scholarly journals The ETS transcription factor ELF1 regulates a broadly antiviral program distinct from the type I interferon response

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e1007634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon Louis Seifert ◽  
Clara Si ◽  
Debjani Saha ◽  
Mohammad Sadic ◽  
Maren de Vries ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon Louis Seifert ◽  
Clara Si ◽  
Sarah Ballentine ◽  
Debjani Saha ◽  
Maren de Vries ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe transcription of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) is classically triggered via activation of the JAK-STAT pathway, and together, ISGs raise a multifaceted antiviral barrier. An increasing body of evidence reports the existence of additional, non-canonical pathways and transcription factors that coordinate ISG expression. Detailed knowledge of how heterogenous mechanisms regulate ISG expression is crucial for the rational design of drugs targeting the type I interferon response. Here, we characterize the first ETS transcription factor family member as a regulator of non-canonical ISG expression: E74-like ETS transcription factor 1 (ELF1). Using high-content microscopy to quantify viral infection over time, we found that ELF1, itself an ISG, inhibits eight diverse RNA and DNA viruses uniquely at multi-cycle replication. ELF1 did not regulate expression of type I or II interferons, and ELF1’s antiviral effect was not abolished by the absence of STAT1 or by inhibition of JAK phosphorylation. Accordingly, comparative expression analyses by RNAseq revealed that the ELF1 transcriptional program is distinct from, and delayed with respect to, the immediate interferon response. Finally, knockdown experiments demonstrated that ELF1 is a critical component of the antiviral interferon response in vitro and in vivo. Our findings reveal a previously overlooked mechanism of non-canonical ISG regulation that both amplifies and prolongs the initial interferon response by expressing broadly antiviral restriction factors.AUTHOR SUMMARYOver 60 years after their discovery, we still struggle to understand exactly how interferons inhibit viruses. Our gap in knowledge stems, on one hand, from the sheer number of interferon-stimulated effector genes, of which only few have been characterized in mechanistic detail. On the other hand, our knowledge of interferon-regulated gene transcription is constantly evolving. We know that different regulatory mechanisms greatly influence the quality, magnitude, and timing of interferon-stimulated gene expression, all of which may contribute to the antiviral mechanism of interferons. Deciphering these regulatory mechanisms is indispensable for understanding this critical first line of host defense, and for harnessing the power of interferons in novel antiviral therapies. Here, we report a novel mechanism of interferon-induced gene regulation by an interferon-stimulated gene, which, paradoxically, inhibits viruses in the absence of additional interferon signaling: E74-like ETS transcription factor 1 (ELF1) raises an unusually delayed antiviral program that potently restricts propagation of all viruses tested in our study. Reduced levels of ELF1 significantly diminished interferon-mediated host defenses against influenza A virus in vitro and in vivo, suggesting a critical but previously overlooked role in the type I interferon response. The transcriptional program raised by ELF1 is vast and comprises over 400 potentially antiviral genes, which are almost entirely distinct from those known to be induced by interferon. Taken together, our data provide evidence for a critical secondary wave of antiviral protection that adds both “quality” and “time” to the type I interferon response.


Proceedings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Samuel Connell ◽  
Ana Reis ◽  
Anusyah Rathakrishnan ◽  
Sarah Gilbert ◽  
Linda Dixon

African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) is a haemorrhagic infection of swine, which routinelydisplays 100% lethality. [...]


Author(s):  
Lai Wei ◽  
Siqi Ming ◽  
Bin Zou ◽  
Yongjian Wu ◽  
Zhongsi Hong ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena N. Judd ◽  
Alison R. Gilchrist ◽  
Nicholas R. Meyerson ◽  
Sara L. Sawyer

Abstract Background The Type I interferon response is an important first-line defense against viruses. In turn, viruses antagonize (i.e., degrade, mis-localize, etc.) many proteins in interferon pathways. Thus, hosts and viruses are locked in an evolutionary arms race for dominance of the Type I interferon pathway. As a result, many genes in interferon pathways have experienced positive natural selection in favor of new allelic forms that can better recognize viruses or escape viral antagonists. Here, we performed a holistic analysis of selective pressures acting on genes in the Type I interferon family. We initially hypothesized that the genes responsible for inducing the production of interferon would be antagonized more heavily by viruses than genes that are turned on as a result of interferon. Our logic was that viruses would have greater effect if they worked upstream of the production of interferon molecules because, once interferon is produced, hundreds of interferon-stimulated proteins would activate and the virus would need to counteract them one-by-one. Results We curated multiple sequence alignments of primate orthologs for 131 genes active in interferon production and signaling (herein, “induction” genes), 100 interferon-stimulated genes, and 100 randomly chosen genes. We analyzed each multiple sequence alignment for the signatures of recurrent positive selection. Counter to our hypothesis, we found the interferon-stimulated genes, and not interferon induction genes, are evolving significantly more rapidly than a random set of genes. Interferon induction genes evolve in a way that is indistinguishable from a matched set of random genes (22% and 18% of genes bear signatures of positive selection, respectively). In contrast, interferon-stimulated genes evolve differently, with 33% of genes evolving under positive selection and containing a significantly higher fraction of codons that have experienced selection for recurrent replacement of the encoded amino acid. Conclusion Viruses may antagonize individual products of the interferon response more often than trying to neutralize the system altogether.


Author(s):  
Letizia Santinelli ◽  
Gabriella De Girolamo ◽  
Cristian Borrazzo ◽  
Paolo Vassalini ◽  
Claudia Pinacchio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document