scholarly journals KEJUJURAN HISTORIS BARAT DAN ISLAM

Jurnal Dakwah ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-284
Author(s):  
Erham Budi Wiranto

In historical relations between the West and the Islamic world, honesty is a rare dimension. The history of West-East relations seems to be filled with bias and covered in prejudice. The negative stigma of the West towards the East, and vice versa, is still being inherited and reproduced today. Sudibyo Markus tries to present an honest and balanced historical analysis in seeing the West and Islam. This paper is a review of Sudibyo Markus' book entitled Dunia Barat dan Islam, Cahaya di Cakrawala (The West and Islam, Light in the Horizon) published by Gramedia in 2019. Dalam sejarah hubungan dunia Barat dan dunia Islam, kejujuran termasuk dimensi yang langka. Sejarah relasi Barat-Timur seolah dipenuhi bias dan berlumuran prasangka. Stigma negatif Barat terhadap Timur, demikian pula sebaliknya, masih terus terwarisi dan direproduksi hingga kini. Sudibyo Markus mencoba menghadirkan analisis sejarah yang jujur dan berimbang dalam melihat Barat dan Islam. Tulisan ini adalah telaah terhadap buku karya Sudibyo Markus berjudul "Dunia Barat dan Islam, Cahaya di Cakrawala" yang diterbitkan oleh Gramedia tahun 2019.

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Rudolph ◽  
Roman Seidel

AbstractThe Argument for God’s Existence is one of the major issues in the history of philosophy. It also constitutes an illuminating example of a shared philosophical problem in the entangled intellectual histories of Europe and the Islamic World. Drawing on Aristotle, various forms of the argument were appropriated by both rational Islamic Theology (kalām) and Islamic philosophers such as Avicenna. Whereas the argument, reshaped, refined and modified, has been intensively discussed throughout the entire post-classical era, particularly in the Islamic East, it has likewise been adopted in the West by thinkers such as the Hebrew Polymath Maimonides and the Medieval Latin Philosopher and Theologian Thomas Aquinas. However, these mutual reception-processes did not end in the middle ages. They can be witnessed in the twentieth century and even up until today: On the one hand, we see a Middle Eastern thinker like the Iranian philosopher Mahdī Ḥāʾirī Yazdī re-evaluating Kant’s fundamental critique of the classical philosophical arguments for God’s existence, in particular of the ontological proof, and refuting the critique. On the other hand, an argument from creation brought forward by the Islamic Theologian and critic of the peripatetic tradition al-Ghazāli has been adopted by a strand of Western philosophers who label their own version “The Kalām-cosmological Argument”. By discussing important cornerstones in the history of the philosophical proof for God’s existence we argue for a re-consideration of current Eurocentric narratives in the history of philosophy and suggest that such a transcultural perspective may also provide inspiration for current philosophical discourses between Europe, the Middle East and beyond.


2021 ◽  
Vol 03 (06) ◽  
pp. 129-140
Author(s):  
Nora REDJATI ◽  
Ameziane WASSILA

With th rise of the Western renaissance in the modern era and the subsequent advanced material civilization The intellectual struggle began between the West and the East, and Western intellectual production began to be concerned with Islam and Islamic heritage, And this production was found among the children of the Islamic world who are fascinated by this Western civilization One of the results of this civilization shock was that the Muslim modernists adopted the views of the Western Orientalists, and these oriental studies contributed to defining the positions of Muslim scholars, As some of them took a stance against the West, and some of them took this break with the Islamic heritage and adopted the positions of the West, And some of them revisited himself after this adoption and examined his assumptions with this thought, even if this examination was late, and this is the case of Muhammad Arkoun. The intellectual works of Muhammad Arkoun were known for their adoption of the approaches and axioms of Western thought, so that he called the group of his ideas what is known as criticism of the Islamic mind Considering that his modernist discourse is the intellectual alternative to the Orientalist discourse in Islamic thought, believing that his epistemological effort is an endeavor to enlighten Islamic thought, From this standpoint, the thought of Muhammad Arkoun faced a lot of criticism in the Islamic intellectual circles, and he was accused that his writings in their entirety are marketing the Orientalist discourse with a modernist vision, In contrast to this Islamic attack on Muhammad Arkoun, the reader may be surprised by his writings, especially the latter, when he finds him showing a kind of criticism of Orientalism, accusing him of shortcomings, and defaming him for the presence of the positivist and philological-linguistic approaches strongly in his studies, If we wish, we would say that Arkoun's recent books contain a desire to transcend the Orientalist discourse. This appears in his books such as: Islamic Thought, Criticism and Ijtihad, Towards a Comparative History of Monotheistic Religions, Islamic Thought, Scientific Reading, History of Arab and Islamic Thought... and other of his writings. Which makes a legitimate question about the nature of the relationship between Arkoun - as a model of the modernist school - with Orientalism. And about the real reasons that made him stand in a controversial position, Once, the Orientalist discourse adopts its evaluative approach and vision of the Islamic heritage, Once he criticizes him, accuses his approach of sterility, and blames him for failing to find solutions to the problems in which the Islamic world is stumbling.


1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-388
Author(s):  
Mehdi Aminrazavai

As pluralistic societies in the West become the nonn and the "globalvillage" becomes a reality, ecumenical dialogues gain prominence.Ecumenical dialogues, which, like many other discussions, first beganamong scholars as an exclusively academic activity, now take place inchurches, corrununities, and other sociopolitical organizations. In theUnited States, in particular, attempts are being made to introduce educationalcurricula that are sensitive to the culture and religious orientations ofminorities.The very feasibility of a Christian-Muslim dialogue should be calledinto question. Can the Islamic world enter into a dialogue with the secularWest? Any dialogue or discourse requires a corrunon language, a sharedworldview, and some basic agreement on some of the fundamental axiomsaround which a worldview is formed. I fear that the Islamic world and theWest no longer have such a common language.In the present discussion, I will offer an analysis and interpretation ofMuslim-Christian dialogue that calls for a reflection on the readiness ofMuslims to have a meaningful dialogue with the West. I argue that the necessarycondition for a meaningful dialogue between traditional Islam andthe secular West does not exist and, therefore, that any attempt to do so atthis time either will not succeed or will become a superficial survey of whatwe have in common, such as the Ten Commandments. To elucidate, I willfirst offer a model of a successful dialogue between Muslims and Christiansbased on the medieval philosophical dialogue between Muslim and Christianphilosophers. I will then apply the conclusions drawn from this modelto contemporary attempts at such ecumenical dialogues.Any student of medieval philosophy can observe two distinct periodsin the history of medieval philosophy, defined here as early and later,each of which has distinct characteristics. The early period belongs to theChurch fathers who laid the groundwork for Christian philosophical andtheological frameworks. Early Christian philosophical writings of suchfigures as Augustine, Boethius, John Scotus, St. Anselm, Peter Abaillard,and others were responses to specific questions of an intellectual nature ...


1959 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayden V. White

It is a distinguishing feature of modern Western historical thought that it has striven self-consciously to free itself from the use of non-historical categories of explanation in order to consitute itself as an autonomous, self-explanatory and self-justifying form of thought. Croce believed this movement to be a late phase of humanism and identified it as the main ingredient in the Western intellectual tradition. In his view, the history of historiography in the West has been one long struggle to expel the category of transcendence from historical analysis, that is, a struggle of history against philosophy of history.Unlike modern historical thought with its value free orientation, most previous historiography has been informed, either consciously or unconsciously, by a specific set of social values and has used historical materials as either a mine of examples for support of the position pre-chosen (like Cicero) or as evidence for the study of phenomena the noumena of which lie just outside the range of history proper (like Marx). The former approach never really arrives at history, the latter passes through it too rapidly to the goal which it believes lies beyond it. In so far as most previous historiography has been governed by these two tendencies, it has always been philosophy of history rather than history proper.


Al-Albab ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Sahide

The Crusade is an important part of the history of Islamic thought, development, culture and civilization. The Crusade which changed the path of human historical development, especially of the Islamic world, had a major influence on the encounter between the West and the East (the Islamic world) today. By understanding the history, the Crusade, we can find the correlation of the hegemony of the Western countries, especially between the United States and the Islamic world today, especially in the Middle the East region. the Western presence in all aspects of life of the contemporary Islamic world, which is far left behind, has historical relevance of the Crusade. This paper seeks to review the Crusade and its influence on the development of the contemporary Islamic world and the West.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 639
Author(s):  
Bayram Demircigil

<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>The relationships between Islam and the West that has been become high on the agenda for the Islamic world and for our country throughout the last two centuries. It seems that this phenemonen will remain for a long time. Therefore, this topic is one of the major issues that needs to be analyzed extensively because it is mainly concerned with our country’s and Islamic world’s future. The author İbrahim Kalın addressed the historical account of the relationships between Islam and the West quite competently in his book titled “Islam and the West”. The major theme of this work is the way of thinking that there is still a common ground between the two civilisations which have a long history of conflicts, consequently the possibility of creating a peaceful atmosphere between both still exists.</p><p>We could argue that one of the objectives that the author aimed to accomplish through this book is to provide an intellectual basis for the relations between Islam and the West as well as making a contribution to promoting and developing a dialog and reconcilitation between Muslims and the West. However, it might be an accurate conclusion that the general situation presented or suggestions made by depending on a few good examples in this book rely to a large extent on wishful thinking when we take into consideration that the relations between the two civilisations are based predominantly on prejudice, hostility and aggression along the history. Indeed, the author himself admits this fact in some of the phrases of the book. </p><p><strong>Öz</strong></p><p>İslam dünyasının, özellikle de ülkemizin birkaç asırdır gündemini meşgul eden ve bundan sonra da meşgul edecek gibi görünen İslam-Batı ilişkilerinin doğru ve objektif biçimde derinlemesine ele alınması gerekmektedir. Zira bu konu, İslam dünyasının ve ülkemizin geleceğini çok yakından ilgilendirmektedir. Bu bakımdan, İbrahim Kalın’ın söz konusu eseri büyük önem arz etmektedir. Bu eserin ana temasını, uzun bir tarihi geçmişi olan ve büyük çapta anlaşmazlıklar ve çatışmalar silsilesinden oluşan İslam-Batı ilişkilerinde bazı uzlaşı noktalarının da bulunduğu ve ikisi arasında sağlıklı bir diyalog zemininin oluşturulmasının mümkün olduğu, dolayısıyla bu iki medeniyet arasındaki kavga halinin aslında kaçınılmaz bir durumu yansıtmadığı düşüncesi oluşturmaktadır. Bu temelden hareketle yazar, eserinde İslam ve Batı arasındaki ilişkiler için entelektüel bir zemin oluşturmayı ve iki medeniyet arasında diyalog ve barış ortamının geliştirilmesine katkı sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.</p><p>İbrahim Kalın’ın birkaç örnekten yola çıkarak iki medeniyet arasında bir uzlaşı zemini oluşturulması yönündeki çabasının, aktüel durum dikkate alındığında, pek gerçekçi görünmediği ve bir temenniden ibaret kalacağı söylenebilir. Aslında yazar da satır aralarında bu gerçeği itiraf etmektedir. Bununla birlikte yazarın tarihsel süreç içinde İslam-Batı ilişkilerini güzel bir üslupla ele aldığı böyle bir çalışma, bir iyi niyet göstergesi olarak son derece değerlidir.</p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-99
Author(s):  
Hamad al-Humaidhi

Ṣulḥ, the basis of dispute resolution in the Arab world, is governed not only by rules of law and legal process. Relational factors and the notion of collective interests such as family, tribe, community, country, religion, and race, also come into play. Harmony within the culture is perceived as a duty on its members, including third-party interveners: i.e., a judge, arbitrator, or conciliator. For this reason, regional implementation of alternative dispute resolution techniques should take into consideration collective interests as well as ṣulḥ as core of the Islamic system in order to resolve the dispute while maintaining familial, religious, and community ties. This article discusses the history of ṣulḥ, its foundations and implementation within the Arab–Islamic region. The conclusion will draw a distinction between the Arab view of ṣulḥ versus alternative dispute resolution in the West.


2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-268
Author(s):  
R. J. CLEEVELY

A note dealing with the history of the Hawkins Papers, including the material relating to John Hawkins (1761–1841) presented to the West Sussex Record Office in the 1960s, recently transferred to the Cornwall County Record Office, Truro, in order to be consolidated with the major part of the Hawkins archive held there. Reference lists to the correspondence of Sibthorp-Hawkins, Hawkins-Sibthorp, and Hawkins to his mother mentioned in The Flora Graeca story (Lack, 1999) are provided.


2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-358
Author(s):  
WEN-CHIN OUYANG

I begin my exploration of ‘Ali Mubarak (1823/4–1893) and the discourses on modernization ‘performed’ in his only attempt at fiction, ‘Alam al-Din (The Sign of Religion, 1882), with a quote from Guy Davenport because it elegantly sums up a key theoretical principle underpinning any discussion of cultural transformation and, more particularly, of modernization. Locating ‘Ali Mubarak and his only fictional work at the juncture of the transformation from the ‘traditional’ to the ‘modern’ in the recent history of Arab culture and of Arabic narrative, I find Davenport's pronouncement tantalizingly appropriate. He not only places the stakes of history and geography in one another, but simultaneously opens up the imagination to the combined forces of time and space that stand behind these two distinct yet related disciplines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document