Emerging Capitalism in Central Europe and Southeast Asia: A Comparison of Political Economies

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-117
Author(s):  
Franois Bafoil ◽  
Michael OMahony ◽  
John Angell ◽  
Edo Andriesse ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-422
Author(s):  
O. Fiona Yap ◽  
Hoang Long Chu

When do militaries in the newly industrialized countries of East and Southeast Asia support their governments, when do they support citizens' challenge of government, and when do they launch coups? We propose and test a theory of military behavior using data from across East and Southeast Asia between the 1970s and 2008. The results corroborate the model's predictions to make four contributions: First, the model provides a framework of military behavior for countries to expand study beyond coups or the absence thereof. Second, the findings bring to focus the influence of citizens on the military's behavior, an aspect largely overlooked in scholarship of the region. Third, the necessary conditions—weak economy and galvanized citizens' challenge—that affect the military's behavior vis-à -vis citizens and the government highlight the strategic interaction treatment. Fourth, this study broadens systematic treatment to enrich empirics and theory-building for the political economies of these countries.


2003 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 547-549
Author(s):  
Zhou Xun

Xenophobic nationalism and ethnic conflict have been major features of modern times. As Daniel Chirot rightly points out about Jews in Europe and Chinese in South-East Asia in his introduction, “information about these two successful but often persecuted minorities offers insights about the very formation of ethnic and nationalist identities, and clues about when such a process is more or less likely to lead to either violent social separation and conflict or peaceful accommodation” (p. 3).


Indonesia ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 183
Author(s):  
Mary Somers Heidhues ◽  
Daniel Chirot ◽  
Anthony Reid ◽  
Twang Peck Yang

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-385
Author(s):  
Simeon J. Newman ◽  
Laura J. Enríquez

Abstract Research on East-Central Europe suggests that the transitions from state socialism to capitalism generated civil society. The present authors focus on the effects of a transition of the opposite variety: from capitalism towards state socialism. Both kinds of transitions are characterized by a disjuncture between enduring political economies and legitimate discourses calling for them to be changed. Marshaling qualitative and quantitative data, the authors demonstrate the existence, and assess the effects, of such a disjuncture in the case of Venezuela between circa 2000 and 2010. They examine a subset of rural civic organizations, showing that they referenced mutually-incompatible aspects of the disjointed state when developing their programs, leading them to within-class heterogeneity and occasional across-classes convergence, as is characteristic of pluralist civil society.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document