Obojętność i nie-działanie jako przedmiot moralnej oceny
To evaluate non-acting involves more theoretical problems than to estimate actions. There is a full range of possible solutions of this question. The extreme ones are presented, on the one hand, by consequentialism that denies the difference between action and non-acting if their results are the same; and, on the other, by negative utilitarianism, that is based on the literal interpretation of the rule “Do not do the evil” that says nothing about non-acting. There is, of course, intermediary proposition held by moderated versions of absolutistic ethics and utilitarianism which, both, assert the responsibility for non-acting but differentiate it from the responsibility for actions.
1998 ◽
Vol 30
(04)
◽
pp. 1027-1057
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
1939 ◽
Vol 170
(941)
◽
pp. 266-271
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2019 ◽
Vol 23
(5)
◽
pp. 2339-2350
◽
Keyword(s):