scholarly journals Does a Functional Integral Really Need a Lagrangian?

10.14311/1269 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kochan

Path integral formulation of quantum mechanics (and also other equivalent formulations) depends on a Lagrangian and/or Hamiltonian function that is chosen to describe the underlying classical system. The arbitrariness presented in this choice leads to a phenomenon called Quantization ambiguity. For example both L1 = ˙q2 and L2 = eq˙ are suitable Lagrangians on a classical level (δL1 = δL2), but quantum mechanically they are diverse. This paper presents a simple rearrangement of the path integral to a surface functional integral. It is shown that the surface functional integral formulation gives transition probability amplitude which is free of any Lagrangian/Hamiltonian and requires just the underlying classical equations of motion. A simple example examining the functionality of the proposed method is considered.

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (20n21) ◽  
pp. 5009-5035 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. GOZZI ◽  
D. MAURO ◽  
A. SILVESTRI

In the quantum path integral formulation of a field theory model an anomaly arises when the functional measure is not invariant under a symmetry transformation of the Lagrangian. In this paper, generalizing previous work done on the point particle, we show that even at the classical level we can give a path integral formulation for any field theory model. Since classical mechanics cannot be affected by anomalies, the measure of the classical path integral of a field theory must be invariant under the symmetry. The classical path integral measure contains the fields of the quantum one plus some extra auxiliary ones. So, at the classical level, there must be a sort of "cancellation" of the quantum anomaly between the original fields and the auxiliary ones. In this paper we prove in detail how this occurs for the chiral anomaly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document