Another Ground Rule

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-60
Author(s):  
Charles S. Reichardt
Keyword(s):  
Ground Rule

scholarly journals Impact of Quality Risk Management Process in Pharmaceutical Industry to Curtail the Non Conformity

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 74-82
Author(s):  
Aachchhadita Sharma ◽  
Raju Mari Jeyaprakash ◽  
Raju Mari Jeyaprakash ◽  
Rinchi Bora ◽  
Abinash Chandra
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Risk Mitigation ◽  
Drug Product ◽  
Management Process ◽  
Ground Rule ◽  
Quality Risk Management ◽  
Risk Management Process ◽  
Regulatory Bodies ◽  
Quality Risk ◽  
Risk Scale

Risk is intertwined with every drug product in a market. This article’s intent is to provide ground rule and praxis of different tools for Quality Risk Management (QRM) in various aspects of pharmaceutical science. QRM comprises of tools and processes which helps in establishing objectives. Hence they are also known as Enablers. Enablers help in risk mitigation of product quality throughout a lifecycle in such a way that benefit outweighs the risk. The key properties of Enablers or QRM, i.e., attempts made, solemnness and records shall be compatible with risk scale. The Enablers accomplishment gives recognized, obvious and steps of Enabler process produced by regeneratable methods which is based on customary comprehension to evaluate feasibility, ability to find out risk prejudice. The QRM or Enabler tools can assist the manufacturing company and regulatory bodies to scrutinize, handle, notify, and inspect the risk.

scholarly journals Formatting the surgical management of Tessier cleft types 3 and 4

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S174-S183
Author(s):  
R. K. Mishra ◽  
Reetesh Purwar
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Ground Rule ◽  
Contemporary Approach ◽  
Three Components

ABSTRACTTessier cleft types 3 and 4 are rare entities even among what are considered other rare craniofacial clefts. Very few cases have been reported worldwide, especially in the bilateral form. In the absence of any well-laid guidelines for management of such rare cases, plastic surgeons operate on such cases due to the inherent complexities in technique. To overcome this problem and provide a ground rule for surgical management of such cases, we propose an easier format with a ‘split approach’ of the affected areas. In our proposed formatting, we have divided the affected areas of the cleft into three components: 1. Lid component; 2. Lip component; and 3. Nasomalar component. Any person skilled in the plastic surgical art would appreciate that individual management of the aforesaid demarcated areas is easy as compared to the surgery of the entire craniofacial cleft, that too with the contemporary approach. We have evaluated this formatting technique with a ‘split approach’ in seven cases and found the results more convincing compared to those of classical methods. We invite the surgical fraternity to validate the surgical formatting in their settings and provide us with feedback on the same to consolidate these results.

Evaluation of Overlay Accuracy for 100-nm Ground Rule in Proximity X-Ray Lithography

2000 ◽  
Vol 39 (Part 1, No. 9A) ◽  
pp. 5334-5339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajime Aoyama ◽  
Makoto Fukuda ◽  
Souichirou Mitsui ◽  
Takao Taguchi ◽  
Masanori Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Rule ◽  
X Ray

Design and Optimization of Gate Sidewall Spacers to Achieve 45 nm Ground Rule for High-Performance Applications

2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 04C053
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Miyashita ◽  
Katsuaki Ookoshi ◽  
Akiyoshi Hatada ◽  
Keiji Ikeda ◽  
Young Suk Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Performance ◽  
Ground Rule ◽  
Design And Optimization

Design and Optimization of Gate Sidewall Spacers to Achieve 45nm Ground Rule for High-performance Applications

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Miyashita ◽  
K. Ookoshi ◽  
A. Hatada ◽  
K. Ikeda ◽  
Y. S. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Performance ◽  
Ground Rule ◽  
Design And Optimization

The utility of ground rule instructions with younger and older adult witnesses

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 664-677
Author(s):  
Mohammed M. Ali ◽  
Sonja P. Brubacher ◽  
Becky Earhart ◽  
Martine B. Powell ◽  
Nina J. Westera
Keyword(s):  
Older Adult ◽  
Ground Rule

Intervention and non-intervention in international society: Britain's responses to the American and Spanish Civil Wars

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 1111-1129
Author(s):  
RICHARD LITTLE
Keyword(s):  
Civil War ◽  
Civil Wars ◽  
Spanish Civil War ◽  
International Order ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Napoleonic Wars ◽  
Ground Rule ◽  
Anglo American ◽  
The Right ◽  
Right Of Self Determination

AbstractThis article aims to show that from the end of the eighteenth century, international order began to be defined in terms of ground rules relating to non-intervention and intervention, with the former being prioritised over the latter. After the Napoleonic wars, within continental Europe there was an attempt to consolidate an intervention ground rule in favour of dynastic legitimacy over the right of self-determination. By contrast, the British and Americans sought to ensure that this ground rule was not extended to the Americas where the ground rule of non-intervention was prioritised. During the nineteenth century, it was the Anglo-American position which came to prevail. Over the same period international order was increasingly bifurcated with the non-intervention ground rule prevailing in the metropolitan core and with the intervention ground rules prevailing in the periphery. This article, however, only focuses on the metropolitan core and draws on two case studies to examine the non-intervention ground rule in very different circumstances. The first examines the British response to the American Civil War in the 1860s during an era of stability in the international order. The second explores the British Response to the Spanish Civil War in the 1930s when the international order was very unstable and giving way to a very different international order.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document