“We as Black Men Have to Encourage Each other:” Facilitators and Barriers Associated with HIV Testing among Black/African American Men in Rural Florida

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 487-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Murray ◽  
Lauren Toledo ◽  
Emma (EJ) Brown ◽  
Madeline Y. Sutton
Author(s):  
Seth C Kalichman ◽  
Renee El-Krab ◽  
Bruno Shkembi ◽  
Moira O Kalichman ◽  
Lisa A Eaton

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound health and social impacts. COVID-19 also affords opportunities to study the emergence of prejudice as a factor in taking protective actions. This study investigated the association of COVID-19 concerns, prejudicial beliefs, and personal actions that involve life disruptions among people not living with and people living with HIV. 338 Black/African American men not living with HIV who reported male sex partners and 148 Black/African American men living with HIV who reported male sex partners completed a confidential survey that measured COVID-19 concern, COVID-19 prejudice, and personal action and institutionally imposed COVID-19 disruptions. Participants reported having experienced multiple social and healthcare disruptions stemming from COVID-19, including reductions in social contacts, canceling medical appointments, and inability to access medications. Mediation analyses demonstrated that COVID-19 concerns and COVID-19 prejudice were associated with personal action disruptions, indicating that these social processes are important for understanding how individuals modified their lives in response to COVID-19. It is imperative that public health efforts combat COVID-19 prejudice as these beliefs undermine investments in developing healthcare infrastructure to address COVID-19 prevention.


2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (12) ◽  
pp. 4071-4111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcella Alsan ◽  
Owen Garrick ◽  
Grant Graziani

We study the effect of physician workforce diversity on the demand for preventive care among African American men. In an experiment in Oakland, California, we randomize black men to black or non-black male medical doctors. We use a two-stage design, measuring decisions before (pre-consultation) and after (post-consultation) meeting their assigned doctor. Subjects select a similar number of preventives in the pre-consultation stage, but are much more likely to select every preventive service, particularly invasive services, once meeting with a racially concordant doctor. Our findings suggest black doctors could reduce the black-white male gap in cardiovascular mortality by 19 percent. (JEL I12, I14, C93)


Cancer ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1017-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Diane Woods ◽  
Susanne B. Montgomery ◽  
R. Patti Herring

2013 ◽  
Vol 103 (10) ◽  
pp. 1851-1856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna H. McCree ◽  
Gregorio Millett ◽  
Chanza Baytop ◽  
Scott Royal ◽  
Jonathan Ellen ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Mashburn ◽  
John L. Peterson ◽  
Roger Bakeman ◽  
Robin L. Miller ◽  
Leslie F. Clark ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Stephen Meyer

This chapter considers how the increase in numbers of African American men at the workplace brought differing and contentious visions of manhood to the automotive factory. White men, who had long dominated the better jobs, divided into two groups: those who strove for the respectability of high-paid union jobs and those who resented others, fearing the loss of their exclusive white privileges. When black men fought for workplace equity, the more conservative whites conducted racial hate strikes to protect traditionally “white” jobs. In reaction, African American workers conducted what might best be labeled “pride strikes” to gain access to better jobs and later to improve the inequitable situation of black women in the automobile factories. These workplace struggles involved robust clashes over differing visions of manhood.


2008 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew E. Petroll ◽  
Wayne DiFranceisco ◽  
Timothy L. McAuliffe ◽  
David W. Seal ◽  
Jeffrey A. Kelly ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 68S-72S ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Metzl

This commentary describes ways in which notions of African American men’s “health” attained by individual choice—embedded in the notion that African American men should visit doctors or engage in fewer risky behaviors—are at times in tension with larger cultural, economic, and political notions of “health.” It argues that efforts to improve the health of Black men must take structural factors into account, and failure to do so circumvents even well-intentioned efforts to improve health outcomes. Using historical examples, the article shows how attempts to identify and intervene into what are now called social determinants of health are strengthened by addressing on-the-ground diagnostic disparities and also the structural violence and racism embedded within definitions of illness and health. And, that, as such, we need to monitor structural barriers to health that exist in institutions ostensibly set up to incarcerate or contain Black men and in institutions ostensibly set up to help them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document