Charles Waddell Chesnutt and Joel Chandler Harris: An Anxiety of Influence

1999 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tynes Cowan
Author(s):  
Amanda Brickell Bellows

In the early twentieth century, an increasingly diverse group of Russians and Americans reflected upon their changing worlds in literature and visual culture. They produced competing representations of serfs, enslaved African Americans, peasants, and freedpeople that alternately idealized and criticized the pre and post-emancipation eras. This chapter studies the work of Joel Chandler Harris, Thomas Nelson Page, Kate Chopin, Charles Waddell Chesnutt, Thomas Dixon, Jr., W.E.B. Du Bois, Anton Chekhov, and Evgenii Opochinin.


1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lloyd Whitesell
Keyword(s):  

Utilitas ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Weinstein

This paper examines the undervalued role of Herbert Spencer in Sidgwick's thinking. Sidgwick recognized Spencer's utilitarianism, but criticized him on the ground that he tried to deduce utilitarianism from evolutionary theory. In analysing these criticisms, this paper concludes that Spencer's deductive methodology was in fact closer to Sidgwick's empiricist position than Sidgwick realized. The real source of Sidgwick's unhappiness withSpencer lies with the substance of Spencer's utilitarianism, namely its espousal of indefeasible moral rights.


1987 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
W. H. Herendeen ◽  
Margaret W. Ferguson ◽  
David Quint

AJS Review ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-303
Author(s):  
Eran Viezel

Rashbam's approach to Rashi's commentary on the Torah is characterized by contrasts: originality and continuity, independence and dependence, open admiration and flagrant aggression. Scholars have clarified various aspects of this complex stance, yet their analyses do not provide a comprehensive explanation for it. This article argues that Rashbam's approach to Rashi's commentary is not based on methodological principles alone, but also includes an emotional element that is in part unconscious. To analyze these complex emotional elements of the text, the article uses a theoretical model that demonstrates that the ambivalence reflected in the text is not unusual, and in fact can be found in relationships between other writers— “the anxiety of influence,” as formulated by Harold Bloom. This conclusion sheds new light on Rashbam's commentary, including several of its more well-known passages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document