A Woman's Kingdom: Noblewomen and the Control of Property in Russia, 1700-1861, and: Pravovoe regulirovanie imushchestvennykh otnoshenii v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XVIII veka [The Legal Regulation of Property Relations in Russia in the Second Half of the 18th Century], and: In Search of Legality: Mikhail M. Speranskii and the Codification of Russian Law (review)

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 657-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Elliott Butler
Keyword(s):  
18Th Century ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
Russian Law

scholarly journals Innovations and Analogies in the Legal Regulation of Withdrawal from a Limited Liability Company under Current Russian Law

Laws ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Viktor A. Mikryukov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Business Climate ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Freedom Of Contract ◽  
Study Find ◽  
Russian Law

The purpose of the study is to highlight the most significant legal gaps in the mechanism under study, find doctrinally relevant ways to overcome them casually in law enforcement, and propose options for generally filling the gaps in rulemaking. It is equally important to test the effectiveness of the analogy as a means to combat legal gaps. The methodological framework was formed by general (analysis, synthesis, abstraction, and concretization) and specific (comparative, formal, and technical legal) scientific research methods. The positive role of analogy as a method of combating legal uncertainty and the formation of legislative innovations was confirmed. The conclusion was made about the absence of a formal need for additional legislative authorization for Limited Liability Companies’ members to create a conditional or individualized withdrawal procedure. Backed by the legal analogy, the necessity to extend the freedom-of-contract doctrine in determining the fair value of a withdrawing shareholder’s share was argued. The achievements provided the basis for specific practical proposals to enhance existing Russian legislation and harmonize corporate relationships, which should improve Russia’s business climate.

PRINCIPLES OF LAW AS A BASIS FOR INTERSECTORAL COOPERATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 50-69
Author(s):  
M.Yu. LEBEDEV
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Main Mechanism ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Intersectoral Cooperation ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Free Treatment ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
Almost All

In the presented article the problems of interaction between the various branches of Russian law on the basis of legal principles are considered. The author, examining such concepts as “interaction” and “interrelation” states the fact that the issue of interaction of branches of law is considered by almost all researchers only from the position of listing those branches with which their branch of law interacts. At the same time, the construction of branch norms without taking into account the principles of the branch, where and the branch, from which the legal institute is implemented, leads to conflicts. Separate attention in the work is paid to the views of V.A. Riazanovskii and other scholars on the concept of “unity of process” in the context of interaction between the principles of various branches of law. The author examines the interaction of such branches of law as civil procedural law with civil, family law, arbitration and administrative process. The article draws attention to the cases of free treatment of the legislator with the category of “principles of law”, which, in the author’s opinion, leads to significant distortions of the entire branch of law, where principles not inherent in this branch are wrongly implanted. Studying institutes of law as the main mechanism of inter-branch interaction, the author comes to the conclusion about the need for legal regulation of interaction precisely through the principles of a branch of law.

scholarly journals The Evolution of Liability Measures Applied in Bankruptcy to Creditors’ Property Rights Violators in Russia

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 84-97
Author(s):  
A. V. Arbekova
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Critical Assessment ◽  
Bad Faith ◽  
Principle Of Justice ◽  
Historical Retrospect ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
Term Objective

One of the tasks the modern law in the field of insolvency of legal entities pursues is to ensure the maximum balance of the rules governing the measures of liability applied to managers, participants and other entities controlling the debtor. In this regard, the author applies historical and comparative method of studying the measures of responsibility applied during the development of domestic legal regulation of insolvency and the critical assessment method that forms the basis for the analysis of the current Russian legislation. The paper carries out a retrospective analysis of the form and degree of fault as an element of the offense that traditionally acted as one of the criteria for choosing the type of insolvency, as well as for imposing the measures of responsibility. A comparative analysis of the norms of the Russian bankrupt legislation in historical retrospect allowed raising problematic issues of the current legislation and making proposals aimed at their resolution. Currently, the rules of the current domestic insolvency legislation provide an equal amount of responsibility for both bad faith (intentional) and unreasonable (careless) actions of entities controlling the debtor. The normative consolidation of measures of responsibility dependent on the form of fault, namely, the separate qualification of intentional and careless offenses, will secure coherent application of the principle of justice. Modern Russian law contains the concepts of “insolvency” and “bankruptcy”, which in some cases creates legal uncertainty. Therefore, it is proposed to delineate these concepts by law, eliminate the term “objective bankruptcy” from the application, and shift its semantic burden to the concept of “insolvency”. Thereby, a separate category of insolvency will be included in the current legislation.

scholarly journals Features of the implementation of a public offer agreement in e-commerce in Ukrainian, Polish and Russian law

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 133-138
Author(s):  
Oleksandr Kosychenko ◽  
Illia Klinytskyi
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Electronic Format ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Provision Of Services ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
Public Offer

Given the specifics of the provision of services and sales of goods on the Internet, the contract of public offer is the most common and close to the electronic format of the agreement. However, in Ukraine, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Poland, as in other countries, the use of this type of legal instruments has a number of problems related to the legal regulation and the procedure for concluding an agreement. This paper examines the main aspects of the legal implementation of public offer agreements in the above countries. Thus, the subject of the study is the contract of public offering as a legal phenomenon. The purpose of the work is to determine the main problems of concluding a public offer contract in electronic mode, and to find optimal solutions in the context of the stated issues, based on the legislation and practice of selected countries

scholarly journals PROPERTY IN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY: CERTAIN PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION IN UKRAINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 52-61
Author(s):  
Oleksandra Rozhenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Activity ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Process Approach ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
Specific Category ◽  
Category Property ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Management Functions

The article examines the definition of the term «property» in management sphere, analyses the existing definitions of the term «property» in management sphere. On this basis, the different approaches are identified and a process approach to the interpretation of a specific category is proposed. Regarding the classification of the types of property and sources of its formation, the use of terms and concepts that have expired in the legislation has been established. It is proposed to eliminate the identified differences and contradictions in the interpretation of the terms of legal regulation of property relations in management sphere in Ukraine in view of the types of property and sources of its formation. The definition of the category «property» in management sphere, which is available in current legislation and modern scientific sources, is considered. The approaches to the definition of the term «property» in management sphere are singled out, namely: property is things, assets, property of a certain type, classification-based approach and combined approach. The definition of the essence of the term «property» in management sphere is proposed to be considered according to the process approach, which is initially considered resources, which later acquire the characteristics of assets and further property. The differences and ramifications in the classification types of property under the current legislation are analysed, the ways of their elimination are offered, which will lead to the increase of efficiency of the use of the created property of the economic entity. According to the process approach, which assumes that a certain set of resources acquires the characteristics of assets, which, in turn, are part of the property of a particular entity. A distinctive feature of the proposed approach is that the property in management sphere is defined as a set of assets that are formed through a number of resources. The use of the provided proposals and elimination of identified contradictions in the classification of property types and sources of its formation will promote the intensification of various management functions of economic activity in the part of implementing economic mechanisms and regulators to optimize property formation and increase of its efficiency.

Practical significance of law constitutional principles

2020 ◽  
pp. 435-441
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Paramonov
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Legal Consciousness ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Basic Ideas

We consider the constitutional principles of Russian law in the framework of positivist legal consciousness. We note the highest value of the law constitutional principles, as the basic ideas that underlie individual branches of law and all legal regulation. We focus on the practical significance of the constitutional principles of Russian law. We point out that in order to overcome defects in the legal consciousness of the population, it is advisable to duplicate the law principles that enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and in sectoral legislation. We emphasize that the practical significance of the law constitutional principles is manifested not only in their direct role in the legal regulation of public relations, but also in the fact that in judicial practice they can be used in the case of applying the analogy of law and the analogy of legislation. We indicate that this legal and technical tool is used to fill gaps in legal regulation. It is used in many branches of Russian law: civil, civil procedural, arbitration procedural, ad-ministrative procedural, family and others. Thus, the study shows the positive role of law constitutional principles in decision-making by a law enforcer in the absence of sectoral legal norms applicable in a particular situation.

MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY RELATIONS IN THE INTERNATIONAL FAMILY LAW: METHODOLOGY OF REGULATION

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yevhen Tkachenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Family Relations ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Essential Element ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
Law Regulation

As a result of this study, the family law regulation of matrimonial property relations was found to have its specific mechanism which is defined as a single system of legal ways and means providing mainly dispositive legal influence on family relations that allows significant influence of individual self-regulation and restrictions of prohibitions. At the present stage of study, this mechanism is considered as a ‘complex’ phenomenon which has several layers. Therefore, different interpretations of the mechanism for family law regulation of matrimonial property relations, derived at various levels, show not only their distinctive but also their common features. Determination of heterogeneous circumstances affecting the matrimonial property relations requires an analysis of the content and legal regulation of the relations related to property ones, since they are influenced by the mechanism for family law regulation of matrimonial property relations. Therefore, the methodology is the most essential element of this mechanism: it reveals the basic legal principles of family law regulation and directly connects legal tools with the objectively determined needs of social life by using the regulatory functions of law. The structure of the methodology of the mechanism for family law regulation of matrimonial property relations includes permits, prohibitions, instructions, incentives, obligations, sanctions and other ways to influence proper relationships. Methods of family law regulation are determined as methods of legal influence on the relevant social relations. They reflect the essence of a particular legal regime of regulation, while serving as a unifying principle which groups the system of family law and other legal phenomena within the institutions of family law. In this sense, the main methods of legal regulation are the method of subordination and the method of coordination. As a result, it is determined that each family law method reflects a special legal regime of regulation and depends on the formation of a specific set of techniques and means of regulation, among which a special place is occupied by general permits and general prohibitions.

DIGITAL FINANCIAL TOOLS FOR SOCIALIZING PRIVATE LAW

2021 ◽  
pp. 208-224
Author(s):  
Julia S. Kharitonova ◽  
◽  
Larisa V. Sannikova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
The United States ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
The World ◽  
The Law ◽  
Private Investors ◽  
The Way

Nowadays, the law is being transformed as a regulator of relations. The idea of strengthe-ning the regulatory role of technologies in the field of streamlining public relations is making much headway in the world. This trend is most pronounced in the area of regulation of private relations. The way of such access to the market as crowdfunding is becoming increasingly widespread. The issuing of the so-called secured tokens is becoming popular for both small businesses and private investors. The trust in new ways of attracting investments is condi-tioned by the applied technology - the use of blockchain as a decentralized transparent data-base management system. Under these conditions, there is such a phenomenon as the democ-ratization of property relations. Every individual receives unlimited opportunities to invest via technologies. Thus, legal scholars all over the world face the question about the role of the law and law in these relations? We believe that we are dealing with such a worldwide trend of regulating public relations as the socialization of the law. Specific examples of issuing tokens in Russia and abroad show the main global trends in the transformation of private law. The platformization of economics leads to the tokenization and democratization of property relations. In this aspect, the aim of lawyers should be to create a comfortable legal environment for the implementation of projects aimed at democratizing property relations in Russia. The socialization of private law is aimed at achieving social jus-tice and is manifested in the creation of mechanisms to protect the rights of the weak party and rules to protect private investors. Globalization requires the study of both Russian and foreign law. To confirm their hypothesis, the authors conducted a detailed analysis of the legislation of Russia, Europe and the United States to identify the norms allowing to see the process of socialization of law in the above field. The generalization of Russian and foreign experience showed that when searching for proper legal regulation, the states elect one of the policies. In some countries, direct regulation of ICOs and related emission relations are being created, in others, it is about the extension of the existing legislation to a new changing tokenization relationship. The European Union countries are seeking to develop common rules to create a regulatory environment to attract investors to the crypto industry and protect them. Asian countries are predominantly developing national legislation in isolation from one another, but most of them are following a unified course to encourage investment in crypto assets while introducing strict rules against fraud on financial markets. The emphasis on the protection of the rights of investors or shareholders, token holders by setting a framework, including private law mechanisms, can be called common to all approaches. This is the aim of private law on the way to social justice.

Сurrent issues in regulatory property relations of spouses

10.12737/2070 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 270-274
Author(s):  
Алла Серебрякова ◽  
Alla Serebryakova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Regulatory Property ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
The Past ◽  
Community Property ◽  
The Russian Federation

Over the past decade, the Russian Federation has changed the legal regulation of matrimonial property. Now there is a clear boundary between the personal and community property in law, but also formed the practice of the current legislation regulating property relations between spouses.

scholarly journals PROPERTY RELATIONS IN KYRGYZ FAMILY: LEGAL ASPECTS

THE BULLETIN ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (388) ◽  
pp. 249-256
Author(s):  
Murzabekova Zh.T., ◽  
◽  
Nasbekova S.K., ◽  
Osmonalieva N.Zh., ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Child Protection ◽  
Common Property ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Kyrgyz Republic ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
The Family ◽  
Family Code

The article provides legal analysis of features of family property relations in the custom law of the Kyrgyz people and the legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic. Using analysis, synthesis, legal and historical law methods, the Matrimony and Family Code of the Kyrgyz SSR of 1969, the Family Code of the Kyrgyz Republic of 2003, the Code of Laws on Civil Status Acts, Matrimony, Family and Fiduciary Law of the RSFSR of 1918, The Code of Laws on Marriage, Family and Fiduciary of the RSFSR of 1926, The Ordinance of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic dated January 26, 2012 No. 17 “On declaring 2012 the Year of Family, Peace, Concordance and Mutual Forgiveness” and Family Support and Child Protection Program for 2018 - 2028 of Government of the Kyrgyz Republic were studied. The article analyzes relevant theoretical and practical issues related to common property of spouses, separate property of spouses, relations between parents and children for joint ownership and use of each other's property, alimony responsibility of family members and property relations of factual spouses. According to the author, legal norms regulating property relations in family are important when courts consider cases in sphere of protection of property rights of family members. In particular, the authors came to the conclusion in the Kyrgyz Republic the legal regulation of property relations in family is basis for resolving contentious issues in the family law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document