Dental procedures and subsequent prosthetic joint infections

2011 ◽  
Vol 142 (12) ◽  
pp. 1343-1351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel D. Skaar ◽  
Heidi O’Connor ◽  
Bryan S. Michalowicz
Keyword(s):  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Dental Procedures ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections

scholarly journals Micromonas micros Infection of a Prosthetic Hip Joint: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Abhimanyu Aggarwal ◽  
Durane Walker
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Dental Procedure ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joints ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Dental Procedures ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Hematogenous Seeding

Micromonas micros is an oral anaerobic Gram-positive coccus and is a commensal of the mouth, and it is rarely isolated in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and even less frequently related to a preceding dental procedure with eventual hematogenous seeding of the prosthetic joint. Here, we present a case of a 56-year-old male with a prosthetic hip joint who developed Micromonas micros prosthetic hip joint infection with symptoms starting a few days after a dental procedure and not having received periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis. He recovered well with surgical intervention and antimicrobial therapy. We conducted a literature review of prosthetic hip joint infections caused by Micromonas micros as well as briefly discuss current guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with prosthetic joints undergoing dental procedures and some knowledge gaps.

scholarly journals Use of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Tooth Extractions, Dental Implants, and Periodontal Surgical Procedures

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie J Suda ◽  
Heather Henschel ◽  
Ursula Patel ◽  
Margaret A Fitzpatrick ◽  
Charlesnika T Evans
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Oral Infections ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Dental Procedures ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Tooth Extractions

Abstract Background Guidelines for antibiotics prior to dental procedures for patients with specific cardiac conditions and prosthetic joints have changed, reducing indications for antibiotic prophylaxis. In addition to guidelines focused on patient comorbidities, systematic reviews specific to dental extractions and implants support preprocedure antibiotics for all patients. However, data on dentist adherence to these recommendations are scarce. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of veterans undergoing tooth extractions, dental implants, and periodontal procedures. Patients receiving antibiotics for oral or nonoral infections were excluded. Data were collected through manual review of the health record. Results Of 183 veterans (mean age, 62 years; 94.5% male) undergoing the included procedures, 82.5% received antibiotic prophylaxis (mean duration, 7.1 ± 1.6 days). Amoxicillin (71.3% of antibiotics) and clindamycin (23.8%) were prescribed most frequently; 44.7% of patients prescribed clindamycin were not labeled as penicillin allergic. Of those who received prophylaxis, 92.1% received postprocedure antibiotics only, 2.6% received preprocedural antibiotics only, and 5.3% received pre- and postprocedure antibiotics. When prophylaxis was indicated, 87.3% of patients received an antibiotic. However, 84.9% received postprocedure antibiotics when preprocedure administration was indicated. While the majority of antibiotics were indicated, only 8.2% of patients received antibiotics appropriately. The primary reason was secondary to prolonged duration. Three months postprocedure, there were no occurrences of Clostridium difficile infection, infective endocarditis, prosthetic joint infections, or postprocedure oral infections. Conclusion The majority of patients undergoing a dental procedure received antibiotic prophylaxis as indicated. Although patients for whom antibiotic prophylaxis was indicated should have received a single preprocedure dose, most antibiotics were prescribed postprocedure. Dental stewardship efforts should ensure appropriate antibiotic timing, indication, and duration.

scholarly journals Genomic Analysis of Cutibacterium acnes Strains Isolated from Prosthetic Joint Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1500
Author(s):  
Llanos Salar-Vidal ◽  
Yvonne Achermann ◽  
John-Jairo Aguilera-Correa ◽  
Anja Poehlein ◽  
Jaime Esteban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Normal Skin ◽  
Genomic Analysis ◽  
Healthy Skin ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Cutibacterium Acnes ◽  
Clinical Conditions

Cutibacterium acnes is a common cause of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The C. acnes population can be divided into six main phylotypes (IA1, IA2, IB, IC, II and III) that are associated with different clinical conditions and normal skin. A single-locus sequence typing (SLST) scheme can distinguish ten main SLST types: A-E (all IA1), F (IA2), G (IC), H (IB), K (II), L (III). We genome-sequenced and compared 16 strains of C. acnes isolated from healthy skin (n = 4) and PJIs (n = 12), including six PJI cases with a good outcome (four shoulder PJIs, one hip PJI, one knee PJI) and six with infection relapse (three shoulder PJIs, three hip PJIs). The sequenced strains belonged to four different phylotypes (IA1, IA2, IB and II) and seven different SLST types. All five type IB strains (all SLST type H1) were PJI isolates (three hip PJIs, two shoulder PJIs), and four of these caused infection relapse (three hip PJIs, one shoulder PJI). Isolates from PJI cases with a good outcome belonged to three different phylotypes (IA, IB, II). Interestingly, four strains (three strains from PJI cases with good outcome and one strain from healthy skin) contained a linear plasmid; these strains belonged to different SLST types (A1, C1, F4, H1) and were isolated in three different hospitals. This study suggests that type IB strains have the potential to cause infection relapse, in particular regarding hip PJIs. Moreover, our study revealed that strains belonging to the same SLST type can differ in their accessory genome in different geographic locations, indicative of microevolution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document