Motor Development of Triplets: A Japanese Prospective Cohort Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshie Yokoyama ◽  
Masako Sugimoto ◽  
Yu Miyake ◽  
Jun Sono ◽  
Kenge Mizukami ◽  
...  

We analyzed whether motor development in early life is different between singletons and triplets in Japan. The motor development was reported by mothers by postal questionnaire for 1,121 triplet children and in regular health check-ups for 13,906 singleton children. Children who were suspected of having neurological abnormality or disability were excluded from the analysis. The ages of milestone achievements were significantly higher in triplets for each outcome compared to singletons. Further, after adjustment for gestational age, birthweight, and birth length, the differences were significant for maintaining head, sitting alone and standing holding on. In children with birthweight of 2 kg or more, the ages of milestone achievements were significantly higher in triplets for each outcome compared to singletons, except walking holding on. Moreover, after adjustment for the confounding factors, the differences were significant for sitting alone and walking independently. On the contrary, singletons attained motor development facilitating crawling, walking holding on, and walking independently slower than triplets among those children with birthweight of 2 kg or less after adjustment for gestational age. In conclusion, triplets are overall at higher risk for the delay of gross motor milestones as compared to singletons independently of birth-related factors. In contrast, among children with a birthweight of less than 2 kg, singletons showed slower motor development than triplets after adjusting for gestational age. There is an obvious need to apply developmental standards that consider at least both multiple birth status (singleton, twin or triplet) and birthweight.

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshie Yokoyama ◽  
Saeko Wada ◽  
Masako Sugimoto ◽  
Miyuki Saito ◽  
Miyoko Matsubara ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study was performed using population-based data to analyze whether motor development in early life is different between singletons and twins in Japan. For better comparison and investigation, we divided the 2 groups into a group with a birthweight of 2.5 kg or greater (subgroup A) and a group with a birthweight of less than 2.5 kg (subgroup B), respectively. We analyzed the database of medical check-ups for children aged 3 years between April 2001 and July 2004. They received medical checkups at 4 months, 1.5, and 3 years of age. Children who were suspected of having neurological abnormality or disability were referred to specialists and excluded from the database. The data of 14,132 children were analyzed. Among these, 13,040 (92.3%) children were singletons in subgroup A, 75 (0.5%) were twins in subgroup A, 866 (6.1%) were singletons in subgroup B and 151 (1.1%) were twins in subgroup B. The mean age at achieving milestones was slower in twins of subgroup A for each developmental outcome than singletons of subgroup A, and the difference between twins and singletons was significant after adjustment for rolling over. On the contrary, after adjusting for a confounding factor (gestational age), singletons of subgroup B attained motor development facilitating walking independently slower than twins of subgroup B. There were different tendencies in the results regarding the motor development of subjects of subgroup A and that of subjects of subgroup B.


BMJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. j1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colm P Travers ◽  
Reese H Clark ◽  
Alan R Spitzer ◽  
Abhik Das ◽  
Thomas J Garite ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. S24-S25
Author(s):  
Eva van der Vlugt ◽  
Petra Verburg ◽  
Shalem Leemaqz ◽  
Lesley Mccowan ◽  
Lucilla Poston ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Célia Amorim-Costa ◽  
A. Rita Gaio ◽  
Diogo Ayres-de-Campos ◽  
João Bernardes

AbstractObjective:To compare longitudinal trends of cardiotocographic (CTG) parameters between small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and normal fetuses, from 24 to 41 weeks of pregnancy.Methods:A prospective cohort study was carried out in singleton pregnancies without fetal malformations. At least one CTG was performed in each of the following intervals: 24–26 weeks+6 days, 27–29 weeks+6 days, 30–32 weeks+6 days, 33–35 weeks+6 days, 36–38 weeks+6 days and ≥39 weeks. Tracings were analyzed using the Omniview-SisPortoResults:A total of 176 fetuses (31 SGA) and 1256 tracings (207 from SGA fetuses) were evaluated. All CTG parameters changed significantly throughout pregnancy in the three groups, with a decreasing baseline and probability of decelerations, and an increasing average long-term variability (LTV), average short-term variability (STV) and accelerations. Baseline showed a more pronounced decrease (steeper slope) in SGA fetuses, being higher in these cases at earlier gestational ages and lower later in pregnancy. Average LTV was significantly lower in SGA<p3 fetuses, but a parallel increase occurred in all groups. There was a considerable inter-fetal variability within each group.Conclusion:A unique characterization of CTG trends throughout gestation in SGA fetuses was provided. A steeper descent of the baseline was reported for the first time. The findings raise the possibility of clinical application of computerized CTG analysis in screening and management of fetal growth restriction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document