Imagining Robin Hood: The Late-Medieval Stories in Historical Context (review)

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-255
Author(s):  
Janine. Rogers ◽  
Janine. Rogers
2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti

This paper presents a case study of the fifty earliest English wills in the Court of Probate, London, with a view to contributing towards highlighting the historical development of this legal genre. By analysing these documents from a pragmatic perspective and setting them in a diachronic framework, I show how the realisation of the act of bequeathing is highly dependent on the socio-cultural context of production and use. Late medieval wills are utterly different from Anglo-Saxon ones in that they are the product of a relatively literate culture in which drafters followed the format of Latin testaments; in this sense late medieval wills are similar to modern ones because they conform to the model of autonomous, formal text. However, they do not fulfil all the felicity conditions necessary to achieve their full constitutive potential as the authority validating these documents remains rooted in religious practices rather than in legal enforcement. This paper offers evidence in favour of the view that a proper pragmatic analysis of medieval documents can only be achieved by taking the historical context into account.


Author(s):  
Eric Leland Saak

When Martin Luther entered the Order of Hermits of St. Augustine in July of 1505, he entered a world that had been shaped by the diverse and varied monastic culture of the later Middle Ages. Luther became a new man in Christ by donning his monastic habit and very quickly rose to positions of responsibility within the order, first as a doctor of theology and then as district vicar. As professor of the Bible at Wittenberg, Luther was also the pastor of the parish church and, in this context, initiated a pastoral concern with the practice and theology of indulgences that was to set off what has become known as the Reformation. His critique was that of a late medieval Augustinian Hermit. Yet Luther had not been inculcated with the theological or spiritual traditions of his order. Consequently, his early theological development was conditioned by the Franciscan tradition (e.g., Ockham) more than by the Augustinian, even as he eagerly studied the works of Augustine himself. Nevertheless, when Luther came into conflict with the papacy, he remained an obedient friar. The origins of his Reformation, therefore, must be analyzed in the context of his monastic life and the monastic culture of his world. Unfortunately, scholarship has devoted little attention to the monastic world Luther entered. While there has been much debate for over a century over the extent to which Luther inherited his Augustinian theology from members of his order, the order as such has receded into the background, with the focus being on abstract theological positions. Further research on Luther and the late medieval monastic world has the opportunity to shed new light on the development of Luther’s theology, going beyond the debate over continuity. When Luther stood before Emperor Charles V at Worms in 1521, he did so as Brother Martin Luther, a faithful, obedient, observant Augustinian Hermit. He remained such even as he published his harsh critique of the compulsory nature of monastic vows, while he nevertheless still gave validity to living the monastic life, providing one did so freely. He broke from his monastic past only in 1524 when he finally took off his habit and then, less than a year later, married Katharina von Bora. With Luther’s marriage to Katie, he put his monastic life behind him. To understand Luther’s early development, therefore, we cannot rely on his own later reflections but must return to analyze anew the historical context of that development, and that context was his monastic life and the culture of late medieval monasticism.


Author(s):  
Mariana Valeria Parma

El concepto de cielo adquirió múltiples significados en distintos contextos históricos. Asociado a la idea del más allá, la noción también remite a la esfera celeste donde se hallan los astros y la temática se vincula con las diversas representaciones del universo que se desplegaron a través de los tiempos. Las visiones celestes guardan estrecha relación con el contexto histórico en el que se imponen y particularmente con los fundamentos del orden social entonces vigente. En este artículo nos proponemos rastrear, desde una perspectiva de análisis de historia cultural, las representaciones del cielo imperantes en los tiempos medievales y en particular establecer la significación de la mirada apocalíptica. La particular ambivalencia de la apocalíptica cristiana funcionará como punto de partida para la ruptura de significados que produjo la lectura bajomedieval de estas ideas en el contexto crítico feudal con consecuencias decisivas para el orden social.AbstractThe concept of heaven acquired multiple meanings in different historical contexts. Linked to the idea of the hereafter, the notion also refers to the celestial sphere where the stars are found and the theme is linked to various representations of the universe that developed throughout the ages. The celestial visions are closely related to the historical context in which they appear and particularly to the foundations of the prevailing social order of the time. In this article, we propose to trace the representations of heaven that prevailed in medieval times, from a cultural history approach, and in particular, to establish the meaning of the apocalyptic view. The particular ambivalence of Christian apocalyptics is a starting point for the transformation of meanings produced by late medieval readings of these ideas in a critical feudal context with decisive consequences for the social order.


1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Cohen

The ArgumentThe study of pain in a historical context requires a consideration of the cultural context in which pain is sensed and expressed. This paper examines attitudes toward physical pain in the later Middle Ages in Europe from several standpoints: theology, law, and medicine. During the later Middle Ages attitudes toward pain shifted from rejection and a demand for impassivity as a mark of status to a conscious attempt to sense, express, and inflict as much pain as possible. Pain became a positive force, a useful tool for reaching a variety of truths. While this attitude stemmed from the religious wish to identify with Christ's passion, it permeated and affected all spheres of cultural expression and investigation. Late permeated and affected all spheres of cultural expression and investigation. Late medieval medicine accepted pain, trying to relieve it only when it became dangerous to the patient. Given the existence of analgesic medicines at the time, this attitude is comprehensible only within the cultural context of the period.


2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-134
Author(s):  
Michael P. Carroll

A number of reformist commentators in late medieval England suggested that stories about Robin Hood were especially popular with people who were not especially devout. On the other hand, notwithstanding these reformist comments, we also have evidence that Robin Hood stories were sometimes used as sermon exempla, which suggests that they were seen (at least by some preachers) as promoting acceptable forms of Catholic devotion. At one level, the use of these stories as sermon exempla derived from the fact that in these early stories (quite unlike later stories) Robin was depicted as committed to the Mass and devoted to the Virgin Mary. The real value of these early stories about Robin Hood, however, is that they allow us to problematize two historiographical assumptions that continue to guide the thinking of English historians studying late medieval Catholicism. Thus, English historians (including the revisionist historians who have otherwise done so much to document the vitality of English Catholicism on the eve of the Reformation) continue to mimic official Catholic doctrine in suggesting that for English Catholics, Christ was the supernatural being who stood atop the Catholic pantheon, and that Mary and the saints were viewed only as intercessors with no independent power of their own. By contrast, the evidence from the Robin Hood stories (and from other stories used as sermon exempla) very explicitly depicts a rank ordering in which Mary not only had independent power, but independent power which eclipsed that of her Son.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document