Modulation of Conscientiousness on Medial Frontal Negativity in Negative Emotions: an ERP Study on Ultimatum Game

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 320-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu WANG ◽  
ChongDe LIN ◽  
XueYing CHEN ◽  
DeLi SHEN ◽  
YiWen WANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ultimatum Game ◽  
Negative Emotions ◽  
Medial Frontal Negativity ◽  
Frontal Negativity

Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Gaudencio Rêgo ◽  
Camila Campanhã ◽  
Julia Horta Tabosa do Egito ◽  
Paulo Sérgio Boggio
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Ultimatum Game ◽  
Medial Frontal Negativity ◽  
Frontal Negativity

Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study

2016 ◽  
Vol 1639 ◽  
pp. 38-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangrong Wang ◽  
Jianbiao Li ◽  
Zheng Li ◽  
Mengxing Wei ◽  
Shaodong Li
Keyword(s):  
Ultimatum Game ◽  
Inequality Aversion ◽  
Medial Frontal Negativity ◽  
Frontal Negativity

scholarly journals I’ll make you an offer you can refuse: How socially sensitive is the MFN?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiel Spape ◽  
Kimberley Dundas
Keyword(s):  
Ultimatum Game ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Anterior Cingulate ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Norm Violation ◽  
Emotional Processes ◽  
Medial Frontal Negativity ◽  
Frontal Negativity ◽  
Probabilistic Process ◽  
Almost All

Medial frontal negativity (MFN) is an event-related potential thought to originate in the anterior cingulate cortex. It is evoked by outcomes being worse than expected, such as when presented with unfair economic proposals during the Ultimatum Game (UG). This could mean the MFN indexes a social-emotional response, as commonly suggested in accounts that relate it to a violation of a social norm of fairness. To examine the link between MFN and norm violation, we designed an EEG experiment with participants acting as representatives in an UG. Participants responded either as themselves, or as representatives of two charities. Of these, a norm-compatible charity conformed to the participant’s values, while the norm-incompatible charity contrasted to them. The behavioural results showed that norm-incompatible representation reversed behaviour, with almost all fair offers being declined. The MFN, however, was unaffected by the norm representation, with unfair offers consistently evoking MFNs across conditions. We furthermore replicated the curious finding that unexpectedly generous offers evoke as much MFN as unfair offers. Thus, the MFN is not nearly as sensitive to higher-order social-emotional processes as commonly assumed. Instead, the perceived inequality that drives the MFN is likely due to a rational, probabilistic process.

scholarly journals Social Value Orientation Modulates Fairness Processing During Social Decision-Making: Evidence From Behavior and Brain Potentials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinmu Hu ◽  
Xiaoqin Mai
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ultimatum Game ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Emotional Reactions ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Social Decision ◽  
Frontal Negativity ◽  
Social Decision Making

Abstract Social value orientation (SVO) characterizes stable individual differences by an inherent sense of fairness in outcome allocations. Using the event-related potential (ERP), this study investigated differences in fairness decision-making behavior and neural bases between individuals with prosocial and proself orientations using the Ultimatum Game (UG). Behavioral results indicated that prosocials were more prone to rejecting unfair offers with stronger negative emotional reactions compared with proselfs. ERP results revealed that prosocials showed a larger P2 when receiving fair offers than unfair ones in a very early processing stage, whereas such effect was absent in proselfs. In later processing stages, although both groups were sensitive to fairness as reflected by an enhanced medial frontal negativity (MFN) for unfair offers and a larger P3 for fair offers, prosocials exhibited a stronger fairness effect on these ERP components relative to proselfs. Furthermore, the fairness effect on the MFN mediated the SVO effect on rejecting unfair offers. Findings regarding emotional experiences, behavioral patterns, and ERPs provide compelling evidence that SVO modulates fairness processing in social decision-making, whereas differences in neural responses to unfair vs. fair offers as evidenced by the MFN appear to play important roles in the SVO effect on behavioral responses to unfairness.

Medial Frontal Negativity (MFN)

2013 ◽  
pp. 1818-1818
Author(s):  
Tiffany Hutchins ◽  
Giacomo Vivanti ◽  
Natasa Mateljevic ◽  
Roger J. Jou ◽  
Frederick Shic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Frontal Negativity ◽  
Frontal Negativity

Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: Beyond errors and response conflict

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce D. Bartholow ◽  
Melanie A. Pearson ◽  
Cheryl L. Dickter ◽  
Kenneth J. Sher ◽  
Monica Fabiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Conflict ◽  
Strategic Control ◽  
Medial Frontal Negativity ◽  
Frontal Negativity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document