Race Differences in Cohort Effects on Non-Marital Fertilityin the United States: Reply to Martin

Social Forces ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 1489-1497
Author(s):  
J. Stockard ◽  
J. A. Gray ◽  
R. O'Brien ◽  
J. Stone
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Race Differences ◽  
Cohort Effects

scholarly journals Race Differences in Cohort Effects on Non-Marital Fertility in the United States

Social Forces ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 1449-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Stockard ◽  
J. A. Gray ◽  
R. O'Brien ◽  
J. Stone
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Marital Fertility ◽  
The United States ◽  
Race Differences ◽  
Cohort Effects

Abstract P204: Birth Cohort Effects and Lipid Trends—The Impact of the Obesity Epidemic: Evidence From Cohorts Born Between 1930 and 1998 in the United States

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanh-Huyen T Vu ◽  
Donald Lloyd-Jones ◽  
Mercedes R Carnethon ◽  
John T Wilkins ◽  
Hy Tran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Birth Cohort ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cohort Effects ◽  
Obesity Epidemic ◽  
The Impact

AGE, PERIOD, AND COHORT EFFECTS ON DEATH PENALTY ATTITUDES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1974-2014

Criminology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 833-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
AMY L. ANDERSON ◽  
ROBERT LYTLE ◽  
PHILIP SCHWADEL
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cohort Effects

Cohort Effects in Promotions and Wages: Evidence from Sweden and the United States

2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 772-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Illoong Kwon ◽  
Eva Meyersson Milgrom ◽  
Seiwoon Hwang
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cohort Effects

scholarly journals Trends in Dementia Prevalence in the United States, 1995-2019: An Age-Period-Cohort-Interaction Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 76-76
Author(s):  
Mark Lee ◽  
Liying Luo
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cohort Effects ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Dementia Prevalence ◽  
Dementia Risk ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Main Effects ◽  
Retirement Study

Abstract Previous studies have indicated that age-specific dementia prevalence has declined in the United States and other high-income countries. However, these studies have been limited by estimating temporal change in dementia rates on a strictly period basis, with little attention to possible cohort effects. Distinguishing age, period, and cohort effects is both methodologically and theoretically important for identifying the etiological factors driving dementia decline in the population. In this study, we apply the novel Age-Period-Cohort-Interaction (APC-I) model, which defines cohort effects as the interaction between age and period main effects. The APC-I model improves on earlier APC models (e.g., the accounting method) by solving the linear dependence between predictors through theoretical clarification instead of statistical manipulation. We use the APC-I model to estimate period and cohort trends in dementia prevalence using data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Our analysis points to significant period and cohort effects. Dementia prevalence declined significantly between the periods 1995-1999 and 2015-2019. At the same time, cohorts born in the 1940s had significantly lower odds of dementia than would be expected given age and period main effects. This cohort’s unique protection from dementia has been relatively stable as they have aged. Our study identifies the periods during which and cohorts for whom dementia risk has declined in the United States. Further research is needed to specify the period factors (e.g., broad based improvements in nutrition) and cohort factors (e.g., increases in educational attainment) that are responsible for these trends.

scholarly journals Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Psychological Distress in the United States and Canada

2014 ◽  
Vol 179 (10) ◽  
pp. 1216-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Keyes ◽  
Ryan Nicholson ◽  
Jolene Kinley ◽  
Sarah Raposo ◽  
Murray B. Stein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cohort Effects
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document