A Systematic Review of Early Prognostic Factors for Return to Work After Traumatic Brain Injury

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Nightingale ◽  
Cheryl A. Soo ◽  
Robyn L. Tate

AbstractThis article presents a systematic review identifying variables and their prognostic value for return to work (RTW) after traumatic brain injury (TBI). RTW has been identified as being a key goal following TBI, with estimates ranging from 10% to 70%. Prediction of postinjury employment is important for planning rehabilitation and structuring individualised vocational services. Studies examining prognostic factors were identified by searching four electronic databases, until June 2006. Searches yielded 1948 studies of which 55 met inclusion criteria and were subsequently rated for methodological quality. Mean methodological score for included studies was 3.9/6 (SD 0.9, range 1–6). Analysis focused on a subset of 27 studies which provided sampling from all three domains of preinjury, injury and early postinjury variables. Few studies considered preinjury variables, apart from simple demographics. Only five studies considered preinjury employment, which was a significant predictor in each case. Severity of injury variables were invariably examined, but were significant predictors in only 8/27 studies (30%). For early postinjury variables, 14/27 studies entered cognitive variables with 12/14 (86%) identifying them as significant predictors; 3/27 studies examined neurophysical variables, with 2/3 (67%) studies finding them significant; and 12/27 studies examined multidimensional/participation variables which were statistically significant individual predictors in 8/12 (67%) cases. The results are discussed in the context of methodological issues encountered during the course of the review that require addressing in future studies.

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 450-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Schultz ◽  
Robyn L. Tate

Background: Previous research addressing cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in adults has predominately used cross-sectional methods. This systematic review examines longitudinal research into cognitive recovery in the first 2 years following moderate-to-severe TBI in adults and aims to identify apparent methodological issues with the existing literature.Design: Systematic review of the first 2 years post-trauma.Setting: Data were extracted from three electronic databases and manual searches of published articles until October 2012.Participants: Two hundred and forty-two participants with severe TBI and 281 comparison participants were used to calculate effect sizes.Results: Twenty papers met the selection criteria, with effect sizes computed from four studies. Moderate-to-large effect sizes were initially observed between the TBI and comparison groups on most measures (range: d = 0.2–2.8). Recovery continued in all five cognitive domains over the 2 years post-injury.Conclusions: Results demonstrated that cognitive recovery was continuous throughout the first 2 years following moderate-to-severe TBI. Findings also indicated different rates of recovery for the specific cognitive domains, highlighting the heterogeneous nature of cognitive recovery after TBI. The review highlighted several methodological issues within the limited existing literature; recommendations were developed to improve the evidence base.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
McKenzie Seaton, LAT, ATC, MSRT Student ◽  
Victoria DeFazio, CTRS ◽  
Heather R. Porter, PhD, CTRS

The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the efficacy of anger management interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A total of 4,178 articles were identified of which six met the inclusion criteria. Anger management interventions included TBI education, anger education, emotional recognition, support, and maintenance of an anger log. Data were collected on eight outcomes (trait anger, anger expression-out, anger control, self-reported aggressiveness, anger recognition strategies, well-being, self-reported anger, and treatment satisfaction) with mixed findings. Suggestions for recreational therapy practice are provided. Further research is needed, particularly for the pediatric and adolescent TBI population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 198-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatyana Mollayeva ◽  
Shirin Mollayeva ◽  
Nicole Pacheco ◽  
Andrea D’Souza ◽  
Angela Colantonio

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e041581
Author(s):  
Reema Shafi ◽  
Angela Colantonio

IntroductionReturning to work and sustaining employment can be a significant challenge for traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors. Within the literature, there is recurring support for the role of workplace accommodations in effective and early return-to-work (RTW). To date, however, there has been a lack of systematic reviews exploring the specific role of workplace accommodations within the context of RTW after TBI. The primary objective of this protocol is to outline the methodological approach that will be undertaken to systematically review the literature and to assess the effectiveness of workplace accommodations in facilitating RTW.Methods and analysisA total of nine databases will be searched systematically using the concepts ‘Brain injury,’ ‘RTW’ and ‘Job Accommodations.’ Study selection will be performed independently by three reviewers, based on predetermined eligibility criteria through two rounds of screening using, first, the title and abstract, followed by a full-text search. Extracted information will include the study’s purpose, design, and setting; the data source and type; the severity of TBI and the diagnostic criterion used; a comprehensive description of the intervention provided; the RTW outcome variables and the statistical methods used, etc. The data will be tabulated and narratively synthesised. Systematic review registration: This protocol has been registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.Ethics and disseminationAs this review intends to use pre-existing published studies hence research ethics board approvals will not be required. Nevertheless, this review will follow the ethical and governance standards in the data management and presentation of results. The findings from this review will potentially be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal (electronically and in print). The results of this review will be presented at both national/international conferences and shared with stakeholders influencing RTW practices.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016043517.


Brain Injury ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. van Velzen ◽  
C. A. M. van Bennekom ◽  
M. J. A. Edelaar ◽  
J. K. Sluiter ◽  
M. H. W. Frings-Dresen

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn W. Graham ◽  
Michael D. West ◽  
Jessica L. Bourdon ◽  
Katherine J. Inge ◽  
Hannah E. Seward

Brain Injury ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 1623-1636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Bloom ◽  
Stephen Thomas ◽  
Jette Møller Ahrensberg ◽  
Rachel Weaver ◽  
Alex Fowler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document