Francis Stuart: Face to Face: A Critical Study (review)

2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-153
Author(s):  
Brad Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Critical Study ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Study Review

Arthur Miller: A Critical Study (review)

2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 534-535
Author(s):  
Richard K. Tharp
Keyword(s):  
Critical Study ◽  
Arthur Miller ◽  
Study Review

Arthur Miller: A Critical Study (review)

Modern Drama ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-611
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. (Jeffrey Daniel) Mason
Keyword(s):  
Critical Study ◽  
Arthur Miller ◽  
Study Review

Face-to-Face

1992 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Jerger
Keyword(s):  
Face To Face

Supporting the Use of Rudimentary Vocalizations

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Zubow ◽  
Richard Hurtig
Keyword(s):  
Rett Syndrome ◽  
Visual Cues ◽  
Acoustic Analysis ◽  
Eye Gaze ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Primary Research ◽  
Multiple Modalities ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Perceptual Judgments ◽  
The Face

Children with Rett Syndrome (RS) are reported to use multiple modalities to communicate although their intentionality is often questioned (Bartolotta, Zipp, Simpkins, & Glazewski, 2011; Hetzroni & Rubin, 2006; Sigafoos et al., 2000; Sigafoos, Woodyatt, Tuckeer, Roberts-Pennell, & Pittendreigh, 2000). This paper will present results of a study analyzing the unconventional vocalizations of a child with RS. The primary research question addresses the ability of familiar and unfamiliar listeners to interpret unconventional vocalizations as “yes” or “no” responses. This paper will also address the acoustic analysis and perceptual judgments of these vocalizations. Pre-recorded isolated vocalizations of “yes” and “no” were presented to 5 listeners (mother, father, 1 unfamiliar, and 2 familiar clinicians) and the listeners were asked to rate the vocalizations as either “yes” or “no.” The ratings were compared to the original identification made by the child's mother during the face-to-face interaction from which the samples were drawn. Findings of this study suggest, in this case, the child's vocalizations were intentional and could be interpreted by familiar and unfamiliar listeners as either “yes” or “no” without contextual or visual cues. The results suggest that communication partners should be trained to attend to eye-gaze and vocalizations to ensure the child's intended choice is accurately understood.

An Introduction to the Critical Study and Knowledge of the Holy Scriptures

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Hartwell Horne ◽  
Samuel Davidson ◽  
Samuel Prideaux Tregelles
Keyword(s):  
Critical Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document