scholarly journals Association of polymorphic loci of susceptibility to diabetes mellitus type 2 in various ethnic groups of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-272
Author(s):  
D. S. Avzaletdinova ◽  
T. V. Morugova ◽  
L. F. Sharipova ◽  
O. V. Kochetova

The multifactorial nature of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) was confirmed by numerous researches. The first investigations devoted to molecular-genetic mechanisms of T2D were carried out on the basis of linkage disequilibrium (LD) studying and later the candidate genes of T2D have begun investigated. We have analyzed the literature data including the case-control studies in populations of Russia. There were revealed 33 genes and 65 polymorphic markers in the analyzed works. The analysis of association of T2D in the ethnic groups of Russian Federation was carried out on following genes: ABCC8, ADIPOQ, ADIPOR1, ADIPOR2, C2CD4A/C2CD4A, CDKAL1, ­CDKN2A/2B, CCL11, CCL20, CCL5, CYBA, FABP2, FTO, GCLC, GPX2, GSTP1, GSTT1, HHEX/IDE, IGF2BP2, IRS1, KCNJ11, KCNQ1, LPL, LRP5, MC4R, PPARG, SLC2A2, SLC30A8, SLC30A8, TCF7L2, TMEM18, WFS1, ZFAND6. The major of studies are replicative, i.e. repeating previous investigations of foreign authors, and were performed on Russian, Tatar and Yakut populations. At the same time not all the loci of genetic susceptibility have demonstrated the association with T2D in the population of Russia. In this work the systematic review of studies of molecular-genetic markers of T2D in the ethnic groups of Russian Federation was made for the first time.

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S585
Author(s):  
M. Shestakova ◽  
A. Mayorov ◽  
G. Galstyan ◽  
A. Kolbin ◽  
M. Arepeva ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 518-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan I. Dedov ◽  
Anna V. Koncevaya ◽  
Marina V. Shestakova ◽  
Yuriy B. Belousov ◽  
Julia A. Balanova ◽  
...  

Background. Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (DMT2) is a complex medical and social problem in the world and in the Russian Federation also due to prevalence and probability of cardio-vascular complications (CVC).Aim. Economic burden evaluation of DMT2 in the Russian Federation.Methods. Complex analysis of expenditures (direct and non-direct costs) based on epidemiological, pharmacoeconomics and clinical investigations, population and medical statistics data.Results. Calculated expenditures for DMT2 are 569 bln RUR per year, that is correspond to 1% of the Russian GDP, and 34,7% of that are expenditures for main CVC (ischemic heart disease, cardiac infarction, stroke). Main part of expenses are non-medical (losses GDP) due to temporary and permanent disability, untimely mortality – 426,7 bln RUR per year. Expenditures in estimated group of patients with non-diagnosed DMT2 but with already having CVC were at least 107 bln per year (18,8% from total cost). Relationship between cost of DMT2 and degree of it’s control was found in the Russian conditions. Estimated cost for compensated patient (HbA1c6,5%) per year was 88 982 RUR, in the same time cost of non-control patient (HbA1c9,5%) was in 2,8 times higher due to more often main CVC in this group.Conclusion. DMT2 diagnosis improvement as well as effective treatment of early stages of illness can decrease probability of CVC and social economic expenditures. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1S1) ◽  
pp. 1-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan I. Dedov ◽  
Marina V. Shestakova ◽  
Aleksandr Y. Mayorov ◽  
Olga K. Vikulova ◽  
Gagik R. Galstyan ◽  
...  

Dear Colleagues! We are glad to present the 9th Edition (revised) of Standards of Diabetes Care. These evidence-based guidelines were designed to standardize and facilitate diabetes care in all regions of the Russian Federation. The Standards are updated on the regular basis to incorporate new data and relevant recommendations from national and international clinical societies, including World Health Organization Guidelines (WHO, 2011, 2013), International Diabetes Federation (IDF, 2011, 2012, 2013), American Diabetes Association (ADA, 2018, 2019), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE, 2019), International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD, 2014, 2018) and Russian Association of Endocrinologists (RAE, 2011, 2012, 2015). Current edition of the Standards also integrates results of completed randomized clinical trials (ADVANCE, ACCORD, VADT, UKPDS, SAVOR, TECOS, LEADER, EXAMINE, ELIXA, SUSTAIN, DEVOTE, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS, DECLARE, CARMELINA, REWIND, etc.), as well as findings from the national studies of diabetes mellitus (DM), conducted in close partnership with a number of Russian hospitals. Latest data indicates that prevalence of DM in the world increased during the last decade more than two-fold, reaching some 463 million patients by the end of 2019. According to the current estimation by the International Diabetes Federation, 578 million patients will be suffering from diabetes mellitus by by 2030 and 700 million by 2045. Like many other countries, Russian Federation experiences a sharp rise in the prevalence of DM. According to Russian Federal Diabetes Register, there are at least 4 584 575 patients with DM in this country by the end of 2018 (3,1% of population) with 92% (4 238 503) Type 2 DM, 6% (256 202) Type 1 DM and 2% (89 870) other types of DM, including 8 006 women with gestational DM. However, these results underestimates real quantity of patients, because they consider only registered cases. Results of Russian epidemiological study (NATION) con- firmed that only 54% of Type 2 DM are diagnosed. So real number of patients with DM in Russia is 9 million patients (about 6% of population). This is a great long-term problem, because a lot of patients are not diagnosed, so they dont receive any treatment ant have high risk of vascular complications. Severe consequences of the global pandemics of DM include its vascular complications: nephropathy, retinopathy, coronary, cerebral, coronary and peripheral vascular disease. These conditions are responsible for the majority of cases of diabetes-related disability and death. In сurrent edition of the Standards: New goals of glycemic control for the elderly, based on the presence of functional dependence, as well as for pregnant women, children and adolescents, are given. Added a snippet that describes the continuous glucose monitoring. Only low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level is used as a target for lipid metabolism. Proposes more stringent target levels of blood pressure. It also features updated guidelines on stratification of treatment in newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes: the excess of the initial level of HbA1c over the target level was used as a criterion. In the recommendations for the personalization of the choice of antidiabetic agents, it is taken into account that in certain clinical situations (the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors, chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, obesity, the risk of hypoglycemia) certain classes of hypoglycemic agents (or individual drugs) have proven advantages. Recommendations for psychosocial support are added. The position of metabolic surgery as a method of treatment of DM with morbid obesity is updated. Recommendations for diagnostic and treatment of hypogonadism syndrome in men with DM are added. For the first time, evidence levels of confidence and credibility levels of recommendations for diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitative and preventive interventions based on a systematic review of the literature are given in accordance with the recommendations of the Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. This text represents a consensus by the absolute majority of national experts, achieved through a number of fruitful discus- sions held at national meetings and forums. These guidelines are intended for endocrinologists, primary care physicians and other medical professionals involved in the treatment of DM. On behalf of the Working Group


Author(s):  
Larisa N. Chikinova ◽  
I. V Begma ◽  
N. S Zapariy ◽  
Zh. V Boltenko

When analyzing the indices and the structure of the disability due to diabetes mellitus over the period of 2012-2016, a decrease in the number of diabetes mellitus patients both recognized as disabled for the first time (RDFT) and recognized as disabled repeatedly (RDR), reduction in the level of the primary and secondary disability due to diabetes mellitus, a predominance of group III invalids in the structure of the contingent of RDFT and RDR, but more than a third were invalids of the I and II disability groups, which determines the need for the development of comprehensive programs for the prevention of diabetes mellitus, rehabilitation of patients and people with disabilities with this pathology.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 403-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan I. Dedov ◽  
Marina F. Kalashnikova ◽  
Dmitriy Y. Belousov ◽  
Aleksey S. Kolbin ◽  
Vladimir V. Rafalskiy ◽  
...  

Background: Cost-of-Illness Analysis (COI) constitutes the basis for the decision-making process on the budget and allocation in a modern health care system. Considering the wide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (Т2DM), it is important to perform COI in the Russian Federation (RF). Aim: The aim of the secondary objective FORSIGHT-Т2DM study was to conduct Cost-of-Illness Analysis (COI) of Т2DM in the Russian Federation in relation to taking into consideration the presence of complications and concomitant diseases. Materials and methods: COI of Т2DM was performed using the data obtained in Russian multicenter observational, pharmacoepidemiologic cross-sectional study of diabetes care for assessing routine healthcare pattern of T2DM in the Russian Federation (FORSIGHT-Т2DM). Information for each patient was collected from primary medical records and By asking patients to fill out a questionnaire. Total costs were calculated as the sum of direct medical costs (DCm), direct non-medical costs (DCn) and indirect costs (IC). Results: The final analysis included data from 2014 patients with T2DM residing in 45 cities of RF. Total direct medical costs (DCm) of treating Т2DM and its complications and comorbidities amounted to 105 337 rubles ($2742) per patient per year; direct non-medical costs (DCn) amounted to 24 518 rubles ($638) per patient per year; indirect costs (IC) amounted to 149 754 rubles ($3898) per patient per year. The total cost of T2DM in RF in 2014 year amounted to 279 609 rubles ($7278) per patient. The total cost of T2DM in RF in 2014 amounted to 279 609 rubles per patient. Conclusions: More than half (53,5%) of the total cost of T2DM is the loss of GDP due to patients disability. The DCm constitute 37,7% of the total cost of the disease, of which 57% is spent on treatment of T2DM complications and concomitant diseases, while only 10% is spent on glucose-lowering therapies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
AN Sumin ◽  
N Bezdenezhnykh ◽  
AV Bezdenezhnykh ◽  
GV Artamonova

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases” The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) in the presence of pre-diabetes and diabetes mellitus in the population sample of the Russian Federation, as well as to investigate the factors associated with pathological CAVI in these subjects. Methods 1628 (age 25-64 years) were recruited in a observational cross-sectional study ESSE-RF in the period from 2012 to 2013. The standard protocol of the ESSE-RF has been extended with additional study of CAVI. The final sample included 1617 people, they are divided into 3 groups: group 1 - patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 272), group 2 - patients with prediabetes - IFG, IGT or their combination (n = 44), and group 3 - persons without CMD (n = 1301). Results The median CAVI was higher in diabetes and pre-diabetes groups (p = 0.009 and p <0.001, respectively, compared with group without CMD). Pathological CAVI (≥9.0) was detected in 16.8% of diabetes patients, in 15.9% of those with prediabetes, and in 9.0% of those without CMD (p <0.001 when comparing diabetes group and group without CMD). The groups with diabetes and prediabetes also did not differ in factors affecting the level of arterial wall stiffness (gender, blood pressure, age, dyslipidemia, uric acid level). According to the result of the correlation analysis in the general sample, CAVI positively correlated with age (p <0.001), male sex (p <0.001), type 2 diabetes (p <0.001), prediabetes (p = 0.002), waist circumference (p <0.001), visceral obesity (p <0.001), total cholesterol (p <0.001), triglycerides (p <0.001), LDL cholesterol (p <0.001), and with the inverse correlation - with glomerular filtration rate (GFR, p <0.001). In multivariate analysis, age and the presence of arterial hypertension were independently associated with pathological CAVI in the groups of patients with CMD, and in the group without CMD, in addition to these factors - a decrease in GFR. Conclusions In the population sample of the Russian Federation, the CAVI index values in the prediabetes and diabetes patients were higher than in the normoglycemia persons. The groups with diabetes and prediabetes also did not differ in factors affecting the level of arterial wall stiffness. Since the identified disorders of arterial stiffness in prediabetes are similar to those in diabetes, their identification is important to prevent further cardiovascular complications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1S1) ◽  
pp. 1-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan I. Dedov ◽  
Marina V. Shestakova ◽  
Aleksandr Y. Mayorov ◽  
Olga K. Vikulova ◽  
Gagik R. Galstyan ◽  
...  

Dear Colleagues! We are glad to present the 9th Edition (revised) of Standards of Diabetes Care. These evidence-based guidelines were designed to standardize and facilitate diabetes care in all regions of the Russian Federation. The Standards are updated on the regular basis to incorporate new data and relevant recommendations from national and international clinical societies, including World Health Organization Guidelines (WHO, 2011, 2013), International Diabetes Federation (IDF, 2011, 2012, 2013), American Diabetes Association (ADA, 2018, 2019), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE, 2019), International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD, 2014, 2018) and Russian Association of Endocrinologists (RAE, 2011, 2012, 2015). Current edition of the Standards also integrates results of completed randomized clinical trials (ADVANCE, ACCORD, VADT, UKPDS, SAVOR, TECOS, LEADER, EXAMINE, ELIXA, SUSTAIN, DEVOTE, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS, DECLARE, CARMELINA, REWIND, etc.), as well as findings from the national studies of diabetes mellitus (DM), conducted in close partnership with a number of Russian hospitals. Latest data indicates that prevalence of DM in the world increased during the last decade more than two-fold, reaching some 463 million patients by the end of 2019. According to the current estimation by the International Diabetes Federation, 578 million patients will be suffering from diabetes mellitus by by 2030 and 700 million by 2045. Like many other countries, Russian Federation experiences a sharp rise in the prevalence of DM. According to Russian Federal Diabetes Register, there are at least 4 584 575 patients with DM in this country by the end of 2018 (3,1% of population) with 92% (4 238 503) Type 2 DM, 6% (256 202) Type 1 DM and 2% (89 870) other types of DM, including 8 006 women with gestational DM. However, these results underestimates real quantity of patients, because they consider only registered cases. Results of Russian epidemiological study (NATION) con- firmed that only 54% of Type 2 DM are diagnosed. So real number of patients with DM in Russia is 9 million patients (about 6% of population). This is a great long-term problem, because a lot of patients are not diagnosed, so they dont receive any treatment ant have high risk of vascular complications. Severe consequences of the global pandemics of DM include its vascular complications: nephropathy, retinopathy, coronary, cerebral, coronary and peripheral vascular disease. These conditions are responsible for the majority of cases of diabetes-related disability and death. In сurrent edition of the Standards: New goals of glycemic control for the elderly, based on the presence of functional dependence, as well as for pregnant women, children and adolescents, are given. Added a snippet that describes the continuous glucose monitoring. Only low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level is used as a target for lipid metabolism. Proposes more stringent target levels of blood pressure. It also features updated guidelines on stratification of treatment in newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes: the excess of the initial level of HbA1c over the target level was used as a criterion. In the recommendations for the personalization of the choice of antidiabetic agents, it is taken into account that in certain clinical situations (the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors, chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, obesity, the risk of hypoglycemia) certain classes of hypoglycemic agents (or individual drugs) have proven advantages. Recommendations for psychosocial support are added. The position of metabolic surgery as a method of treatment of DM with morbid obesity is updated. Recommendations for diagnostic and treatment of hypogonadism syndrome in men with DM are added. For the first time, evidence levels of confidence and credibility levels of recommendations for diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitative and preventive interventions based on a systematic review of the literature are given in accordance with the recommendations of the Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. This text represents a consensus by the absolute majority of national experts, achieved through a number of fruitful discus- sions held at national meetings and forums. These guidelines are intended for endocrinologists, primary care physicians and other medical professionals involved in the treatment of DM. On behalf of the Working Group


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document