Comparison of Work of Breathing on High Gas Flow and Demand Valve Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Systems

CHEST Journal ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 692-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Noel Gibney ◽  
Roger S. Wilson ◽  
Henning Pontoppidan
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1051-1051
Author(s):  
John Kattwinkel

The paper by Goldman et al (Pediatrics 64:160, 1979) comparing the mechanics of breathing in neonates treated with nasal vs mask continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) recommends that, since nasal CPAP appeared to increase the work of breathing, "other methods be considered for the delivery of CDP (continuous distending pressure)." As a strong proponent of nasal CPAP, I would like to express several concerns with the study and its interpretation. First, according to the authors' drawing, the nasal device used for the study had been modified with a PE 20 sampling catheter inserted through one of the prongs.


1994 ◽  
Vol 81 (SUPPLEMENT) ◽  
pp. A273 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Messinger ◽  
M. J. Banner ◽  
A. Gabrielli ◽  
A. J. Layon ◽  
T. J. Gallagher

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 682-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. B. Pandit ◽  
S. E. Courtney ◽  
K. H. Pyon ◽  
J. G. Saslow ◽  
R. H. Habib

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document