scholarly journals Estimating species-specific diameter distributions and saw log recoveries of boreal forests from airborne laser scanning data and aerial photographs: a distribution-based approach

Silva Fennica ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jussi Peuhkurinen ◽  
Matti Maltamo ◽  
Jukka Malinen
2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 1750-1760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petteri Packalén ◽  
Matti Maltamo

The use of diameter distributions originates from a need for tree-level description of forest stands, which is required, for example, in growth simulators and bucking. Diameter distribution models are usually applied, since measuring empirical diameter distributions in practical forest inventories is too laborious. This study investigated the ability of remote sensing information to predict species-specific diameter distributions. The study was carried out in Finland in a typical managed boreal forest area. The tree species considered were Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.), Norway spruce ( Picea abies (L.) Karst.), and deciduous trees as a group. Growing stock was estimated using the k-MSN method using airborne laser scanning data and aerial photographs. Two approaches were compared: first, the nearest neighbour approach based on field measured trees was used as such to predict diameter distribution, and second, a theoretical diameter distribution approach in which the parameters of the Weibull distribution are predicted using the k-MSN estimates was applied. Basically, all test criteria indicated that the diameter distribution based on nearest neighbour imputed trees outperforms the Weibull distribution, but care must be taken to ensure that the modelling data are comprehensive enough.


2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 2427-2438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Nurul Islam ◽  
Mikko Kurttila ◽  
Lauri Mehtätalo ◽  
Timo Pukkala

Errors in inventory data may lead to inoptimal decisions that ultimately result in financial losses for forest owners. We estimated the expected monetary losses resulting from data errors that are similar to errors in laser-based forest inventory. The mean loss was estimated for 67 stands by simulating 100 realizations of inventory data for each stand with errors that mimic those in airborne laser scanning (ALS) based inventory. These realizations were used as input data in stand management optimization, which maximized the present value of all future net incomes (NPV). The inoptimality loss was calculated as the difference between the NPV of the optimal solution and the true NPV of the solution obtained with erroneous input data. The results showed that the mean loss exceeded €300·ha–1 (US$425·ha–1) in 84% of the stands. On average, the losses increased with decreasing stand age and mean diameter. Furthermore, increasing errors in the basal area weighted mean diameter and basal area of spruce were found to significantly increase the loss. It has been discussed that improvements in the accuracy of ALS-based inventory could be financially justified.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ville Vähä-Konka ◽  
Matti Maltamo ◽  
Timo Pukkala ◽  
Kalle Kärhä

Abstract Key message We examined the accuracy of the stand attribute data based on airborne laser scanning (ALS) provided by the Finnish Forest Centre. The precision of forest inventory data was compared for the first time with operative logging data measured by the harvester. Context Airborne laser scanning (ALS) is increasingly used together with models to predict the stand attributes of boreal forests. The information is updated by growth models. Information produced by remote sensing, model prediction, and growth simulation needs field verification. The data collected by harvesters on logging sites provide a means to evaluate and verify the accuracy of the ALS-based data. Aims This study investigated the accuracy of ALS-based forest inventory data provided by the Finnish Forest Centre at the stand level, using harvester data as the reference. Special interest was on timber assortment volumes where the quality reductions of sawlog are model predictions in ALS-based data and true realized reductions in the logging data. Methods We examined the accuracy of total volume and timber assortment volumes by comparing ALS-based data and operative logging data measured by a harvester. This was done both for clear cuttings and thinning sites. Accuracy of the identification of the dominant tree species of the stand was examined using the Kappa coefficient. Results In clear-felling sites, the total harvest removals based on ALS and model prediction had a RMSE% of 26.0%. In thinning, the corresponding difference in the total harvested removal was 42.4%. Compared to logged volume, ALS-based prediction overestimated sawlog removals in clear cuttings and underestimated pulpwood removals. Conclusion The study provided valuable information on the accuracy of ALS-based stand attribute data. Our results showed that ALS-based data need better methods to predict the technical quality of harvested trees, to avoid systematic overestimates of sawlog volume. We also found that the ALS-based estimates do not accurately predict the volume of trees removed in actual thinnings.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gudrun Norstedt ◽  
Anna-Lena Axelsson ◽  
Hjalmar Laudon ◽  
Lars Östlund

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document