scholarly journals Genotyping of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms by High-Resolution Melting of Small Amplicons

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1156-1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Liew ◽  
Robert Pryor ◽  
Robert Palais ◽  
Cindy Meadows ◽  
Maria Erali ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: High-resolution melting of PCR amplicons with the DNA dye LCGreen™ I was recently introduced as a homogeneous, closed-tube method of genotyping that does not require probes or real-time PCR. We adapted this system to genotype single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) after rapid-cycle PCR (12 min) of small amplicons (≤50 bp). Methods: Engineered plasmids were used to study all possible SNP base changes. In addition, clinical protocols for factor V (Leiden) 1691G>A, prothrombin 20210G>A, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 1298A>C, hemochromatosis (HFE) 187C>G, and β-globin (hemoglobin S) 17A>T were developed. LCGreen I was included in the reaction mixture before PCR, and high-resolution melting was obtained within 2 min after amplification. Results: In all cases, heterozygotes were easily identified because heteroduplexes altered the shape of the melting curves. Approximately 84% of human SNPs involve a base exchange between A::T and G::C base pairs, and the homozygotes are easily genotyped by melting temperatures (Tms) that differ by 0.8–1.4 °C. However, in ∼16% of SNPs, the bases only switch strands and preserve the base pair, producing very small Tm differences between homozygotes (<0.4 °C). Although most of these cases can be genotyped by Tm, one-fourth (4% of total SNPs) show nearest-neighbor symmetry, and, as predicted, the homozygotes cannot be resolved from each other. In these cases, adding 15% of a known homozygous genotype to unknown samples allows melting curve separation of all three genotypes. This approach was used for the HFE 187C>G protocol, but, as predicted from the sequence changes, was not needed for the other four clinical protocols. Conclusions: SNP genotyping by high-resolution melting analysis is simple, rapid, and inexpensive, requiring only PCR, a DNA dye, and melting instrumentation. The method is closed-tube, performed without probes or real-time PCR, and can be completed in less than 2 min after completion of PCR.

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 1328-1335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luming Zhou ◽  
Alexander N Myers ◽  
Joshua G Vandersteen ◽  
Lesi Wang ◽  
Carl T Wittwer

Abstract Background: Homogeneous PCR methods for genotyping usually require fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes. Amplicon melting with the DNA dye LCGreen™ I was recently introduced as a closed-tube method of genotyping that does not require probes or real-time PCR. However, some single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) could not be completely genotyped without addition of a known genotype, and high-resolution melting techniques were necessary. Methods: A 3′-blocked, unlabeled oligonucleotide probe and the saturating dye, LCGreen I, were added to standard PCR reagents before amplification. After PCR, the samples were melted at 0.1–0.3 °C/s in high-resolution (HR-1™), high-throughput (LightTyper™), and rapid-cycle, real-time (LightCycler®) instruments, and fluorescence melting curves were recorded. Results: Derivative melting curves of the probe–target duplexes were characteristic of the genotype under the probe. With synthetic plasmid templates, all SNP base combinations could be genotyped. For human genomic DNA, the technique was demonstrated with mutations associated with cystic fibrosis, including SNPs (G542X, I506V, and F508C) and 3-bp deletions (F508del and I507del). Conclusions: Genotyping of SNPs and small deletions by melting analysis of an unlabeled probe in the presence of LCGreen I is simple and rapid. Only three unlabeled oligonucleotides (two primers and one probe), a saturating DNA dye, PCR, and a melting instrument are required. The method is closed-tube, does not require fluorescently labeled probes or real-time PCR, and can be completed in <10 min on any instrument capable of monitoring melting curves by fluorescence.


2005 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara Čačev ◽  
Mladen Jokić ◽  
Radan Spaventi ◽  
Krešimir Pavelić ◽  
Sanja Kapitanović

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Petersen ◽  
Ulla Vogel ◽  
Eszter Rockenbauer ◽  
Kirsten Vang Nielsen ◽  
Steen Kølvraa ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 2474-2474
Author(s):  
J. T. Foster ◽  
R. T. Okinaka ◽  
R. Svensson ◽  
K. Shaw ◽  
B. K. De ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document