Listen to the Wind by James Reaney, and: Colours in the Dark by James Reaney, and: The Ecstasy of Rita Joe by George Ryga, and: Captives of the Faceless Drummer by George Ryga, and: Rinse Cycle by Jackie Crossland & Rudy LaValle, and: Crabdance by Beverly Simons, and: Ashes for Easter and Other Monodramas by David Watmough (review)

Modern Drama ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-124
Author(s):  
Michael Mason
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
pp. 002198942097099
Author(s):  
Kit Dobson

This article considers ways in which solidarity across social locations might play a role in fostering resistance to vulnerability. My case study consists of the interplay between writer George Ryga’s 1967 play The Ecstasy of Rita Joe, and Okanagan Syilx writer and scholar Jeannette Armstrong’s 1985 novel Slash. While these important and compelling texts have received considerable critical attention, the relationship between them is less known. I am interested in the ways in which these works both hail and offer critique to one another. In the contemporary moment, in which questions of appropriation of voice have gained renewed urgency within Indigenous literary circles in Canada and beyond, the relationship between these texts speaks to a historical instance of appropriation, but also of complicated processes of alliance-building. These texts demonstrate how agency resides across multiple locations. I read Ryga’s Ecstasy in the context of Jeannette Armstrong’s engagement with the play within her novel Slash in order to witness the ways in which Ryga’s text, in the first instance, appropriates Indigenous voices into an anti-capitalist critique. In the second instance, I read these works in order to witness how they might simultaneously provide a compelling analysis of the vulnerability of the people who are the subject of both works. I compare the interplay between Armstrong and Ryga’s texts to contemporary debates around appropriation in order to argue for the historical and ongoing importance of these two works as precursors to the crucial interventions made by contemporary Indigenous critics and writers.


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 759-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takako Igarashi ◽  
Koichi Nakamura ◽  
Masato Hoshi ◽  
Teruyuki Hara ◽  
Hironori Kojima ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 582-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kira L. Newman ◽  
Faith E. Bartz ◽  
Lynette Johnston ◽  
Christine L. Moe ◽  
Lee-Ann Jaykus ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Several produce-associated outbreaks have been linked to the packing facility. Equipment surfaces may be an important source of contamination. The goal was to assess whether the microbial load of packing facility surfaces is associated with the microbial load of produce. From November 2000 to December 2003, 487 matched produce (14 types) and equipment surfaces (six production steps) were sampled from eight packing facilities in the United States near the border with Mexico and enumerated for aerobic plate counts (APC), Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, and coliforms. Bivariate correlations were assessed by Spearman's ρ, and adjusted associations were assessed by multilevel mixed linear regression models. In general, the microbial load both increased and decreased on produce (0.2 to 1.0 log CFU/g) and equipment surfaces (0.5 to 3.0 log CFU/cm2) across production steps. Equipment surface and produce microbial loads were correlated, but correlations varied from none to high depending on the equipment surface. For example, significant correlations (P < 0.01) included APC (ρ = 0.386) and Enterococcus (ρ = 0.562) with the harvest bin, E. coli (ρ = 0.372) and Enterococcus (ρ = 0.355) with the merry-go-round, Enterococcus (ρ = 0.679) with rinse cycle equipment, APC (ρ = 0.542) with the conveyer belt, and for all indicators with the packing box (ρ = 0.310 to 0.657). After controlling for crop type, sample replicate group, and sample location, there were significant positive associations between the log concentration of Enterococcus on produce and the harvest bin (β = 0.259, P < 0.01) and the rinse cycle (β = 0.010, P = 0.01), and between the log concentration of all indicators on produce and the packing box (β = 0.155 to 0.500, all P < 0.01). These statistically significant associations between microbial loads on packing facility surfaces and fresh produce confirm the importance of packing facility sanitation to protect produce quality and safety.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-210
Author(s):  
R. Rathinamoorthy ◽  
K. Gayathri Shree ◽  
R. Vaijayanthi ◽  
M. Brindha ◽  
A. Narmatha

Purpose The application of rinse cycle softener after the household laundry process has become more common in recent times. This study aims to understand the effect of repeated rinse cycle softener treatment on the mechanical and frictional properties of the cotton fabric. Design/methodology/approach Cotton-woven fabric is treated with commercial rinse cycle softener repeatedly for 15 times. After treatment, the fabric was evaluated for the changes in mechanical properties using the Kawabata evaluation system. Findings The results of this study revealed that the softener treatment reduces the tensile properties (41.25%) and increases the overall extensibility of the fabric up to 20.89%. The shear (34.57%) and bending rigidity of the treated fabric are reduced considerably than the untreated fabric (58.02%). The increment in the fabric softness and fluffiness was confirmed with the increment in the compression and the difference between the initial and final thickness at maximum pressure. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) is noted only in the case of bending and surface friction properties (dynamic friction). Originality/value The usage of rinse cycle softeners in the household laundry has a significant influence on the comfort characteristics of the cotton-woven fabric. Repeated usage of rinse cycle softener increased the fabric softness and fluffiness of the fabric and also reduced the tensile properties significantly.


2001 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floyd E. Friedli ◽  
Robert Keys ◽  
C. Joe Toney ◽  
Owen Portwood ◽  
Dave Whittlinger ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takako Igarashi ◽  
Naoki Morita ◽  
Yoshimasa Okamoto ◽  
Koichi Nakamura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document