scholarly journals Proceedings of the Combined Meeting of the Incubation and Fertility Research Group (IFRG/WPSA Working Group 6) and the Perinatal Development and Fundamental Physiology Group (PDP/WPSA Working Group 12), Hof van Wageningen, the Netherlands, 30 August – 1 S

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Á. Drobnyák ◽  
É. Váradi ◽  
A. Brionne ◽  
A. Collin ◽  
A. Nangsuay ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Annemieke Maria Pustjens ◽  
Jacqueline Jozefine Maria Castenmiller ◽  
Jan Dirk te Biesebeek ◽  
Polly Ester Boon

Abstract Purpose This study attempted gaining insight into the intake of protein and fat of 12- to 36-month-old children in the Netherlands. Methods In 2017, a Total Diet Study (TDS) was carried out in the Netherlands including following three age groups: 12–17-, 18–23- and 24- to 36-month-old children. Protein and fat concentrations of 164 composite samples were analysed and combined with the consumption data from the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2012–2016 (DNFCS). Results Median protein intake of the 12- to 35-month-old Dutch children based on the TDS was 35 g/day with main contributions from the food subgroups “milk and milk-based beverages”, “beef” and “yoghurts and desserts”. Median fat intake was 34 g/day with main contributions from the food subgroups “margarines”, “cheeses” and “milk and milk-based beverages”. For the youngest age group (12- to 18-month-old children), (ready to drink) follow-on formula was one of the main contributors to the fat intake. Conclusion Compared to the EFSA reference values, protein intake of the Dutch 12- to 36-month-old children is high, whereas fat intake follows the reference intake. A TDS is a suitable instrument to estimate macronutrient intakes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 1363-1364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Geier ◽  
Andrea Bauer ◽  
Detlef Becker ◽  
Randolf Brehler ◽  
Reinhard Breit ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Sefton-Green

In 2005 a French working group published an Avant-projet de réforme du droit des obligations et de la prescription (“Avant-projet Catala”).1 At the end of 2007 a Draft Common Frame of Reference (“DCFR”) was submitted to the European Commission by the Study Group on a European Civil Code and the Research Group on EC Private Law (Acquis Group).2 How much ink should we spill over such academic proposals for legislative reform, especially if there are misgivings as to substance, content and legitimacy and doubts as to the prospects for implementation? In an attempt to learn from these projects this paper aims to evaluate and reflect on the position of legal scholars on the political legal scene, and to compare the content of some selected provisions. The overall objective is to investigate how the Avant-projet Catala, a proposal to reform the French Civil Code, and the DCFR, a proposal which looks very much like a European Civil Code, fit together: do these projects have different goals or are they in competition with one another? More particularly, this paper investigates whether these French3 and European initiatives are conducive to creating a more European private law or, on the contrary, whether they reinforce legal nationalism.


2018 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 111-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard M.H. Swaen ◽  
Miranda Langendam ◽  
Joost Weyler ◽  
Huibert Burger ◽  
Sabine Siesling ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document