Accountabilities of posthuman research
What constitutes ‘good’ posthuman research? This article offers three dynamics to help assess the value of posthuman-inspired inquiry. We propose that a good posthuman research account should show evidence that the researcher: (1) attended to their own more-than-humanness and made explicit how they interviewed and attuned to the nonhuman things of their inquiry; (2) reassembled resemblings of the posthuman world by inventively weaving and fusing human and nonhuman storylines; and (3) offered analytic insights into the liveliness of posthuman research work as the performativity of difference.
Keyword(s):
Percepções de professores da área de ciências da natureza e matemática sobre a interdisciplinaridade
2019 ◽
Vol 3
(3)
◽
pp. 811
Keyword(s):
1970 ◽
Vol 28
◽
pp. 202-203
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2020 ◽
Vol 91
(3)
◽
pp. 31301
1979 ◽
Vol 42
(04)
◽
pp. 1135-1140
◽
Keyword(s):