The Report to the Union of National Economic Association in Japan on JAFEE and EIER (2010)

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-136
Author(s):  
Yuji Aruka
Keyword(s):  
Economic Association ◽  
National Economic ◽  
National Economic Association

The National Economic Association at 50: Where Have We Come From and Where Are We Going?

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-124
Author(s):  
Margaret C. Simms
Keyword(s):  
American Economic Association ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Economic Association ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
National Economic Association ◽  
Black Economists

The National Economic Association was founded as the Caucus of Black Economists in 1969. The organization was formed to address the underrepresentation of Black economists in the American Economic Association and in the profession at large. This article reviews key issues raised and how they were addressed. It also makes suggestions for future directions the NEA might take.

50 Years of Power and the Influence of the National Economic Association: Black Economist Contributions to Economics Profession

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-117
Author(s):  
Omari H. Swinton
Keyword(s):  
Annual Meeting ◽  
Black Economist ◽  
The Past ◽  
Economic Association ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Economics Profession ◽  
National Economic Association ◽  
The Way

The National Economic Association (NEA) president addresses the membership body at the annual meeting. He reflects on the past presidents of the organization and their accomplishments. He then addresses his path through the NEA from a child to the president of the organization and the assistance that many provided along the way.

The National Economic Association at 50: Getting Back to Our Roots

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-159
Author(s):  
Olugbenga Ajilore
Keyword(s):  
Political Economy ◽  
African American ◽  
Black Political Economy ◽  
Presidential Address ◽  
50Th Anniversary ◽  
Economic Association ◽  
National Economic ◽  
National Economic Association ◽  
African American Economists ◽  
Black Economists

The National Economic Association (NEA) started out as the Caucus of Black Economists in December 1969. At the onset of the 50th Anniversary of the NEA’s founding, this presidential address looks at the organization’s past, present, and future to improve the prospects for current and future African American economists. Three recommendations are offered: support The Review of Black Political Economy, the NEA’s journal; help develop regional student chapters; and continue to foster allies that are aligned with the NEA’s mission. The Economics field needs to be better about becoming diverse and inclusive, and the NEA can lead the movement toward those goals.

The Moral Burden on Economists: Darrick Hamilton’s 2017 NEA Presidential Address

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-342
Author(s):  
Darrick Hamilton
Keyword(s):  
Racial Disparity ◽  
Presidential Address ◽  
Limited Attention ◽  
Structural Barriers ◽  
Individual Agency ◽  
Economic Association ◽  
National Economic ◽  
National Economic Association

In his 2017 presidential address to the National Economic Association (NEA), Professor Darrick Hamilton warned that treating economics as a morally neutral “science,” and the discipline’s limited attention to structural barriers and overemphasis individual agency, has resulted in bad economics, and bad policy particularly as it relates to racial disparity.

W. Artur Lewis Lecture: The Lewis Model of “Economic Growth with Unlimited Supplies of Labor”

1988 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles P. Kindleberger
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Third World ◽  
Nobel Laureate ◽  
British West Indies ◽  
Economic Association ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Empirical Trade ◽  
World Economic ◽  
The Caribbean ◽  
Manchester School

The National Economic Association introduced the W. Arthur Lewis Distinguished Lecture series in December 1985. The Lewis Lecture is named in honor of the 1979 Nobel Laureate in Economics, much of whose research has been devoted to the problem of Third World economic development. A native of St. Lucia, in the former British West Indies, Arthur Lewis has risen to fame as the preeminent development economist of his generation. He is most famous for his 1954 Manchester School paper on economic development with unlimited supplies of labor, but his contributions span the fields of industrial organization, public finance, and international trade. He was one of the first to explore in depth the evidence on movements on terms of trade between industrialized and developing countries and was the first to perform a regression analysis in empirical trade research. Lewis was an active advisor to various governments in West Africa, the Caribbean, and Southeast Asia during the development decades. He says that he conceived of the idea of unlimited supplies of labor while on mission in Bangkok, Thailand in 1952. This third lecture in the series, by Professor Charles Kindleberger, examines the broad applicability of the Lewis model. Barbara A. P. Jones 1987 NEA President

Manajemen Ekonomi Outopilot: Kegagalan Negara Mencari Identitas?

Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-152
Author(s):  
Mukhaer Pakkanna
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
National Economy ◽  
The State ◽  
Political Democracy ◽  
Economic Democracy ◽  
Quality Of Democracy ◽  
Economic Disparities ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Production And Distribution

Political democracy should be equivalent to the economic development of the quality of democracy, economic democracy if not upright, even the owner of the ruling power and money, which is parallel to force global corporatocracy. Consequently, the economic oligarchy preservation reinforces control of production and distribution from upstream to downstream and power monopoly of the market. The implication, increasingly sharp economic disparities, exclusive owner of the money and power become fertile, and the end could jeopardize the harmony of the national economy. The loss of national economic identity that makes people feel lost the “pilot of the state”. What happens then is the autopilot state. Viewing unclear direction of the economy, the national economy should clarify the true figure.

Economic Development in 2006 and the Future of the Russian Economy: The Non-Resource-Based Sector Potential (The Economic Report of All-Russia Business Union “Delovaya Rossiya”)

2007 ◽  
pp. 27-45
Author(s):  
B. Titov ◽  
I. Pilipenko ◽  
A. Danilov-Danilyan
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Free Market ◽  
Economic Report ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
The Social ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Investment Capital ◽  
Export Industries ◽  
Sustainable Economic Growth

The report considers how the state economic policy contributes to the national economic development in the midterm perspective. It analyzes main current economic problems of the Russian economy, i.e. low effectiveness of the social system, high dependence on export industries and natural resources, high monopolization and underdeveloped free market, as well as barriers that hinder non-recourse-based business development including high tax burden, skilled labor deficit and lack of investment capital. We propose a social-oriented market economy as the Russian economic model to achieve a sustainable economic growth in the long-term perspective. This model is based on people’s prosperity and therefore expanding domestic demand that stimulates the growth of domestic non-resource-based sector which in turn can accelerate annual GDP growth rates to 10-12%. To realize this model "Delovaya Rossiya" proposes a program that consists of a number of directions and key groups of measures covering priority national projects, tax, fiscal, monetary, innovative-industrial, trade and social policies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document