scholarly journals A Community-Based Participatory Research on Smoking Cessation Intervention for Urban Communities

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando A. Wagner ◽  
Payam Sheikhattari ◽  
Jane Buccheri ◽  
Mary Gunning ◽  
Lisa Bleich ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noella A. Dietz ◽  
Monica Webb Hooper ◽  
Margaret M. Byrne ◽  
Antoine Messiah ◽  
Elizabeth A. Baker ◽  
...  

Background: While smoking rates in the United States have decreased, some population subgroups have smoking rates that exceed national and state averages. These higher rates often are associated with higher incidence rates of tobacco-associated cancers. Over time, a decrease in smoking rates leads to lower cancer incidence.Methods: Using spatial modelling techniques, we identified an underserved geographic locale in South Florida with higher than expected incidence rates of tobacco-associated cancers. We then used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) design to conduct focus groups in 2011 to elicit information about the acceptability of a smoking cessation intervention delivered by trained former smokers from within peer networks.Results: A variety of smoking cessation strategies was presented and discussed in separate, gender-stratified focus groups comprised of former and current smokers (n = 39). Focus group findings consistently indicated that support groups were the preferred cessation mechanism in this community. Based on this finding, we changed our initially proposed cessation approach to one which employed support groups as a quit method.Conclusions: Currently, we are collecting pilot data to test this intervention and to reach smokers who might not otherwise be directly targeted with cessation messaging from larger tobacco control initiatives. If successful, this strategy can be adapted to effect other important changes in health behaviours in at-risk populations.


Urban Health ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 272-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara A. Israel ◽  
Amy J. Schulz ◽  
Chris M. Coombe ◽  
Edith A. Parker ◽  
Angela G. Reyes ◽  
...  

The study of urban populations must be grounded in the realities of local communities. Much as many insights of urban health are generalizable to the health of cities worldwide, local knowledge both can and is necessary to guide action that can improve the health of urban populations. Community-based participatory research is an approach to research that has a particular role in both the study of urban communities and in developing interventions and policies that can improve the health of these populations. This chapter discusses the principles and strategies of community-based participatory research and how their applications can guide the study and practice of urban health towards achieving health equity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen A. Culhane-Pera ◽  
Shannon L. Pergament ◽  
Maiyia Y. Kasouaher ◽  
Andrew M. Pattock ◽  
Naima Dhore ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Healthcare quality measurements in the United States illustrate disparities by racial/ethnic group, socio-economic class, and geographic location. Redressing healthcare inequities, including measurement of and reimbursement for healthcare quality, requires partnering with communities historically excluded from decision-making. Quality healthcare is measured according to insurers, professional organizations and government agencies, with little input from diverse communities. This community-based participatory research study aimed to amplify the voices of community leaders from seven diverse urban communities in Minneapolis-Saint Paul Minnesota, view quality healthcare and financial reimbursement based on quality metric scores. Methods A Community Engagement Team consisting of one community member from each of seven urban communities —Black/African American, Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender-Queer-Two Spirit, Hmong, Latino/a/x, Native American, Somali, and White—and two community-based researchers conducted listening sessions with 20 community leaders about quality primary healthcare. Transcripts were inductively analyzed and major themes were identified. Results Listening sessions produced three major themes, with recommended actions for primary care clinics. #1: Quality Clinics Utilize Structures and Processes that Support Healthcare Equity. #2: Quality Clinics Offer Effective Relationships, Education, and Health Promotion. #3: Funding Based on Current Quality Measures Perpetuates Health Inequities. Conclusion Community leaders identified ideal characteristics of quality primary healthcare, most of which are not currently measured. They expressed concern that linking clinic payment with quality metrics without considering social and structural determinants of health perpetuates social injustice in healthcare.


2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 725-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda E Carlson ◽  
Paul Taenzer ◽  
Jan Koopmans ◽  
Barry D Bultz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document