Visual Acuity in Central and Branch Vein Retinal Occlusion in the Presence of Macular Edema: 1 Year of Follow-Up

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santi Maria Recupero ◽  
Andrea Perdicchi ◽  
G. L. Scuderi ◽  
Stefano Amodeo ◽  
Edoardo Maria Medori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Occlusion

Retinal Vasculitis Associated With Dermatomyositis Treated With Intravenous Steroids

2021 ◽  
pp. 247412642110189
Author(s):  
Austen N. Knapp ◽  
Jawad I. Arshad ◽  
Daniel F. Martin ◽  
Rula Hajj-Ali ◽  
Kimberly Baynes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vasculitis ◽  
Subretinal Fluid ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Hand Motion ◽  
Frosted Branch Angiitis ◽  
Intravenous Steroids

Purpose: This work aims to present treatment and long-term follow-up of a 31-year-old woman with dermatomyositis who presented with hemorrhagic retinal vasculitis and macular edema. Methods: A retrospective case report is presented. Results: A 31-year-old woman with dermatomyositis treated with systemic immunosuppression was evaluated for acute, reduced vision. Best-corrected visual acuity was hand motion in the right eye and 20/200 in the left eye. Fundus examination revealed diffuse intraretinal hemorrhages, cotton-wool spots, and vascular sheathing with a frosted branch angiitis–like appearance. Optical coherence tomography revealed significant macular edema and subretinal fluid that quickly resolved after admission and treatment with intravenous steroids. Multimodal imaging at 7-year follow-up disclosed long-term sequelae including peripheral nonperfusion and retinal neovascularization. Conclusions: When vasculitis associated with dermatomyositis is treated aggressively with intravenous steroids at initial presentation, good visual acuity outcomes can be achieved, but long-term consequences of retinal nonperfusion and neovascularization persist.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes of pediatric macular edema associated with non-infectious uveitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anh Hong Nguyen ◽  
Bethlehem Mekonnen ◽  
Eric Kim ◽  
Nisha R. Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Common Diagnosis ◽  
Corticosteroid Injections

Abstract Background Macular edema (ME) is the most frequent cause of irreversible visual impairment in patients with uveitis. To date, little data exists about the clinical course of ME in pediatric patients. A retrospective, observational study was performed to examine the visual and macular thickness outcomes of ME associated with chronic, noninfectious uveitis in pediatric patients. Methods Pediatric patients with noninfectious uveitis complicated by ME seen in the University of California San Francisco Health System from 2012 to 2018 were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Data were collected from medical records including demographics, diagnoses, ocular history, OCT imaging findings, complications, and treatments at first encounter and at 3, 6, 9, and 12-month follow-up visits. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to investigate the association between different classes of treatment (steroid drops, steroid injections, oral steroids and other immunosuppressive therapies) and resolution of macular edema. Results The cohort comprised of 21 children (26 eyes) with a mean age of 10.5 years (SD 3.3). Undifferentiated uveitis was the most common diagnosis, affecting 19 eyes (73.1%). The majority of observed macular edema was unilateral (16 patients, 76.2%) and 5 patients had bilateral macular edema. The mean duration of follow-up at UCSF was 35.3 months (SD 25.7). By 12 months, 18 eyes (69.2%) had achieved resolution of ME. The median time to resolution was 3 months (IQR 3–6 months). Median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline was 0.54 logMAR (Snellen 20/69, IQR 20/40 to 20/200). Median BCVA at 12 months was 0.1 logMAR (Snellen 20/25, IQR 20/20 to 20/50) Corticosteroid injections were associated with a 4.0-fold higher rate of macular edema resolution (95% CI 1.3–12.2, P = 0.01). Conclusions Although only 15% of the pediatric patients with uveitis in the study cohort had ME, it is clinically important to conduct OCTs to detect ME in this population. Treatment resulted in 69% of eyes achieving resolution of ME by 12 months, accompanied with improvement in visual acuity. Corticosteroid injections were significantly associated with resolution of macular edema.

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF INTRAVITREAL TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Prachand Gautam ◽  
Koshal Shrestha ◽  
Gyanendra Lamichhane ◽  
Sushila Patel
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone ◽  
Hard Exudates ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽  
Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic retionopathy is a microangilpathy. The present study was done to investigate results of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide injection for the treatment diffuse diabetic macular edema. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 40 eyes of 40 patients with clinically significant diffuse diabetic macular edema. Eyes were diagnosed with diabetic macular edema according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study guidelines. An Intravitreal injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide at the dose of 4 mg/0.2 ml was administered. Best corrected visual acuity was measured as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and snellen vision drum and size of macular edema (hard exudates) was obtained by slit lamp biomicroscopy using +90 D Volk lens at each visit. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and other complications related with steroid and injection related complications were also evaluated. Subsequently patients were followed up on 1st day, 2nd week and 3rd month. RESULTS: All patients were completed second follow up at 3 months. The mean size of macular edema, which obtained at 3 months postoperatively, was significantly different from the baseline measurement from 1.4125 to 0.9474 DD. Mean visual acuity improved significantly from baseline at 3 months of follow up was 0.7421 LogMAR (≈ 6/30 in Snellen chart). Eleven eyes developed intraocular pressure higher than 21 mmHg at 2nd week postoperatively. Other drug and injection related complications were not developed. Increased IOP were controlled with anti glaucoma drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal Triamcinolone was a promising therapeutic method for diabetic macular edema. TriamcinoloneAcetonide effectively reduces size of macular edema and improves visual acuity in the short term.Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences (2015) Vol.03 No.02 Issue 10 Page: 30-34

scholarly journals Pharmacological Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Real-Life Observational Studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Kodjikian ◽  
David Bellocq ◽  
Thibaud Mathis
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Pharmacological Management ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Baseline Visual Acuity

Objectives of the Study. Summary of observational studies concerning the pharmacological management of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods. A literature review was conducted using the PubMed database on 1 February 2018 to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and dexamethasone (DEX) implants for DME. Studies with more than 10 patients and follow-up of more than 6 months were selected. Analyses were carried out on the overall population and on subgroups defined according to baseline visual acuity (BVA) and the patients’ naïve or non-naïve status. Results. Thirty-two studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and 31 studies evaluating the efficacy of DEX-implants were retained, concerning 6,842 and 1,703 eyes, respectively. A mean gain of +4.7 letters for a mean of 5.8 injections (mean follow-up: 15.6 months) and +9.6 letters for a mean of 1.6 injections (10.3 months) was found in the anti-VEGF and DEX-implant studies, respectively. Final VA appears to be similar for both treatment (62 letters for anti-VEGF, 61.2 letters for DEX-implant), and BVA appears lower for DEX-implant, which may partially explain the greater visual gain. The DEX-implant studies show greater gains in VA compared to the anti-VEGF studies, especially for higher BVA. Indeed, mean gains for the subgroups of patients with BVA<50 letters, 50<BVA<60 letters, and BVA>60 letters are +4.3, +5.8, and +3.1 letters, respectively, in the anti-VEGF studies and +10.5, +9.3, and +8.8 letters, respectively, in the DEX-implant studies. Regarding the patient’s initial status, only naïve status appears to confer the best functional response in DEX-implant studies. Conclusion. Observational studies investigating DEX-implant report clinically similar final VA when compared to anti-VEGF, but superior visual gains in real-life practice. This latter difference could be due to the better BVA, but also to the fact that less injections were administered in the anti-VEGF observational studies than in the interventional studies.

Comparison of aflibercept and ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema associated with subretinal detachment

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Ozkaya ◽  
Gokhan Demir ◽  
Asli Kirmaci
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Retinal Detachment ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Intravitreal Aflibercept ◽  
Best Corrected Visual Acuity

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of ranibizumab and aflibercept in the treatment of diabetic macular edema associated with subfoveal retinal detachment. Methods: This is a retrospective, comparative study. The treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema patients who had diabetic macular edema associated with subfoveal retinal detachment and underwent intravitreal aflibercept or intravitreal ranibizumab treatment were included. The patients were treated on a pro re nata treatment regimen after a loading dose of 3-monthly injections and the follow-up time was 12 months. The primary outcome measure of this study was the presence of subfoveal retinal detachment after treatment at different time points. The secondary outcome measures were the change in best corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness. Results: A total of 46 eyes of 46 patients were included. The aflibercept group consisted of 20 and the ranibizumab group consisted of 26 eyes. During the follow-up period of 12 months, subfoveal retinal detachment was completely resolved in 75% versus 57.7% of the eyes at month 3 (p = 0.2), 90% versus 76.9% at month 6 (p = 0.2), 90% versus 65.4% at month 9 (p = 0.05), and 100% versus 80.8% at month 12 (p = 0.03) in the intravitreal aflibercept versus intravitreal ranibizumab groups. The change in best corrected visual acuity was not statistically different between the groups at months 3, 6, 9, and 12, respectively (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusion: Both intravitreal aflibercept and intravitreal ranibizumab were effective in regards to anatomical and functional outcomes of diabetic macular edema patients associated with subfoveal retinal detachment. Interestingly, intravitreal aflibercept seemed more effective than intravitreal ranibizumab in the resolution of subfoveal retinal detachment at month 12.

Prospective Evaluation of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection in Macular Edema Associated with Retinal Vascular Disorders

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 619-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.K. Tewari ◽  
P. Sony ◽  
R. Chawla ◽  
S.P. Garg ◽  
P. Venkatesh
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Purpose To evaluate the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on visual acuity and macular thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in macular edema associated with various retinal vascular disorders. Methods This prospective nonrandomized clinical interventional study included 81 eyes (76 patients) comprised of Group I, 57 eyes (51 patients) with diabetic macular edema; Group II, 10 eyes (10 patients) with branch retinal vein occlusion; and Group III, 13 eyes (13 patients) with central retinal vein occlusion. All eyes received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide (with the solvent) in the operation theater under sterile conditions. Results Mean preinjection central macular thickness was 531.84±132 μm in Group I, 458.4±149 μm in Group II, and 750.81±148 μm in Group III. All groups showed a statistically significant decrease in mean central macular thickness at 1 month (300.7±119 μM in Group I, 218.2±99 μm in Group II, and 210.5 ±56 μm in Group III) and 3 months (253.19±109 μm in Group I, 187±47 μm in Group II, and 182±50 μm in Group III) after injection (p<0.05). Mean follow-up was 22±2.4 weeks. Mean visual acuity increased in all three groups (preoperative visual acuity in Group I, 1.2±0.4 logMAR units; Group II, 1.24±0.5 logMAR units; Group III, 1.1 ±0.4 logMAR units; 1 month postinjection in Group I, 0.88±0.3 logMAR units; Group II, 0.67±0.3 logMAR units; Group III, 0.86±0.4 logMAR units; 3 months postinjection in Group I, 0.84±0.4 logMAR units; Group II, 0.59±0.3 logMAR units; Group III, 0.82±0.5 logMAR units) (p<0.05). Forty-one eyes completed 6 months and 20 eyes completed 9 months follow-up. Twelve of 20 (41%) eyes in Group I, 2/6 (33%) eyes in Group II, 3/6 (50%) eyes in Group III, and 8/15 (53%) eyes in Group I, 1/3 (33%) eyes in Group II, and 2/2 (100%) eyes in Group III developed recurrence of macular edema with worsening of visual acuity at 6 and 9 months, respectively. Thirty-three (40.7%) eyes developed IOP elevation (at least one reading > 24 mmHg). One eye developed infective endophthalmitis. Conclusions Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide may be considered as an effective treatment for reducing macular thickening due to diffuse diabetic macular edema, venous occlusion associated macular edema, and may result in increase in visual acuity at least in the short term. Further follow-up and analysis is required to demonstrate its long-term efficacy.

Intravitreal slow-releasing dexamethasone implant for idiopathic neuroretinitis

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212095307
Author(s):  
Osman Çekiç ◽  
Samet Gülkaş
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Optic Disc ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Dexamethasone Implant ◽  
Optic Disc Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant ◽  
Optic Disc Swelling ◽  
Intravitreal Dexamethasone

Introduction: The purpose of this report is to describe a successful management of idiopathic neuroretinitis with intravitreal dexamethasone implant. Method: Interventional case report. Clinical Case: A 34-year-old man with an acute painless unilateral vision loss, optic disc swelling, and a macular edema was diagnosed as idiopathic neuroretinitis, and he underwent 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreous implant injection. Macular edema responded quickly and visual acuity improved from 20/50 to 20/25 within 2 weeks and to 20/20 within a month. One month after the injection, optic disc edema disappeared. No recurrence occurred and visual acuity was stable at 20/20 during 3 years of follow-up. Conclusion: Idiopathic neuroretinitis can be treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant.

Rapid response to dexamethasone intravitreal implant in diabetic macular edema

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lo Giudice ◽  
Antonio Avarello ◽  
Gianluca Campana ◽  
Alessandro Galan
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Clinical Series ◽  
Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Early Effects ◽  
Sd Oct

Purpose: To evaluate the early effects of dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implants in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm, interventional clinical series. Eighteen patients (18 eyes) with chronic/recalcitrant or naive DME were included. Patients underwent single DEX intravitreal implant. Clinical assessments, including ophthalmologic examination, central retinal thickness (CRT) measurement by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scan, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were carried out at baseline, 1-3 hours, and then 3, 7, and 30 days after treatment. The main outcome was change in CRT on SD-OCT, while secondary outcome measures included visual acuity (VA) and changes in IOP following implant. Results: Mean CRT significantly decreased from 565 ± 171 µm at baseline to 310 ± 89 µm at end of follow-up (p<0.001), with reduction becoming evident 1-3 hours after injection. Mean BCVA also significantly improved 7 days and 30 days after treatment up to 0.14 logMAR (p<0.05). All patients had a controlled IOP after the injection with only 1/18 eyes having a transient increase in IOP during follow-up. Conclusions: This is the first study showing very early effects of DEX implants on CRT reduction and VA improvement in DME.

Ranibizumab for Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema after Bevacizumab Treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Katz ◽  
Elad Moisseiev ◽  
Dafna Goldenberg ◽  
Joseph Moisseiev ◽  
Yosef Lomnicky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Thickness ◽  
Significant Gain ◽  
Bevacizumab Treatment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of switching from bevacizumab to ranibizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods This was a retrospective study of patients with DME initially treated with bevacizumab and switched to ranibizumab. Visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were retrieved at fixed timepoints prior to and after the switch. Results Forty eyes of 32 patients were included in the study. The difference in VA between any of these fixed timepoints was not statistically significant. A significant gain in VA was found in eyes that lost more than 0.1 logMAR during treatment with the last 3 bevacizumab injections. The mean CRT was significantly lower after the first 3 ranibizumab injections and at the final follow-up (p<0.001), a 67 ± 14 μm and 78 ± 18 μm reduction in thickness, respectively. Conclusions Switching to ranibizumab resulted in a significant decrease in the CRT of eyes with DME, and should be considered when there is a lack of response or deterioration while on bevacizumab injections. A significant gain in VA was observed in a subgroup of eyes that lost more than one line while receiving the last 3 bevacizumab injections prior to the switch.

scholarly journals Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for macular edema: a pilot study in a public health center

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (Suppl.3) ◽  
pp. e020104
Author(s):  
Maria Júlia Izzo Crespo ◽  
Cristina Nery Carbajo ◽  
Glaucia Luciano da Veiga ◽  
Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca ◽  
Vagner Loduca Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Cross Sectional

Introduction: Macula edema consists in one of the most common causes of visual impairment. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuous release of 0.7 mg dexamethasone (using implantable device) for treatment of macular edema. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study of 16 patients treated with 0.7 mg dexamethasone intraocular implant. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure and central macular thickness were recorded at baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-up. Results: 15 eyes of 13 patients were included. Most eyes (n=9) improve visual acuity from baseline at 1-month follow-up; this improvement persisted through 3-monyh follow-up in six eyes. The central macular thickness decreased in the majority of the subjects at 1-month (n=12) and at 3-month (n=10) follow-up. Three eyes presented with elevated intraocular pressure. Conclusion: Dexamethasone implant can both reduce the risk of vision loss and improve anatomical features of macular edema due to several pathologies studied. This implant may be used safely and should be considered a therapeutic option to Brazilian Public Health System.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document