Assessment of Confinement Models and Minimum Volumetric Ratio for Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Concrete Circular Columns

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced

Simulation Behavior of Flexure in Reinforced Concrete Beam with Opening Reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)

2016 ◽  
Vol 857 ◽  
pp. 421-425
Author(s):  
Saif M. Thabet ◽  
S.A. Osman
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Concrete Beam ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Beam ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced

This paper presents an investigation into the flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete beam with opening reinforced with two different materials i.e., steel and Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP). Comparison study between the two different materials were carried out and presented in this study through non-linear Finite Element Method (FEM) using the commercial ABAQUS 6.10 software package. The performance of the opening beam reinforced with GFRP is influenced by several key parameters. Simulation analyses were carried out to determine the behavior of beam with opening subjected to monotonic loading. The main parameters considered in this study are size of opening and reinforcement diameter. The results show that GFRP give 23%-29% more ductility than steel reinforcement. The result also shows when the size of opening change from 200mm to 150mm or from 150mm to 100mm the ultimate load capacity increase by 15%. In general, good agreement between the Finite Element (FE) simulation and the available experimental result has been obtained.

Tension stiffening and cracking of concrete reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars

2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter H Bischoff ◽  
Richard Paixao
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Crack Spacing ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Tension Stiffening ◽  
Gfrp Bars ◽  
Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced

Tension stiffening and cracking of axial tension members is evaluated for concrete reinforced with steel (reinforcing ratio ρ = 2.0%) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars (1.3%, 2.0%, and 2.9%), with shrinkage included in the analysis of the member response. Results show that because of a lower bar stiffness the GFRP-reinforced concrete exhibits greater tension stiffening than steel-reinforced concrete for any given value of axial member strain. Transverse cracking in the GFRP-reinforced concrete does not stabilize until much higher values of axial strain are reached, and longitudinal splitting cracks are also evident before cracking has stabilized. Crack widths in concrete reinforced with GFRP bars are larger because of their lower bar stiffness in combination with an increased crack spacing during the crack development stage. Tension stiffening of cracked reinforced concrete is taken into account using an average stress-strain response with a descending branch to model the concrete in tension. A tension stiffening factor is used to characterize this tensile property with an empirical relationship related to the reinforcing bar stiffness and independent of both concrete strength and reinforcing ratio. Results are also compared with the predicted member response based on the 1978 Comité Euro-International du Béton (CEB) CEB-FIP model code approach and American Concrete Institute (ACI) method of using an effective cracked section property for the transformed concrete area. This comparison shows that both methods are valid only for a limited range of reinforcing ratios.Key words: cracking, crack spacing, crack width, GFRP, reinforced concrete, tension stiffening.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document