Kafamda Bir Tuhaflık by Orhan Pamuk

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 116-116
Author(s):  
Iclal Cetin
Keyword(s):  
Orhan Pamuk

Book Reviews

Journeys ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-153
Keyword(s):  
Ottoman Empire ◽  
Central Europe ◽  
Travel Writing ◽  
North Africa ◽  
Global Politics ◽  
Cultural Exchanges ◽  
Orhan Pamuk

Orhan Pamuk, Istanbul: Memories of a City Fiona SmythGerald MacLean (ed.), Re-Orienting the Renaissance. Cultural Exchanges with the East Clifford Edmund Bosworth, An Intrepid Scot. William Lithgow of Lanark’s Travels in the Ottoman Lands, North Africa and Central Europe, 1609–21 Alex Drace-FrancisDaniel Carey (ed.), Asian Travel in the Renaissance John E. Wills, Jr.Gerald M. MacLean, The Rise of Oriental Travel: English Visitors to the Ottoman Empire, 1580–1720 Felipe Fernández-ArmestoDebbie Lisle, The Global Politics of Contemporary Travel Writing Benjamin J. MullerBassam Tayara, Le Japon et les Arabes. La vision du Monde Arabe au Japon, des époques anciennes jusqu’au tournant de Meiji Elisabeth AllèsAlain Roussillon, Identité et Modernité – Les voyageurs égyptiens au Japon Bassam TayaraBenoit de L’Estoile, Federico Neiburg, and Lygia Sigaud (eds.), Empires, Nations, and Natives: Anthropology and State-Making Talal Asad

Podróżnik i muzeum

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justyna Chmielewska
Keyword(s):  
Orhan Pamuk

Hüseyin Bahri Alptekin i Orhan Pamuk, artysta wizualny pokazujący swoje prace w najważniejszych centrach sztuki i pisarz, laureat Nagrody Nobla; łączy ich zainteresowanie przedmiotami jako nośnikami znaczeń i pasja gromadzenia z pozoru nieznaczących drobiazgów, dzieli sposób myślenia o kolekcji. Pierwszy jest wędrowcem, odczytującym z mijanej po drodze rzeczywistości nieoczywiste sensy i na nowo wiążącym ze sobą miejsca, rzeczy i znaki. Drugi jest nostalgikiem, rozkładającym na części wspomnienia zakodowane w przedmiotach – im poświęcił zaaranżowane w Stambule i wzorowane na tekście własnej powieści Muzeum Niewinności. Artykuł jest próbą równoległej lektury dzieł obu tureckich twórców – podróżnika i muzealnika, bacznego obserwatora pozornie błahej codzienności i introwertycznego badacza pamięci.

scholarly journals Roteiro de busca

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (29) ◽  
pp. 17-44
Author(s):  
Otávio Velho
Keyword(s):  
Karl Mannheim ◽  
Orhan Pamuk

Este artigo examina dilemas postos pela emergência de uma nova Direita para o mundo de hoje e as ciências sociais. Para isto retoma a obra de Karl Mannheim, especialmente a sua insistência em levar em conta todos os pontos-de-vista e o papel de uma intelligentsia. Considerações do filósofo Espinosa são trazidas para complementar essa linha de raciocínio, bem como subsídios retirados do trabalho do antropólogo Tim Ingold e do romancista Orhan Pamuk.

scholarly journals Shaymaa Neamah Mohammed ALMKHELIF

2022 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 192-200
Author(s):  
Sevsen Aziz HILAYIF
Keyword(s):  
Short Story ◽  
Historical Novel ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Detailed Explanation ◽  
Short Summary ◽  
The People ◽  
Turkish Literature ◽  
Turkish People ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Orhan Pamuk

Orhan Pamuk is considered one of the most important novelists and short story writers in Turkish Literature. The full name is Ferit Orhan Pamuk. He was born in Istanbul in 1952. He is now 69 year old and still alive. He is considered the first Turkish writer who wins Noble Prize for literature for the year 2006. He won several other prizes, one of which is Noble Prize because he has several short stories and novels. The White Castle is one of the most important novels for the author Orhan Pamuk who won the Noble Prize. It is considered a historical novel that belongs to the Ottoman Empire era in the 17th century. The novel revolves on one of the passengers who travels to Napoli through the sea. The Ottoman pirates captivate him and sell him to one of the Turkish people as slave. Both the master and the slave almost share the same features although they are from different geographic areas. The novel deals with the similarities and differences among the people of the and the people of the west in an accurate way. The concept of dream is to wish something favorable in the future. There were several types and ways of daydreams. This concept is different from one person to another. This term cannot be clearly defined because of its subjective nature. It appears in a very wide area, from the ability to maintain the thing dreamt to achieve to the world of dreams of the dreamer. Hence, the reality of daydreams is a wonderful art that is different from one person to another. We start the research by giving inclusive summary. In the Introduction, there is short summary for the life and literary personality of the Turkish author Orhan Pamuk as well as his works. The research introduces information about the novel which is the subject of the research paper. It introduces, through detailed study for the novel The White Castle, a detailed explanation about the art of dreams.

scholarly journals The process of Islamization of modern Turkish society in modern Turkish literature (on the example of Orhan Pamuk’s works)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 567-575
Author(s):  
Apollinaria S. Avrutina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
Nobel Laureate ◽  
Social Changes ◽  
Turkish Literature ◽  
European Values ◽  
Diachronic Analysis ◽  
Orhan Pamuk ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Turkish Society

The article is an analysis of the work of the Turkish Nobel Laureate in Literature for 2006, Orhan Pamuk, in the context of the development of modern Turkish society. In recent decades, a process of moderate Islamization has been observed in Turkey, and if until the end of the 1990s the country aspired to Europe, the European community, and officially turned mainly to European values, now there is a reverse movement. European values to a certain extent dominated Turkish literature of the 20th century: various types of freedoms, equality and women’s rights, the secularization of society — the main themes of the leading Turkish novels of the 20th century. It is surprising that the current processes are rather poorly reflected in modern literature. Orhan Pamuk, one of the youngest Nobel laureates and the most famous Turkish writer of the 20th–21st centuries, is a liberal and supporter of Eurocentrism. At the beginning of his career, he played the role of the continuer of the work of a whole galaxy of Turkish authors, whose gaze, despite the difference in political convictions, was focused only on the West and its culture. However, now the diachronic analysis of all his novels shows a reflection of the current serious social changes. In recent novels, Orhan Pamuk, following Turkish society, demonstrates the inclination of his protagonists towards traditional Muslim values. It is obvious that what is happening is a general phenomenon, an example of a deep tendency in the Middle East Muslim culture in general.

Author in the Classroom: An Interview with Orhan Pamuk

2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-15
Author(s):  
Pınar Batur
Keyword(s):  
Young Woman ◽  
Nobel Prize ◽  
Private Life ◽  
The Public ◽  
Turkish Literature ◽  
The World ◽  
The Media ◽  
Orhan Pamuk ◽  
As If

While I was editing this interview with Orhan Pamuk in the Spring 2007, the media exploded with him: “Pamuk Wins the Nobel Prize!” It was not surprising, because for sometime now Orhan Pamuk has been known the world over as the “super hero” of Turkish literature. In Turkey, once again, the media turned its gaze away from Iraq, EU, unemployment, and questions of accountability in government, to contemplate why, how and what Pamuk had won, and the question of who is Orhan Pamuk? As the intensity of the debate increased, I began to wonder if Orhan Pamuk himself would be following it as if it was about somebody else. It certainly did not sound like the dissonance could be about one person, as the public contemplated him, unfolding multiple layers of his political convictions, his nationalism, his character, family, marriage, and private life. As the attention to his work disappeared, he was processed and reproduced by the media, with an effort that surpassed the media frenzy regarding his trial for his statements on genocide. Pamuk the author was replaced by Pamuk the image on the pages of tabloids. A year ago, when I asked if she had read Orhan Pamuk, a young woman in Istanbul had inquired, “Is he somebody?” Oh! Yes!, he is somebody, actually he has become more than that.

The Multiple Simultaneous Temporalities of Global Modernity: Pamuk, Tanpınar, Proust

2021 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-498
Author(s):  
Shaj Mathew
Keyword(s):  
Marcel Proust ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Modernist Literature ◽  
Global Modernity ◽  
Orhan Pamuk ◽  
Developed Nations ◽  
East West ◽  
Empty Time

Abstract This essay proposes the theory of multiple simultaneous temporalities as a constitutive feature of global modernism. It spotlights varieties of heterogeneous time—outside but alongside the homogeneous empty time of clocks and calendars—in modernist literature. These overlapping temporalities replace the linear succession of past, present, and future with a principle of nonteleology. The multiple simultaneous temporalities of these works analogize the multiple simultaneous temporalities of global modernity. Thus the temporalization of difference that separates developed nations from developing ones is refuted by the pluralization of temporality. The simultaneity of these temporalities denies, a priori, the ideology of progress. The essay makes this point through a series of interlaced epiphanies about time, across time, staging an East-West comparison that reflects the creole nature of global modernity. It does so via readings of interconnected novels by Orhan Pamuk, Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, and Marcel Proust.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document