scholarly journals Relationship Quality and Patient-Assessed Quality of Care in VA Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of the Work Relationships Scale

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 543-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. P. Finley ◽  
J. A. Pugh ◽  
H. J. Lanham ◽  
L. K. Leykum ◽  
J. Cornell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Relationship Quality ◽  
Work Relationships ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Development And Validation

scholarly journals Quality of care in childhood tuberculosis diagnosis at primary care clinics in Kampala, Uganda

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1196-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kizito ◽  
A. Katamba ◽  
C. Marquez ◽  
P. Turimumahoro ◽  
I. Ayakaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Childhood Tuberculosis ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Tuberculosis Diagnosis

Quality of care in decentralized primary care clinics: A conceptual framework

1992 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Revital Gross ◽  
Jochanan Benbassat ◽  
Nurit Nirel ◽  
Miriam Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Primary Care Clinics

scholarly journals Assessing methods for measurement of clinical outcomes and quality of care in primary care practices

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E Green ◽  
William Hogg ◽  
Colleen Savage ◽  
Sharon Johnston ◽  
Grant Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

scholarly journals Effect of a primary care based epilepsy specialist nurse service on quality of care from the patients’ perspective: results at two-years follow-up

Seizure ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Mills ◽  
Max O. Bachmann ◽  
Rona Campbell ◽  
Iain Hine ◽  
Mervyn McGowan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Specialist Nurse ◽  
Patients Perspective

Evaluation of New York State's Child Health Plus: Children Who Have Asthma

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 105 (Supplement_E1) ◽  
pp. 719-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G. Szilagyi ◽  
Jane L. Holl ◽  
Lance E. Rodewald ◽  
Lorrie Yoos ◽  
Jack Zwanziger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
New York ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Acute Asthma ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Asthma Severity ◽  
Asthma Care ◽  
Uninsured Children

Background. Little is known about the impact of providing health insurance to uninsured children who have asthma or other chronic diseases. Objectives. To evaluate the association between health insurance and the utilization of health care and the quality of care among children who have asthma. Design. Before-and-during study of children for a 1-year period before and a 1-year period immediately after enrollment in a state-funded health insurance plan. Intervention. In 1991 New York State implemented Child Health Plus (CHPlus), a health insurance program providing ambulatory and ED (ED), but not hospitalization coverage for children 0 to 12.99 years old whose family incomes were below 222% of the federal poverty level and who were not enrolled in Medicaid. Subjects. A total of 187 children (2–12.99 years old) who had asthma and enrolled in CHPlus between November 1, 1991 and August 1, 1993. Main Outcome Measures. Rates of primary care visits (preventive, acute, asthma-specific), ED visits, hospitalizations, number of specialists seen, and quality of care measures (parent reports of the effect of CHPlus on quality of asthma care, and rates of recommended asthma therapies). The effect of CHPlus was assessed by comparing outcome measures for each child for the year before versus the year after CHPlus enrollment, controlling for age, insurance coverage before CHPlus, and asthma severity. Data Ascertainment. Parent telephone interviews and medical chart reviews at primary care offices, EDs, and public health clinics. Main Results. Visit rates to primary care providers were significantly higher during CHPlus compared with before CHPlus for chronic illness care (.995 visits before CHPlus vs 1.34 visits per year during CHPlus), follow-up visits (.86 visits vs 1.32 visits per year), total visits (5.69 visits vs 7.11 visits per year), and for acute asthma exacerbations (.61 visits vs 0.84 visits per year). There were no significant associations between CHPlus coverage and ED visits or hospitalizations, although specialty utilization increased (30% vs 40%; P = .02). According to parents, CHPlus reduced asthma severity for 55% of children (no change in severity for 44% and worsening severity for 1%). Similarly, CHPlus was reported to have improved overall health status for 45% of children (no change in 53% and worse in 1%), primarily attributable to coverage for office visits and asthma medications. CHPlus was associated with more asthma tune-up visits (48% before CHPlus vs 63% during CHPlus). There was no statistically significant effect of CHPlus on several other quality of care measures such as follow-up after acute exacerbations, receipt of influenza vaccination, or use of bronchodilators or antiinflammatory medications. Conclusions. Health insurance for uninsured children who have asthma helped overcome financial barriers that prevented children from receiving care for acute asthma exacerbations and for chronic asthma care. Health insurance was associated with increased utilization of primary care for asthma and improved parent perception of quality of care and asthma severity, but not with some quality indicators. Although more intensive interventions beyond health insurance are needed to optimize quality of asthma care, health insurance coverage substantially improves the health care for children who have asthma.

scholarly journals Creating a ‘reverse’ integrated primary and mental healthcare clinic for those with serious mental illness

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (05) ◽  
pp. 421-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandros Maragakis ◽  
Ragavan Siddharthan ◽  
Jill RachBeisel ◽  
Cassandra Snipes
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Policy Reforms ◽  
Mental Health Settings ◽  
Primary Care Practitioners

Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) are more likely to experience preventable medical health issues, such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and cardiovascular disease, than the general population. To further compound this issue, these individuals are less likely to seek preventative medical care. These factors result in higher usage of expensive emergency care, lower quality of care, and lower life expectancy. This manuscript presents literature that examines the health disparities this population experiences, and barriers to accessing primary care. Through the identification of these barriers, we recommend that the field of family medicine work in collaboration with the field of mental health to implement ‘reverse’ integrated care (RIC) systems, and provide primary care services in the mental health settings. By embedding primary care practitioners in mental health settings, where individuals with SMI are more likely to present for treatment, this population may receive treatment for somatic care by experts. This not only would improve the quality of care received by patients, but would also remove the burden of managing complex somatic care from providers trained in mental health. The rationale for this RIC system, as well as training and policy reforms, are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document