scholarly journals Soil carbon modelling as a tool for carbon balance studies in forestry

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 (61) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taru Palosuo
New Forests ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 969-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Ventura ◽  
Pietro Panzacchi ◽  
Enrico Muzzi ◽  
Federico Magnani ◽  
Giustino Tonon

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Martínez-Mena ◽  
Carolina Boix-Fayos ◽  
Efrain Carrillo-López ◽  
Elvira Díaz-Pereira ◽  
Raúl Zornoza ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Diversification practices such as intercropping in woody cropping systems have recently been proposed as a promising management strategy for addressing problems related to soil degradation, climate change mitigation and food security. In this study, we assess the impact of several diversification practices in different management regimes on the main carbon fluxes regulating the soil carbon balance under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Methods The study was conducted in two nearby cropping systems: (i) a low input rainfed almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) orchard cultivated on terraces and (ii) a levelled intensively irrigated mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) orchard with a street-ridge morphology. The almond trees were intercropped with Capparis spinosa or with Thymus hyemalis While the mandarin trees were intercropped with a mixture of barley and vetch followed by fava bean. Changes caused by crop diversifications on C inputs into the soil and C outputs from the soil were estimated. Results Crop diversification did not affect soil organic carbon stocks but did affect the carbon inputs and outputs regulating the soil carbon balance of above Mediterranean agroecosystems. Crop diversification with perennials in the low-input rainfed woody crop system significantly improved the annual soil C balance in the short-term. However, crop diversification with annual species in the intensively managed woody crop system had not effect on the annual soil C balance. Conclusions Our results highlight the potential of intercropping with perennials in rainfed woody crop systems for climate change mitigation through soil carbon sequestration.


Author(s):  
Sangeeta Lenka ◽  
Narendra Kumar Lenka ◽  
Monoranjan Mohanty ◽  
Jayant Kumar Saha ◽  
Ashok Kumar Patra
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 953-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. Keel ◽  
J. Leifeld ◽  
J. Mayer ◽  
A. Taghizadeh-Toosi ◽  
J. E. Olesen

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Tupek ◽  
Aleksi Lehtonen ◽  
Raisa Mäkipää ◽  
Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio ◽  
Saija Huuskonen ◽  
...  

<p>We aimed to estimate a nation-wide potential to improve the carbon balance of the land use sector by removing part of the current croplands on mineral soil from food and feed production to extensive grasslands or afforestation in Finland.  We combined the existing data on forest and agricultural production, and climate with predictive capacity of YASSO07 soil carbon model to estimate changes of soil carbon stock (SOC) in Finland over the past land use change (LUC) from forest to agriculture in comparison with alternative LUC or continuous agriculture in future.</p><p>The model analysis revealed that SOC loss after deforestation during the cultivation period originated mainly from the absence of woody litter input. The non-woody litter input of the forest was comparable to that of the agricultural residues thus the SOC originating from non-woody litter has not changed much during cultivation. The model estimated approximately a 30 year delay in positive soil carbon balance after the afforestation. Longer for Norway spruce than for the Pubescent birch. The comparison of two dominant tree species used for afforestation highlighted a difference in soil versus biomass carbon sequestration. The total forest biomass production and total carbon stock was larger for spruce stands than for birch stands. However, due to larger foliar and fineroot litter input birch stands sequestered more carbon into the soil than spruce stands. The analysis further revealed that extensification of cropland to grassland would not meet 4 per mill soil carbon sequestration criterion needed for achieving Paris climate CO2 reduction target and due to the spatial limitation of afforestation other management measures need to be considered e.g. adding biochar to soils for successful and more permanent CO2 offsetting.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document