scholarly journals Dispersion of ancient humans in east Asia during the late Pleistocene: Geography, archaeology and ecology

Author(s):  
Guan Ying ◽  
Zhou Zhenyu
Keyword(s):  
Nature ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 592 (7853) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateja Hajdinjak ◽  
Fabrizio Mafessoni ◽  
Laurits Skov ◽  
Benjamin Vernot ◽  
Alexander Hübner ◽  
...  

AbstractModern humans appeared in Europe by at least 45,000 years ago1–5, but the extent of their interactions with Neanderthals, who disappeared by about 40,000 years ago6, and their relationship to the broader expansion of modern humans outside Africa are poorly understood. Here we present genome-wide data from three individuals dated to between 45,930 and 42,580 years ago from Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria1,2. They are the earliest Late Pleistocene modern humans known to have been recovered in Europe so far, and were found in association with an Initial Upper Palaeolithic artefact assemblage. Unlike two previously studied individuals of similar ages from Romania7 and Siberia8 who did not contribute detectably to later populations, these individuals are more closely related to present-day and ancient populations in East Asia and the Americas than to later west Eurasian populations. This indicates that they belonged to a modern human migration into Europe that was not previously known from the genetic record, and provides evidence that there was at least some continuity between the earliest modern humans in Europe and later people in Eurasia. Moreover, we find that all three individuals had Neanderthal ancestors a few generations back in their family history, confirming that the first European modern humans mixed with Neanderthals and suggesting that such mixing could have been common.


2004 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.I. Lim ◽  
H.S. Jung ◽  
B.O. Kim ◽  
J.Y. Choi ◽  
H.N. Kim

1993 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. G. Reynolds

Whilst research has shown many faults with the Movius scheme of a Middle Pleistocene group of Chopper/Chopping tool industries in South-East Asia, it remains a fact that pebble tool industries are still the dominant characteristic of the South-East Asian record. Exploration has now revealed hundreds of Late Pleistocene and Holocene sites in Mainland South-East Asia and these are archaeologically very different from cave sites in Europe. Further problems exist with the current nomenclature of later industries, such as the Hoabinhian and the Neolithic, for there is a large amount of overlap between such assemblages. Should such factors as economy, site location, etc. be used to assist clarification of such problems?This paper outlines some of these issues and reveals that the pebble tool tradition as it is widely known in South-East Asia is a relatively recent phenomenon dating back to the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). A possible reason for the change from flake to pebble tool industrial types and in the visibility of sites is the environmental changes and rise in sea level which submerged over half the available land area in the region during the Late Pleistocene. An existing broad spectrum system of exploitation was likely to have been intensified as a result of this.


1998 ◽  
Vol 106 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 27-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisao Baba ◽  
Shuichiro Narasaki ◽  
Seiho Ohyama

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chun Li ◽  
Hua-Wei Wang ◽  
Jiao-Yang Tian ◽  
Li-Na Liu ◽  
Li-Qin Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (18) ◽  
pp. 1497-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongli Ding ◽  
Dongsheng Liu

1989 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-217
Author(s):  
Hisao NAKAGAWA ◽  
Sadao SHOJI ◽  
Tatsuo WAKO ◽  
Hiroshi KAJIWARA ◽  
Sadako TAKEUTI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document