Transitional Care Cut Hospital Readmissions For North Carolina Medicaid Patients With Complex Chronic Conditions

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1407-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos T. Jackson ◽  
Troy K. Trygstad ◽  
Darren A. DeWalt ◽  
C. Annette DuBard
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Complex Chronic Conditions

Individual and Organizational Factors Associated With Hospital Readmission Rates: Evidence From a U.S. National Sample

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1153-1158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyaien O. Conner ◽  
Hongdao Meng ◽  
Victoria Marino ◽  
Timothy L. Boaz
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Organizational Factors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Important Indicator ◽  
Increased Risk

Objective: Hospital readmission rate is an important indicator for assessing quality of care in the acute and postacute settings. Identifying factors that increase risk for hospital readmissions can aid in the recognition of potential targets for quality improvement efforts. The main objective of this brief report was to examine the factors that predict increased risk of 30-day readmissions. Method: We analyzed data from the 2013 National Readmission Database (NRD). Results: The main factors that predicted increased risk of 30-day readmission were number of chronic conditions, severity of illness, mortality risk, and hospital ownership. Unexpectedly, discharge from a for-profit hospital was associated with greater risk for hospital readmission in the United States. Discussion and Conclusion: These findings suggest that patients with severe physical illness and multiple chronic conditions should be the primary targets for hospital transitional care interventions to help reduce the rate of unnecessary hospital readmissions.

Nurses’ Experiences of Transitional Care in Multiple Chronic Conditions

2021 ◽  
pp. 108482232110021
Author(s):  
Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi ◽  
Leila Mardanian Dehkordi ◽  
Fariba Taleghani
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Continuity Of Care ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Major Elements ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Levels Of Care

Transitional care is a designed plan to ensure the continuity of care received by patients as they transfer between different locations or levels of care. The aim of this paper is to explore nurses’ experiences of transitional care in multiple chronic conditions. A qualitative method with a conventional content analysis approach was utilized. The study was conducted at university hospitals in 2 big cities (Isfahan and Tehran) of Iran. This study is performed from November 2018 to December 2019 using deep, semi-structured, and face-to-face interviews which are focused on nurses’ experiences of transitional care. Data collection continued until saturation was reached. Finally, 15 nurses take part in this study. Data collection and data analysis were conducted concurrently. Data were analyzed using Graneheim and Lundman’s techniques. Two main themes providing a descriptive summary of the major elements of transitional care identified: “threat to patient safety” and “Care breakdown”. Findings showed an exclusive image of unsafe transitional care which was done unplanned without appropriate delegating care to family and threat patient safety. There is still a gap in the transition from hospital to home. Nursing managers can address this issue by creating a culture of teamwork, training competent nurses by continuum education, and more supervision of nursing care. Policymakers can ensure continuity of care by developing policies and programs about transitional care.

scholarly journals Palliative care and complex chronic conditions since the perspective of healthcare professionals

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Doñate-Martínez ◽  
L Llop ◽  
J Garcés
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Holistic View ◽  
Complex Chronic Conditions ◽  
Symptom Intensity

Abstract Background According to the WHO, palliative care (PC) is applicable early in the course of illness together with other curative therapies. Early PC has demonstrated beneficial effects on quality of life and symptom intensity among cancer patients. However, PC is not as early integrated on the care pathway of complex chronic conditions (CCC). This abstract presents barriers and needs identified to effectively implement early PC on CCC performed under the EU-funded InAdvance project (ref.: 825750). Methods Semi-structured interviews were performed with 16 healthcare professionals (HPs) from primary care and hospital settings working with older patients with CCC in Valencia (Spain). Results Interviews reported that main needs identified to provide early PC are: (a) coordinated strategies between multi-setting HPs to an early identification of CCC patients in need of PC; (b) adequate resources to attend patients' PC needs from a holistic view, i.e. psychosocial and spiritual needs; and (c) early integration of basic PC at primary care teams. The main barriers identified were: (a) stereotypes associated to the traditional PC approach; (b) poor knowledge from HPs of the PC holistic approach; and (c) lack of specific protocols or pathways for CCC in need of PC. Conclusions Specific skills and resources are the most relevant needs to effectively provide early PC among patients with CCC. First, it is urgent to demystify the negative culture-related vision of PC that is commonly associated to sedation and last days of a person's life. Also, multidisciplinary HPs require specific training to identify and provide early PC tailored to CCC. And, it is required a strategic and multi-setting organizational approach with fluent information flow and coordinated roles. Key messages Healthcare expenditure would be considerably reduced, especially at hospital and emergency units, with an early identification of patients with CCC in need of PC. Empowering primary HPs in PC would improve the quality of care of patients with CCC.

Outpatient Follow-up Care After Hospital Discharge of Children With Complex Chronic Conditions at a Rural Tertiary Care Hospital

2021 ◽  
pp. 000992282110472
Author(s):  
Andrew Brown ◽  
Mary Quaile ◽  
Hannah Morris ◽  
Dmitry Tumin ◽  
Clayten L. Parker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Complex Chronic Conditions

Objective To determine factors associated with completion of recommended outpatient follow-up visits in children with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) following hospital discharge. Methods We retrospectively identified children aged 1 to 17 years diagnosed with a CCC who were discharged from our rural tertiary care children’s hospital between 2017 and 2018 with a diagnosis meeting published CCC criteria. Patients discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit and patients enrolled in a care coordination program for technology-dependent children were excluded. Results Of 113 eligible patients, 77 (68%) had outpatient follow-up consistent with discharge instructions. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission ( P = .020) and prolonged length of stay ( P = .004) were associated with decreased likelihood of completing recommended follow-up. Conclusions Among children with CCCs who were not already enrolled in a care coordination program, ICU admission was associated with increased risk of not completing recommended outpatient follow-up. This population could be targeted for expanded care coordination efforts.

scholarly journals A Scoping Review and Thematic Classification of Patient Complexity: Offering a Unifying Framework

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis K. Schaink ◽  
Kerry Kuluski ◽  
Renée F. Lyons ◽  
Martin Fortin ◽  
Alejandro R. Jadad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Modern Medicine ◽  
Complex Chronic Conditions ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Payment Schemes ◽  
Important Health ◽  
The Face ◽  
Patient Complexity ◽  
Important Health Issue

The path to improving healthcare quality for individuals with complex health conditions is complicated by a lack of common understanding of complexity. Modern medicine, together with social and environmental factors, has extended life, leading to a growing population of patients with chronic conditions. In many cases, there are social and psychological factors that impact treatment, health outcomes, and quality of life. This is the face of complexity. Care challenges, burden, and cost have positioned complexity as an important health issue. Complex chronic conditions are now being discussed by clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers around such issues as quantification, payment schemes, transitions, management models, clinical practice, and improved patient experience. We conducted a scoping review of the literature for definitions and descriptions of complexity. We provide an overview of complex chronic conditions, and what is known about complexity, and describe variations in how it is understood. We developed a Complexity Framework from these findings to guide our approach to understanding patient complexity. It is critical to use common vernacular and conceptualization of complexity to improve service and outcomes for patients with complex chronic conditions. Many questions still persist about how to develop this work with a health and social care lens; our framework offers a foundation to structure thinking about complex patients. Further insight into patient complexity can inform treatment models and goals of care, and identify required services and barriers to the management of complexity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document