scholarly journals Remote sensing of raindrop size distribution using Coherent Doppler Lidar

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
TIANWEN WEI ◽  
Haiyun Xia ◽  
BIN YUE ◽  
Yunbin Wu ◽  
Qi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Doppler Lidar ◽  
Coherent Doppler Lidar ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size

scholarly journals A Synergy Approach to Estimate Properties of Raindrop Size Distributions Using a Doppler Lidar and Cloud Radar

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1095-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Träumner ◽  
Jan Handwerker ◽  
Andreas Wieser ◽  
Jens Grenzhäuser
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Analytical Description ◽  
Doppler Lidar ◽  
Fall Velocity ◽  
Rayleigh Approximation ◽  
Size Dependent ◽  
Cloud Radar ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Remote Sensing Systems ◽  
Raindrop Size

Abstract Remote sensing systems like radars and lidars are frequently used in atmospheric measurement campaigns. Because of their different wavelengths, they operate in different scattering regimes. Combined use may result in new measurement options. Here, an approach to estimate raindrop size distribution using vertical velocities measured by a lidar–radar combination is introduced and tested using a 2-μm Doppler lidar and a 35.5-GHz cloud radar. The lidar spectra are evaluated to deduce air motion from the aerosol peak and the fall velocity of the raindrops from the rain peak. The latter is weighted by the area (D2) of the scatters. The fall velocity derived from radar measurements is weighted by D6 (Rayleigh approximation). Assuming a size-dependent fall velocity and an analytical description of the drop size distribution, its parameters are calculated from these data. Comparison of the raindrop size distribution from the lidar–radar combination with in situ measurements on the ground yields satisfying results.

scholarly journals Measurements of Rainfall Velocity and Raindrop Size Distribution Using Coherent Doppler Lidar

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1949-1966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Aoki ◽  
Hironori Iwai ◽  
Katsuhiro Nakagawa ◽  
Shoken Ishii ◽  
Kohei Mizutani
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Wind Velocity ◽  
Vertical Wind ◽  
Doppler Spectrum ◽  
Doppler Lidar ◽  
Stratiform Rain ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Rain Events ◽  
Vertical Wind Velocity

AbstractRainfall velocity, raindrop size distribution (DSD), and vertical wind velocity were simultaneously observed with 2.05- and 1.54-μm coherent Doppler lidars during convective and stratiform rain events. A retrieval method is based on identifying two separate spectra from the convolution of the aerosol and precipitation Doppler lidar spectra. The vertical wind velocity was retrieved from the aerosol spectrum peak and then the terminal rainfall velocity corrected by the vertical air motion from the precipitation spectrum peak was obtained. The DSD was derived from the precipitation spectrum using the relationship between the raindrop size and the terminal rainfall velocity. A comparison of the 1-min-averaged rainfall velocity from Doppler lidar measurements at a minimum range and that from a collocated ground-based optical disdrometer revealed high correlation coefficients of over 0.89 for both convective and stratiform rain events. The 1-min-averaged DSDs retrieved from the Doppler lidar spectrum using parametric and nonparametric methods are also in good agreement with those measured with the optical disdrometer with a correlation coefficient of over 0.80 for all rain events. To retrieve the DSD, the parametric method assumes a mathematical function for the DSD and the nonparametric method computes the direct deconvolution of the measured Doppler lidar spectrum without assuming a DSD function. It is confirmed that the Doppler lidar can retrieve the rainfall velocity and DSD during relatively heavy rain, whereas the ratio of valid data significantly decreases in light rain events because it is extremely difficult to separate the overlapping rain and aerosol peaks in the Doppler spectrum.

scholarly journals Improved rain rate and drop size retrievals from airborne Doppler radar

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (18) ◽  
pp. 11567-11589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon L. Mason ◽  
J. Christine Chiu ◽  
Robin J. Hogan ◽  
Lin Tian
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Satellite Remote Sensing ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Doppler Radar ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Airborne Doppler Radar

Abstract. Satellite remote sensing of rain is important for quantifying the hydrological cycle, atmospheric energy budget, and cloud and precipitation processes; however, radar retrievals of rain rate are sensitive to assumptions about the raindrop size distribution. The upcoming EarthCARE satellite will feature a 94 GHz Doppler radar alongside lidar and radiometer instruments, presenting opportunities for enhanced retrievals of the raindrop size distribution.

scholarly journals Analysis of the Vertical Air Motions and Raindrop Size Distribution Retrievals of a Squall Line Based on Cloud Radar Doppler Spectral Density Data

Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Ningkun Ma ◽  
Liping Liu ◽  
Yichen Chen ◽  
Yang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Density ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Squall Line ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Air Velocity ◽  
Density Data ◽  
Cloud Radar ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Reflectivity Factor

A squall line is a type of strongly organized mesoscale convective system that can cause severe weather disasters. Thus, it is crucial to explore the dynamic structure and hydrometeor distributions in squall lines. This study analyzed a squall line over Guangdong Province on 6 May 2016 that was observed using a Ka-band millimeter-wave cloud radar (CR) and an S-band dual-polarization radar (PR). Doppler spectral density data obtained by the CR were used to retrieve the vertical air motions and raindrop size distribution (DSD). The results showed the following: First, the CR detected detailed vertical profiles and their evolution before and during the squall line passage. In the convection time segment (segment B), heavy rain existed with a reflectivity factor exceeding 35 dBZ and a velocity spectrum width exceeding 1.3 m s−1. In the PR detection, the differential reflectivity factor (Zdr) was 1–2 dB, and the large specific differential phase (Kdp) also represented large liquid water content. In the transition and stratiform cloud time segments (segments B and C), the rain stabilized gradually, with decreasing cloud tops, stable precipitation, and a 0 °C layer bright band. Smaller Kdp values (less than 0.9) were distributed around the 0 °C layer, which may have been caused by the melting of ice crystal particles. Second, from the CR-retrieved vertical air velocity, before squall line passage, downdrafts dominated in local convection and weak updrafts existed in higher-altitude altostratus clouds. In segment B, the updraft air velocity reached more than 8 m s−1 below the 0 °C layer. From segments C to D, the updrafts changed gradually into weak and wide-ranging downdrafts. Third, in the comparison of DSD values retrieved at 1.5 km and DSD values on the ground, the retrieved DSD line was lower than the disdrometer, the overall magnitude of the DSD retrieved was smaller, and the difference decreased from segments C to D. The standardized intercept parameter (Nw) and shape parameter (μ) of the DSD retrieved at 1.8 km showed good agreement with the disdrometer results, and the mass-weighted mean diameter (Dm) was smaller than that on the ground, but very close to the PR-retrieved Dm result at 2 km. Therefore, comparing with the DSD retrieved at around 2 km, the overall number concentration remained unchanged and Dm got larger on the ground, possibly reflecting the process of raindrop coalescence. Lastly, the average vertical profiles of several quantities in all segments showed that, first of all, the decrease of Nw and Dm with height in segments C and D was similar, reflecting the collision effect of falling raindrops. The trends were opposite in segment B, indicating that raindrops underwent intense mixing and rapid collision and growth in this segment. Then, PR-retrieved Dm profiles can verify the rationality of the CR-retrieved Dm. Finally, a vertical velocity profile peak generated a larger Dm especially in segments C and D.

scholarly journals On the Shape–Slope Relation of Drop Size Distributions in Convective Rain

2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1146-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Seifert
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Gamma Distribution ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Empirical Relation ◽  
Size Distributions ◽  
Shape Parameters ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Drop Size Distributions ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract The relation between the slope and shape parameters of the raindrop size distribution parameterized by a gamma distribution is examined. The comparison of results of a simple rain shaft model with an empirical relation based on disdrometer measurements at the surface shows very good agreement, but a more detailed discussion reveals some difficulties—for example, deviations from the gamma shape and the overestimation of collisional breakup.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution Assumption through Comparison of Rain Rates of Measured and Radar-Equivalent Gamma DSD

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1618-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Adirosi ◽  
Eugenio Gorgucci ◽  
Luca Baldini ◽  
Ali Tokay
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Drop Size Distribution ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Rain Rates

AbstractTo date, one of the most widely used parametric forms for modeling raindrop size distribution (DSD) is the three-parameter gamma. The aim of this paper is to analyze the error of assuming such parametric form to model the natural DSDs. To achieve this goal, a methodology is set up to compare the rain rate obtained from a disdrometer-measured drop size distribution with the rain rate of a gamma drop size distribution that produces the same triplets of dual-polarization radar measurements, namely reflectivity factor, differential reflectivity, and specific differential phase shift. In such a way, any differences between the values of the two rain rates will provide information about how well the gamma distribution fits the measured precipitation. The difference between rain rates is analyzed in terms of normalized standard error and normalized bias using different radar frequencies, drop shape–size relations, and disdrometer integration time. The study is performed using four datasets of DSDs collected by two-dimensional video disdrometers deployed in Huntsville (Alabama) and in three different prelaunch campaigns of the NASA–Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) ground validation program including the Hydrological Cycle in Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX) special observation period (SOP) 1 field campaign in Rome. The results show that differences in rain rates of the disdrometer DSD and the gamma DSD determining the same dual-polarization radar measurements exist and exceed those related to the methodology itself and to the disdrometer sampling error, supporting the finding that there is an error associated with the gamma DSD assumption.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document