scholarly journals Impact of respiratory motion on liver stiffness measurements according to different shear wave elastography techniques and region of interest methods: a phantom study

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-114
Author(s):  
Jee Hyeon Lee ◽  
Sang Min Lee ◽  
Jeong Hee Yoon ◽  
Min-Jeong Kim ◽  
Hong Il Ha ◽  
...  
Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 795
Author(s):  
Mauro Giuffrè ◽  
Michela Giuricin ◽  
Deborah Bonazza ◽  
Natalia Rosso ◽  
Pablo José Giraudi ◽  
...  

Background: Obesity is a primary limiting factor in liver stiffness measurement (LSM). The impact of obesity has always been evaluated in terms of body mass index (BMI), without studying the effects of skin-to-liver distance (SLD) on LSM. We studied the impact of SLD on LSM in a cohort of obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery and intra-operatory liver biopsy. Materials and Methods: 299 patients underwent LSM by point-shear wave elastography (ElastPQ protocol), with two different ultrasound machines. SLD was measured as the distance between the skin and the liver capsule, perpendicular to where the region of interest (ROI) was positioned. We used the following arbitrary cut-offs: <5.7 kPa, F0–1; 5.7–7.99 kPa, F2; ≥8 kPa, F3–4. Results: We developed two logistic regression models using elastography–histology agreement (EHA) as the dependent variable and SLD as the independent variable. The model based on the second machine showed strongly more performant discriminative and calibration metrics (AIC 38.5, BIC 44.2, Nagelkerke Pseudo-R2 0.894, AUROC 0.90). The SLD cut-off value of 34.5 mm allowed a correct EHA with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 93%, negative predictive value of 100%, positive predictive value of 87%, an accuracy of 96%, and positive likelihood ratio of 3.56. Conclusion: The impact of SLD is machine-dependent and should be taken into consideration when interpreting LSM. We believe that our findings may serve as a reference point for appropriate fibrosis stratification by liver elastography in obese patients.


Author(s):  
Anders Batman Mjelle ◽  
Anesa Mulabecirovic ◽  
Roald Flesland Havre ◽  
Edda Jonina Olafsdottir ◽  
Odd Helge Gilja ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Liver elastography is increasingly being applied in screening for and follow-up of pediatric liver disease, and has been shown to correlate well with fibrosis staging through liver biopsy. Because time is of the essence when examining children, we wanted to evaluate if a reliable result can be achieved with fewer acquisitions. Materials and Methods 243 healthy children aged 4–17 years were examined after three hours of fasting. Participants were divided into four age groups: 4–7 years; 8–11 years; 12–14 years and 15–17 years. Both two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE; GE Logiq E9) and point shear wave elastography (pSWE; Samsung RS80A with Prestige) were performed in all participants, while transient elastography (TE, Fibroscan) was performed in a subset of 87 children aged 8–17 years. Median liver stiffness measurement (LSM) values of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 acquisitions were compared with the median value of 10 acquisitions (reference standard). Comparison was performed for all participants together as well as within every specific age group. We investigated both the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with absolute agreement and all outliers more than 10 %, 20 % or ≥ 0.5 or 1.0 kPa from the median of 10 acquisitions. Results For all three systems there was no significant difference between three and ten acquisitions, with ICCs ≥ 0.97. All systems needed 4 acquisitions to achieve no LSM deviating ≥ 1.0 kPa of a median of ten. To achieve no LSM deviating ≥ 20 % of a median of ten acquisitions, pSWE and TE needed 4 acquisitions, while 2D-SWE required 6 acquisitions. Conclusion Our results contradict recommendations of 10 acquisitions for pSWE and TE and only 3 for 2D-SWE.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Lupșor-Platon ◽  
Radu Badea ◽  
Mirela Gersak ◽  
Anca Maniu ◽  
Ioana Rusu ◽  
...  

There has been great interest in the development of non-invasive techniques for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases, including ultrasound elastographic methods. Some of these methods have already been adequately studied for the non-invasive assessment of diffuse liver diseases. Others, however, such as two-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography (SWE), of more recent appearance, have yet to be validated and some aspects are for the moment incompletely elucidated. This review discusses some of the aspects related to two-dimensional SWE: the examination technique, the examination performance indicators, intra and interobserver agreement and clinical applications. Recommendations for a high-quality examination technique are formulated. Key words:  –  –  – Two-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography. Abbreviations: 2D- SWE: Two-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography; 3D- SWE: Three-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography; AUROC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curves; ARFI Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography; EFSUMB: European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; HVPG: hepatic venous pressure gradient; LS: liver stiffness; LR: likelihood ratio; NPV: negative predictive value; PPV: positive predictive value; ROI: region of interest; RT-E: Real Time-Elastography; Se: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; TE: Transient Elastography; US: ultrasound; VM: valid measurement; E: Young’s modulus


Endocrine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Corica ◽  
Antonio Bottari ◽  
Tommaso Aversa ◽  
Letteria Anna Morabito ◽  
Selenia Curatola ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 3151-3174 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Widman ◽  
E Maksuti ◽  
D Larsson ◽  
M W Urban ◽  
A Bjällmark ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 402-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Golo Petzold ◽  
Melissa Porsche ◽  
Volker Ellenrieder ◽  
Steffen Kunsch ◽  
Albrecht Neesse

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paraskevi Galina ◽  
Efthymia Alexopoulou ◽  
Aglaia Zellos ◽  
Virginia Grigoraki ◽  
Tania Siahanidou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
Danijela Zjačić Puljiz ◽  
Ivana Kristina Delić Jukić ◽  
Marko Puljiz ◽  
Lučana Vicelić Čutura ◽  
Iva Jerčić Martinić-Cezar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document