◽  
Nilo Jorge Carvalho Leão Barretto ◽  
Nilo César Leão Barretto

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 310-310
Author(s):  
Shu-Keung Li ◽  
Chun-wing Wong ◽  
Dominic Tai ◽  
Lysander Chau ◽  
Berry Fung ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document