Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis Revisited

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1486-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisel Segarra-Newnham ◽  
Augustus Hough

Objective: To review studies of antibiotic prophylaxis in acute necrotizing pancreatitis published in the last decade and update recommendations. Data Sources: A search of PubMed (1998–July 2009) was conducted using the terms necrotizing pancreatitis, antibiotics, prophylaxis, and treatment. Clinical studies, meta-analyses, and review articles published in English were included. Additional references were obtained from article bibliographies. Randomized trials published before 1998 were included if indicated. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant studies or meta-analyses on antibiotic prophylaxis since our previous review in 1998 were evaluated; older data were included if still relevant. Data Synthesis: Since our previous review, 4 more randomized trials, including 2 double-blind trials, have been conducted. The blinded studies found no significant difference in mortality with antibiotic prophylaxis compared with placebo, while the unblinded studies found a significant decrease in infections. Given these disparate results, available guidelines and meta-analyses provide different conclusions, usually based on exclusion or inclusion of a single trial. Based on all available data, antibiotic prophylaxis should not be used in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Instead, a more measured, on-demand use of antibiotics is preferred. Antibiotics should be added if signs and symptoms of infection are present (eg, fever, leukocytosis, positive results of cultures). Given improvements in intensive care and nutritional support, recent trials have found a lower incidence of infected necrotizing pancreatitis than before. Therefore, future trials are likely to need higher numbers of patients. Conclusions: Use of antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with necrotizing pancreatitis is not indicated, based on 2 blinded trials. Instead, on-demand use of antibiotics appears to be appropriate. Given progress in intensive care and the high crossover rate in studies, the need for antibiotic prophylaxis may continue to be debated for decades.

2000 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. De Waele ◽  
U. J. Hesse ◽  
P. Pattyn ◽  
J. Decruyenaere ◽  
B. de Hemptinne

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
O. V. Rotar

Objective: to establish changes of intestinal functions, including absorbing and metabolic, and their influence on complications development during phases of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Material and methods. A prospective observational cohort study of 151 patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis which were admitted to intensive care department was conducted. Severity of intestinal dysfunction was determined according to European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Recommendations. Clinical and laboratory changes as well as plasma citrulline concentrations were studied. Results and discussion. Disorders of gastrointestinal functions of 1st grade were found in 17.9%, 2nd grade – 29.1%, 3rd grade – 31.7%, 4th grade – 8.6% of patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Serum citrulline concentration below 12.5 µmol/l enabled to diagnose development of intestinal failure. It was established by multivariate logistic regression that respiratory, cardio-vascular, renal and intestinal failure were independent mortality factors. Conclusions:  Disorders of gastrointestinal functions in 35.8% of patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis are represented by feeding intolerance, in 33.2% - by intestinal failure. Plasma citrulline concentration enables to diagnose development of intestinal failure with high sensitivity and specificity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document