Effect of Early Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Health-care Utilization and Health Status in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Exacerbations of COPD

CHEST Journal ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (4) ◽  
pp. 864A
Author(s):  
Fanny W. Ko ◽  
Dai L. David ◽  
Jenny C. Ngai ◽  
Alvin Tung ◽  
Susanna Ng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Health Care Utilization ◽  
Pulmonary Rehabilitation ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Acute Exacerbations

scholarly journals Health status and health care utilization after discharge from geriatric in-hospital stay – description of a register-based study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Rydwik ◽  
R. Lindqvist ◽  
C. Willers ◽  
L. Carlsson ◽  
G. H. Nilsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Health Care Utilization ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Healthcare Data ◽  
Utilization Data ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Socioeconomic Data

Abstract Background This study is the first part of a register-based research program with the overall aim to increase the knowledge of the health status among geriatric patients and to identify risk factors for readmission in this population. The aim of this study was two-fold: 1) to evaluate the validity of the study cohorts in terms of health care utilization in relation to regional cohorts; 2) to describe the study cohorts in terms of health status and health care utilization after discharge. Methods The project consist of two cohorts with data from patient records of geriatric in-hospital stays, health care utilization data from Stockholm Regional Healthcare Data Warehouse 6 months after discharge, socioeconomic data from Statistics Sweden. The 2012 cohort include 6710 patients and the 2016 cohort, 8091 patients; 64% are women, mean age is 84 (SD 8). Results Mean days to first visit in primary care was 12 (23) and 10 (19) in the 2012 and 2016 cohort, respectively. Readmissions to hospital was 38% in 2012 and 39% in 2016. The validity of the study cohorts was evaluated by comparing them with regional cohorts. The study cohorts were comparable in most cases but there were some significant differences between the study cohorts and the regional cohorts, especially regarding amount and type of primary care. Conclusion The study cohorts seem valid in terms of health care utilization compared to the regional cohorts regarding hospital care, but less so regarding primary care. This will be considered in the analyses and when interpreting data in future studies based on these study cohorts. Future studies will explore factors associated with health status and re-admissions in a population with multi-morbidity and disability.

Telemedicine, the effect of nurse-initiated telephone follow up, on health status and health-care utilization in COPD patients: A randomized trial

Respirology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farida F. Berkhof ◽  
Jan W.K. van den Berg ◽  
Steven M. Uil ◽  
Huib A.M. Kerstjens
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Health Care Utilization ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Copd Patients

scholarly journals Health Status, Health Insurance, and Health Care Utilization Patterns of Immigrant Black Men

2003 ◽  
Vol 93 (10) ◽  
pp. 1740-1747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline W. Lucas ◽  
Daheia J. Barr-Anderson ◽  
Raynard S. Kington
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Health Care Utilization ◽  
Black Men ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Utilization Patterns

scholarly journals Prevalence and Determinants of Pain and Pain-Related Disability in Urban and Rural Settings in Southeastern Ontario

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean A Tripp ◽  
Elizabeth G VanDenKerkhof ◽  
Margo McAlister
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Health Care Utilization ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Pain Interference ◽  
Urban Region ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
The Past ◽  
Pain Prevalence

BACKGROUND: Canadian chronic pain prevalence estimates range from 11% to 66%, are affected by sampling and measurement bias, and largely represent urban settings.OBJECTIVES: To estimate chronic pain prevalence and factors associated with pain in southeastern Ontario, a region with a larger rural than urban residence.METHODS: A systematic sampling with a random start was used to contact households. A telephone-administered questionnaire using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale, with questions on health care and medication use, health status, depression and demographics, was administered to consenting adults (18 to 94 years of age; mean age 50.2±16.6 years).RESULTS: The response rate was 49% (1067 of 2167), with 76% reporting some pain over the past six months. Low pain intensity with low pain interference prevalence was 34% (grade I), high pain intensity with low pain interference was 26% (grade II), and high pain intensity with high pain interference was 17% (grades III and IV). Of those reporting pain, 49% reported chronic pain (ie, pain for a minimum of 90 days over the past six months) representing 37% of the sample. Being female, unmarried, lower income, poorer self-reported health status and rural residence were associated with increasing pain. Once depression was considered in this pain analysis, residence was no longer significant. Lower rates of health care utilization were reported by rural residents. In those reporting the highest pain grades, poor health, greater medication and health care use, depression and more pain sites were associated with higher odds for pain-related disability.CONCLUSION: There is an elevated prevalence of pain in this almost equally split rural/urban region. Further examination of health care utilization and depression is suggested in chronic pain prevalence research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document