scholarly journals A rare pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with proinsulin-secreting activity

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Anna R. Volkova ◽  
Svetlana V. Dora ◽  
Elena N. Ostrouchova ◽  
Anna V. Lisker ◽  
Galina V. Semikova ◽  
...  

This paper presents a clinical case describing hypoglycemic condition with atypical symptoms in a young patient in the early postpartum period. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a large formation in the hook region of the pancreas, which was subsequently confirmed according to endoscopic ultrasound, CT and MRI. The idea of insulinoma was formed according to the presence of pancreatic formation, documented Whipple’s triad, and data on hyperinsulinism at the outpatient stage. However, the 72-hour fasting test showed no significant increase in insulin and C-peptide levels. After excluding other causes of hypoglycemia, the patient was suspected of having proinsulinoma, which was confirmed by increased blood proinsulin level. Gastropancreatoduodenal resection was performed. We detected a highly differentiated neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor with the expression of CD56, NSE, synaptophysin and chromogranin A, with a Ki-67 index of about 1%. After surgical treatment, hypoglycemic conditions were not observed.

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S77-S77
Author(s):  
N C Jadhav ◽  
D L Gang

Abstract Casestudy: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNEN) are rare accounting for 2-5% of pancreatic tumors. Although mostly sporadic, 10-20% are associated with inherited syndromes, notably MEN-1, Von Hippel- Lindau disease, neurofibromatosis type 1, and tuberous sclerosis (TS). When compared to sporadic cases, PanNEN in hereditary syndromes occur at a younger age, are often multifocal, cystic, and may show characteristic microscopic patterns. TS is an autosomal dominant multi-system disorder with mutations involving TSC1 or TSC2 genes which function as tumor suppressors by inhibiting mTORC1 kinase. PanNEN is observed in 1.5-1.8% of patients with TS and no surveillance guidelines for the assessment of pancreatic lesions are established. Compared to other syndromes, PanNEN associated with TS are solitary. To our knowledge, only two cases of multifocal PanNEN in TS patients have been reported. We present a case of a 67-year-old gentleman with a history of TS also affecting two daughters. He presented to the emergency department with severe abdominal pain. Abdominal ultrasound suggested acute appendicitis and an incidental 2.0 cm solid lesion was noted in the head of the pancreas. Follow-up MRI revealed two additional non-cystic masses in the pancreatic tail. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of a tail lesion revealed monomorphic tumor cells with stippled chromatin without cytologic atypia. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin. Ki-67 labelling index was under 1%. Diagnosis of a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (G1) was made. The patient denied symptoms of the carcinoid syndrome and no biologically active hormones were detected. Gallium PET scan revealed multiple foci of radiotracer uptake throughout the pancreas in addition to those described on MRI. Although PanNEN are rare in TS, malignant behavior has been reported. This case reinforces the importance of early detection through active surveillance, especially as surgical options may be limited in multifocal disease.


Author(s):  
Vinaya Srirangam Nadhamuni ◽  
Donato Iacovazzo ◽  
Jane Evanson ◽  
Anju Sahdev ◽  
Jacqueline Trouillas ◽  
...  

Summary A male patient with a germline mutation in MEN1 presented at the age of 18 with classical features of gigantism. Previously, he had undergone resection of an insulin-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (pNET) at the age of 10 years and had subtotal parathyroidectomy due to primary hyperparathyroidism at the age of 15 years. He was found to have significantly elevated serum IGF-1, GH, GHRH and calcitonin levels. Pituitary MRI showed an overall bulky gland with a 3 mm hypoechoic area. Abdominal MRI showed a 27 mm mass in the head of the pancreas and a 6 mm lesion in the tail. Lanreotide-Autogel 120 mg/month reduced GHRH by 45% and IGF-1 by 20%. Following pancreaticoduodenectomy, four NETs were identified with positive GHRH and calcitonin staining and Ki-67 index of 2% in the largest lesion. The pancreas tail lesion was not removed. Post-operatively, GHRH and calcitonin levels were undetectable, IGF-1 levels normalised and GH suppressed normally on glucose challenge. Post-operative fasting glucose and HbA1c levels have remained normal at the last check-up. While adolescent-onset cases of GHRH-secreting pNETs have been described, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of ectopic GHRH in a paediatric setting leading to gigantism in a patient with MEN1. Our case highlights the importance of distinguishing between pituitary and ectopic causes of gigantism, especially in the setting of MEN1, where paediatric somatotroph adenomas causing gigantism are extremely rare. Learning points It is important to diagnose gigantism and its underlying cause (pituitary vs ectopic) early in order to prevent further growth and avoid unnecessary pituitary surgery. The most common primary tumour sites in ectopic acromegaly include the lung (53%) and the pancreas (34%) (1): 76% of patients with a pNET secreting GHRH showed a MEN1 mutation (1). Plasma GHRH testing is readily available in international laboratories and can be a useful diagnostic tool in distinguishing between pituitary acromegaly mediated by GH and ectopic acromegaly mediated by GHRH. Positive GHRH immunostaining in the NET tissue confirms the diagnosis. Distinguishing between pituitary (somatotroph) hyperplasia secondary to ectopic GHRH and pituitary adenoma is difficult and requires specialist neuroradiology input and consideration, especially in the MEN1 setting. It is important to note that the vast majority of GHRH-secreting tumours (lung, pancreas, phaeochromocytoma) are expected to be visible on cross-sectional imaging (median diameter 55 mm) (1). Therefore, we suggest that a chest X-ray and an abdominal ultrasound checking the adrenal glands and the pancreas should be included in the routine work-up of newly diagnosed acromegaly patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32
Author(s):  
Min Je Sung ◽  
Moon Jae Chung

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) refer to tumors originating from the islet of Langerhans and shows various prognosis based on the presence or absence of symptoms due to hormone secretion, the Ki-67 cell proliferation index, and the histologic grade, and according to the degree of disease progression defined by the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage classification. The purpose of medical treatment for PNET is to control symptoms or inhibit tumor growth. Somatostatin analogues can be administered for the purpose of controlling symptoms caused by the secretion of specific hormones, and are accepted as effective drugs for inhibiting the progression of G1/G2 tumors based on World Health Organization (WHO) classification with a Ki-67 cell proliferation index less than 20%. Among the molecularly targeted agents, everolimus and sunitinib can be considered in patients with WHO G1/G2 PNET showing progression after somatostatin analog therapy. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is generally administered to patients with large tumor volume and rapidly progressing metastatic NET, and etoposide/cisplatin combination therapy has been considered as a standard treatment. For the patient group of Grade 3 PNET (well differentiated) newly classified by the WHO 2017 classification, guidelines for standard treatment have not yet been established. As it has been reported, studies are needed to evaluate the treatment response rate of somatostatin analogues or molecularly targeted therapies for the patient with Grade 3 PNET. It is important to consider a multidisciplinary approach with all possible treatment options including medical treatment, radical resection of primary or metastatic lesions, liver-directed therapies, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for the patients with PNET.


2018 ◽  
pp. 387-398
Author(s):  
Abdullah Jibawi ◽  
Mohamed Baguneid ◽  
Arnab Bhowmick

Pancreatic cancer is the tenth most common cancer in the UK and is most often incurable at diagnosis. Presentation is generally with weight loss, jaundice, and or abdominal pain. Abdominal ultrasound, CT and MRI may be diagnostic. Tissue diagnosis is not usually necessary, but endoscopic ultrasound can obtain fine needle samples. The serum marker CA19-9 may be raised, but is not a screening test. Potentially curable lesions need careful multidisciplinary assessment for resectability, and a thorough assessment of patient fitness. The Whipple procedure is discussed as well as laparoscopic pancreatectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy and palliative gemcitabine therapy are also covered.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 13-13
Author(s):  
Otávio Mendes Filho ◽  
Carolina A. D. Maués ◽  
Frank P. P. C. De Macedo ◽  
Saullo A. C. Monteiro ◽  
Elaine F. C. Araújo ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB254
Author(s):  
Raffaele Manta ◽  
Helga Bertani ◽  
Carmelo Barbera ◽  
Francesco Marini ◽  
Ugo Germani ◽  
...  

Pancreatology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. S80
Author(s):  
Lucia Moletta ◽  
Anna Caterina Milanetto ◽  
Valbona Lico ◽  
Fabio Farinati ◽  
Rita Alaggio ◽  
...  

Pancreas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geetanjali R. Kamath ◽  
Michelle K. Kim ◽  
Emanuela Taioli

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. E25-E28
Author(s):  
J. D. Ulrich ◽  
K. Specht ◽  
A. M. Schlitter ◽  
G. O. Ceyhan ◽  
M. Quante ◽  
...  

AbstractA 49-year-old woman consulted her general practitioner (GP) regarding epigastric pain that she had experienced for 2 months. Physical examination and laboratory results were unremarkable. An abdominal ultrasound indicated a solid pancreatic tumor, which was confirmed on subsequent CT and MRI. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showed a well-defined heterogeneous, predominantly hypoechoic mass in the pancreatic body, so a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) was suspected. However, EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed and based on (immuno-)histochemical findings, the extremely rare diagnosis of a perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the pancreas was made. Due to the malignant potential of pancreatic PEComas, laparoscopic left-sided pancreatectomy was performed. We present a case diagnosed by preoperative EUS-FNA highlighting the clinical and endosonographic features which help to distinguish it from its most important differential diagnosis, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the pancreas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document