scholarly journals Quality of Care for Chronic Diseases in a British Cohort of Long-Term Cancer Survivors

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 418-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. F. Khan ◽  
D. Mant ◽  
P. W. Rose
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Chronic Diseases

scholarly journals Understanding contributors to quality of care in long-term care and changes under COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 960-960
Author(s):  
Sara Luck ◽  
Katie Aubrecht
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Qualitative Description ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Term Care ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Nursing home facilities are responsible for providing care for some of the most vulnerable groups in society, including the elderly and those with chronic medical conditions. In times of crisis, such as COVID-19 or other pandemics, the delivery of ‘regular’ care can be significantly impacted. In relation to COVID-19, there is an insufficient supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) to care for residents, as PPE not only protects care staff but also residents. Nursing homes across the United States and Canada have also taken protective measures to maximize the safety of residents by banning visitors, stopping all group activities, and increasing infection control measures. This presentation shares a research protocol and early findings from a study investigating the impact of COVID-19 on quality of care in residential long-term care (LTC) in the Canadian province of New Brunswick. This study used a qualitative description design to explore what contributes to quality of care for residents living in long-term care, and how this could change in times of crisis from the perspective of long-term care staff. Interviews were conducted with a broad range of staff at one LTC home. A semi-structured interview guide and approach to thematic analysis was framed by a social ecological perspective, making it possible to include the individual and proximal social influences as well as community, organizations, and policy influencers. Insights gained will improve the understanding of quality of care, as well as potential barriers and facilitators to care during times of crisis.

Quality of life in long-term childhood cancer survivors and the relation of late effects and subjective well-being

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigrid Pemberger ◽  
Reinhold Jagsch ◽  
Eva Frey ◽  
Rosemarie Felder-Puig ◽  
Helmut Gadner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Late Effects ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Childhood Cancer Survivors ◽  
Subjective Well Being

scholarly journals Quality of Care for Comorbid Conditions During the Transition to Survivorship: Differences Between Cancer Survivors and Noncancer Controls

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1140-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire F. Snyder ◽  
Kevin D. Frick ◽  
Robert J. Herbert ◽  
Amanda L. Blackford ◽  
Bridget A. Neville ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Comorbid Condition ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Building on previous research documenting differences in preventive care quality between cancer survivors and noncancer controls, this study examines comorbid condition care. Methods Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) –Medicare database, we examined comorbid condition quality of care in patients with locoregional breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer diagnosed in 2004 who were age ≥ 66 years at diagnosis, who had survived ≥ 3 years, and who were enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare. Controls were frequency matched to cases on age, sex, race, and region. Quality of care was assessed from day 366 through day 1,095 postdiagnosis using published indicators of chronic (n = 10) and acute (n = 19) condition care. The proportion of eligible cancer survivors and controls who received recommended care was compared by using Fisher's exact tests. The chronic and acute indicators, respectively, were then combined into single logistic regression models for each cancer type to compare survivors' care receipt to that of controls, adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic variables and controlling for within-patient variation. Results The sample matched 8,661 cancer survivors to 17,322 controls (mean age, 75 years; 65% male; 85% white). Colorectal cancer survivors were less likely than controls to receive appropriate care on both the chronic (odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.95) and acute (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.85) indicators. Prostate cancer survivors were more likely to receive appropriate chronic care (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.38) but less likely to receive quality acute care (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.87). Breast cancer survivors received care equivalent to controls on both the chronic (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.17) and acute (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.13) indicators. Conclusion Because we found differences by cancer type, research exploring factors associated with these differences in care quality is needed.

Quality of life and disparities among long-term cervical cancer survivors

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard P. Greenwald ◽  
Ruth McCorkle ◽  
Kathy Baumgartner ◽  
Carolyn Gotay ◽  
Anne Victoria Neale
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors

scholarly journals 144 QUALITY OF CARE IN PEDIATRIC CHRONIC DISEASES: A STUDY IN ITALY

1994 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 26A-26A
Author(s):  
Federico Marcheai ◽  
Maurizio Bonati ◽  
Gianni Tognoni ◽  
Giuseppe La Gamba ◽  
Giancarlo Biasini
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Chronic Diseases ◽  
Pediatric Chronic Diseases

“Kind, Sensitive, and Above All, Honest”: Long-Term Cancer Survivors’ Quality of Life and Self-Advocacy

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian G. E. Borofka ◽  
Justin P. Boren ◽  
Laura L. Ellingson
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Self Advocacy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document