scholarly journals Impact of advance care planning on dying in hospital: Evidence from urgent care records

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0242914
Author(s):  
Martina Orlovic ◽  
Tom Callender ◽  
Julia Riley ◽  
Ara Darzi ◽  
Joanne Droney
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Advance Care

Place of death is an important outcome of end-of-life care. Many people do not have the opportunity to express their wishes and die in their preferred place of death. Advance care planning (ACP) involves discussion, decisions and documentation about how an individual contemplates their future death. Recording end-of-life preferences gives patients a sense of control over their future. Coordinate My Care (CMC) is London’s largest electronic palliative care register designed to provide effective ACP, with information being shared with urgent care providers. The aim of this study is to explore determinants of dying in hospital. Understanding advance plans and their outcomes can help in understanding the potential effects that implementation of electronic palliative care registers can have on the end-of-life care provided. Retrospective observational cohort analysis included 21,231 individuals aged 18 or older with a Coordinate My Care plan who had died between March 2011 and July 2019 with recorded place of death. Logistic regression was used to explore demographic and end-of-life preference factors associated with hospital deaths. 22% of individuals died in hospital and 73% have achieved preferred place of death. Demographic characteristics and end-of-life preferences have impact on dying in hospital, with the latter having the strongest influence. The likelihood of in-hospital death is substantially higher in patients without documented preferred place of death (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.26–1.62, p<0.001), in those who prefer to die in hospital (OR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.60–3.30, p<0.001) and who prefer to be cared in hospital (OR = 2.77, 95% CI 1.94–3.96, p<0.001). “Not for resuscitation” individuals (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.37–0.50, p<0.001) and who preferred symptomatic treatment (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.33–0.40, p<0.001) had a lower likelihood of in-hospital death. Effective advance care planning is necessary for improved end-of-life outcomes and should be included in routine clinical care. Electronic palliative care registers could empower patients by embedding patients’ wishes and personal circumstances in their care plans that are accessible by urgent care providers.

IMPROVING END-OF-LIFE CARE AND ADVANCE CARE PLANNING FOR FRAIL OLDER ADULTS IN CANADA

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
J. Downar ◽  
P. Moorhouse ◽  
R. Goldman ◽  
D. Grossman ◽  
S. Sinha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Frail Older Adults ◽  
Key Concepts ◽  
Advance Care

We present five Key Concepts that describe priorities for improving end-of-life care for frail older adults in Canada, and recommendations based on each Key Concept. Key Concept #1: Our end-of-life care system is focused on cancer, not frailty. Key Concept #2: We need better strategies to systematically identify frail older adults who would benefit from a palliative approach. Key Concept #3: The majority of palliative and end-of-life care will be, and should be, provided by clinicians who are not palliative care specialists. Key Concept #4: Organizational change and innovative funding models could deliver far better end-of-life care to frail individuals for less than we are currently spending. Key Concept #5: Improving the quality and quantity of advance care planning for frail older adults could reduce unwanted intensive care and costs at the end of life, and improve the experience for individuals and family members alike.

Outpatient palliative care at a tertiary cancer center: Perceptions, pathways, and pitfalls.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 28-28
Author(s):  
Kavitha Ramchandran ◽  
Sandy Trieu ◽  
Stephanie Harman ◽  
Judy Passaglia ◽  
Janet Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Code Status ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Advance Care

28 Background: To describe an outpatient palliative care program at a quaternary cancer center- Stanford Cancer Institute. Outpatient palliative care (PC) programs are still in their nascency. Best practices are still being developed and key performance metrics are being delineated. This is a description of Stanford Cancer Institute outpatient PC program. Methods: Observational study of the first six months of encounters to the outpatient PC program. Description of potential barriers to launch and growth, as well as description of resources required for continued success. Data evaluated included program volume, referral patterns, advance care planning, symptom assessment and team structure as collected by the clinical team. Results: Initial barriers to program initiation included lack of funding and infrastructure. Additional barriers included coordination between teams, flow of care (patients late for next appointments), and cultural perceptions of palliative care as equal to end of life care. There are 32 referring practitioners to the program. Over the first six months the outpatient PC program has seen growth with volume increasing from 10 consults per month to 26 consults per month for a total of 60 patients. At the time of initial consult, 11 of the 60 patients seen had an advance directive. Only 1 patient had a physician order for life sustaining treatment (POLST). Code status was documented in 21 of the 60 patients. Conclusions: Our program had multiple barriers to launch: perceptions that palliative care equaled end of life care, lack of infrastructure and funding, and difficulty with coordination between teams. With administrative support the program secured funding, developed infrastructure with the assistance of IT, Cancer Center administration, and Care Coordination. Consults now come from a wide range of providers. Based on preliminary data indicating a very low percentage of completion of these tasks by patients on initial consult there is need for outpatient palliative care for advance care planning. Future growth will include continued penetration of the cancer center, increasing volume of consults, and additional assessments of patient satisfaction, symptom improvement, and hospital utilization.

scholarly journals Palliative Care and Advance Care Planning in Pulmonary Hypertension

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles L. Rhee ◽  
Michael Cuttica
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Advance Care

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease with high associated morbidity and mortality despite the development of novel therapies. Palliative care is a multidisciplinary field focused on optimization of quality of life and overall supportive care for patients and their families in the setting of life-limiting illness. Although the benefits of palliative care in oncology are well described, there are few studies regarding the timing and involvement of palliative care in PH patients. In this paper, we describe the importance of longitudinal advance care planning, including suggestions for addressing difficult topics such as end-of-life care, and the role of palliative care providers in helping guide these discussions throughout the course of the illness.

Association Between Advance Directives and Quality of End-of-Life Care (DRAFT)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna S. Zhukovsky
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Advance Care

Advance care planning is a complex process whereby an individual reflects on future care options at the end of life after reflecting on his or her values and goals for care. These values, goals, and preferences are then communicated to key stakeholders in the process (i.e., proxy and surrogate decision-makers, family members, and health care providers). It is unclear how well the completion of advance directives and a written outcome of advance care planning affect desired patient outcomes. In this chapter, a critical review is provided of a mortality follow-back survey that evaluates the association of advance directives with quality of end-of-life care from the perspective of bereaved family members. Study strengths and limitations are described, as are directions for future research.

scholarly journals Palliative Care With Dementia and Family Caregiver Involvement (A Collaborative Symposium between the Hospice, Palliative, and End-of-Life Care and Nursing Care of Older Adults Interest Groups)

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 786-786
Author(s):  
Jenny van der Steen ◽  
Christopher Johnson ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Interest Groups ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advance Care

Abstract This collaborative symposium offered by the Hospice, Palliative, and End-of-Life Care and Nursing Care of Older Adults Interest Groups addresses palliative care including advance care planning considerations for family caregivers and persons with dementia. Family caregivers may need information about palliative and end-of-life care that is specific to the person, the situation or the stage of dementia. This symposium shows information needs also differ by country and setting. Conversations about symptoms, and about current and end-of-life treatment preferences need support from healthcare professionals. The symposium shows results of a study on video recordings with end-of-life preferences and how, as a stand-alone, they may not inform palliative care practice, and integration of information sources for advance care planning is needed. We will also show that a question prompt list with examples of questions to encourage family caregivers to ask healthcare professionals can and should have different contents for different countries as the content reflects socio-cultural differences. In more studies, participants clearly neede information on the disease trajectory and available services. Such needs go beyond need for information on pain and other symptoms, as family caregivers often appreciate opportunities for social activities for persons with dementia. A decision aid study shows that persons with dementia and family caregivers can participate in advance care planning conversations when supported by the right tools. We argue that local client participation is important when developing tools. Overall, the symposium highlights the need for tailored tools to support face-to-face conversations with all stakeholders to encourage person-centred caregiving.

End-of-life care in nursing home settings: Do race or age matter?

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly S. Reynolds ◽  
Laura C. Hanson ◽  
Martha Henderson ◽  
Karen E. Steinhauser
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advance Care

ABSTRACTObjective:One-quarter of all U.S. chronic-disease deaths occur in nursing homes, yet few studies examine palliative care quality in these settings. This study tests whether racial and/or age-based differences in end-of-life care exist in these institutional settings.Methods:We abstracted residents' charts (N = 1133) in 12 nursing homes. Researchers collected data on indicators of palliative care in two domains of care—advance care planning and pain management—and on residents' demographic and health status variables. Analyses tested for differences by race and age.Results:White residents were more likely than minorities to have DNR orders (69.5% vs. 37.3%), living wills (39% vs. 5%), and health care proxies (36.2% vs. 11.8%; p < .001 for each). Advance directives were highly and positively correlated with age. In-depth advance care planning discussions between residents, families, and health care providers were rare for all residents, irrespective of demographic characteristics. Nursing staff considered older residents to have milder and less frequent pain than younger residents. We found no disparities in pain management based on race.Significance of results:To the extent that advance care planning improves care at the end of life, racial minorities in nursing homes are disadvantaged compared to their white fellow residents. Focusing on in-depth discussions of values and goals of care can improve palliative care for all residents and may help to ameliorate racial disparities in end-of-life care. Staff should consider residents of all ages as appropriate recipients of advance care planning efforts and should be cognizant of the fact that individuals of all ages can experience pain. Nursing homes may do a better job than other health care institutions in eliminating racial disparities in pain management.

Advance Care Planning, Palliative Care, and End-of-Life Care

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 489-501
Author(s):  
Elliott Louis Bedford ◽  
Stephen Blaire ◽  
John G. Carney ◽  
Ron Hamel ◽  
J. Daniel Mindling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advance Care

scholarly journals GPs’ perceptions of advance care planning with frail and older people: a qualitative study

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (666) ◽  
pp. e44-e53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Sharp ◽  
Alexandra Malyon ◽  
Stephen Barclay
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Advance Care

BackgroundFrail and older people are estimated to account for 40% of deaths. Despite conversations about end-of-life care being an important component of the national End of Life Care Strategy, there is a marked disparity between the majority who would like to discuss advance care plans, and the minority who currently have this opportunity.AimTo investigate the attitudes of GPs to advance care planning (ACP) discussions with frail and older individuals.Design and settingFocus group study with GPs in Cambridgeshire between September 2015 and January 2016.MethodFive focus groups with 21 GPs were purposively sampled to maximise diversity. Framework analysis was used to analyse transcripts and develop themes.ResultsAlthough some GPs were concerned it might cause distress, the majority felt that raising ACP was important, especially as preparation for future emergencies. Knowing the individuals, introducing the idea as part of ongoing discussions, and public awareness campaigns were all facilitators identified. Several considered that service limitations made it difficult to fulfil patients’ wishes and risked raising unrealistic patient expectations. Other barriers identified included uncertainty over prognosis and difficulties ensuring that individuals’ wishes were respected.ConclusionMost GPs viewed ACP as important. However, their enthusiasm was tempered by experience. This study highlights the difficulties for GPs of encouraging dialogue and respecting individuals’ wishes within the constraints of the existing health and social care system. National publicity campaigns and encouraging patients to prioritise healthcare outcomes could help GPs raise care preferences without causing a detrimental impact on patients or raising unrealistic expectations. Once patients agree their care preferences, they need to be documented, accessible, and reviewed by all relevant health and social care providers to ensure that their wishes are respected, and plans amended as their circumstances change.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document