A high intensity interval training intervention in children with obesity

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Dias
Keyword(s):  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Training Intervention ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval

scholarly journals PO-082 16-Week high intensity interval training does not alter LKB1 and AMPKα protein in Rats Liver

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Shao ◽  
Hao Su ◽  
ZhongYe Jiang ◽  
ZhenXing Kong ◽  
GuoHuan Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Expression ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Training Intervention ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Aging Rats ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Intensity Interval

Objective Liver, as one of the most important organs involved in lipids and glucose metabolism, yet no study has examined the response of liver kinase B1 (LKB1) and AMP-activated protein kinase α(AMPKα) signaling after high intensity interval training. This study aims to evaluate the effect of 16-week high intensity interval training intervention on the expression of LKB1、AMPKα in liver of aging rats. Methods 8 -month-old male Wistar rats（n=40）were randomly divided into control group (C) and HIIT group (H). Group H with 70%-90%-50%VO2max intensity training for 50min/ day, 5 days / week, lasted for 16 weeks. Rats were killed on 0, 8 and 16 weeks. We examined the protein expression of LKB1 and AMPKα in liver. Proteins were analyzed by western blot analysis. Data are mean±SD; for ANOVA, p<0.05 was significant. Results The AMPKα levels in group C and group H increased with time and there was no significant difference between the groups. The content of LKB1 in group C and group H both increased first and then decreased, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Conclusions 16-week high intensity interval training intervention had no effect on LKB1, AMPKα protein expression in aging rats.

scholarly journals A Multidisciplinary Evaluation of a Virtually Supervised Home-Based High-Intensity Interval Training Intervention in People With Type 1 Diabetes

Diabetes Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 2330-2333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam N. Scott ◽  
Sam O. Shepherd ◽  
Rob C. Andrews ◽  
Parth Narendran ◽  
Tejpal S. Purewal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Training Intervention ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Home Based ◽  
High Intensity Interval

Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of a Teacher-Facilitated High-Intensity Interval Training Intervention for Older Adolescents

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angus A. Leahy ◽  
Narelle Eather ◽  
Jordan J. Smith ◽  
Charles H. Hillman ◽  
Philip J. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiorespiratory Fitness ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
School Level ◽  
Training Intervention ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Older Adolescents ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Grade 11

Purpose:This study was designed to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a teacher-facilitated high-intensity interval training intervention for older adolescents (ie, 16–18 y).Methods:Two secondary schools from New South Wales, Australia were recruited, and participants (ie, grade 11 students; 16.2 [0.4] y) were randomized at the school level to the Burn 2 Learn intervention (n = 38), or a wait-list control group (n = 30). Teachers were trained to facilitate the delivery of the novel high-intensity interval training program, which involved 3 sessions per week (∼12–20 min) for 14 weeks. A range of process measures were used to assess intervention feasibility (ie, recruitment, retention, attendance, and program satisfaction). Primary (cardiorespiratory fitness, determined using the progressive aerobic cardiovascular endurance run shuttle run test) and secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline and posttest (14-wk).Results:Sixty-eight grade 11 students were recruited at baseline (85% of target sample), 61 participants completed posttest assessments (90% retention) and on average, participants performed 1.9 sessions per week. Overall, teachers (4.0/5) and students (4.0/5) were satisfied with the Burn 2 Learn program. Group by time effects were observed for cardiorespiratory fitness (8.9 laps; 95% confidence intervals, 1.7–16.2) and a selection of secondary outcomes.Conclusion:This study provides evidence for the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a teacher-facilitated high-intensity interval training intervention for older adolescents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document