Bevacizumab: A Treatment Option for Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme

2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 1486-1490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry W Buie ◽  
John M Valgus
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Objective: To review the available literature evaluating the effect of bevacizumab on progression-free survival when used in combination with irinotecan for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Data Sources: Searches of MEDLINE (1966-June 2008), the Cochrane Library. and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-June 2008) were conducted using the terms bevacizumab. irinotecan, and glioblastoma multiforme. Study Selection And Data Extraction: The search was limited to studies conducted in humans. All articles identified trom the data sources were evaluated. All clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent GBM were included in the review. Data Synthesis: Hypoxia, mutagenesis, and the secretion of various growth (actors can all lead to production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a proangiogenic growth factor, and angiogenesis in GBM. Neoplastic progression is dependent on angiogenesis, and anti-VEGF therapy has been successful in multiple disease states. However, there are currently no available anti-VEGF therapies approved tor treatment of GBM. Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits the activity of VEGF. When compared with data from clinical trials that use single chemotherapeutic agents in recurrent GBM, the addition of bevacizumab to cytotoxic chemotherapy, such as irinotecan, appears to improve progression-Iree survival in patients progressing on the standard of care, with a 6-month progression-free survival rate of 46%. Bevacizumab is well tolerated by most patients, with modest risk (11% tn Phase 2 trials) of venous thromboembolism. Conclusions: Although the combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan is producing positive results in patients with recurrent GBM, larger, randomized clinical trials need to be performed to determine the magnitude of the benefit from bevacizumab. Bevacizumab administered biweekly at a dose of 10 mg/kg in combination with irinotecan may improve progression-free survival.

Phase I/II dose-escalation study of VB-111, an antiangiogenic gene therapy, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2102-TPS2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Jacob Brenner ◽  
Yael Cohen ◽  
James J Vredenburgh ◽  
Katherine B. Peters ◽  
Eyal Breitbart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

TPS2102 Background: VB-111 is an anti-angiogenic agent consisting of a non-replicating adenovirus vector (Ad-5) with a modified murine pre-proendothelin promoter leading to apoptosis of tumor vasculature by expressing a fas-chimera transgene in angiogenic endothelial cells. In a phase I/II dose-escalation study, safety and efficacy of VB-111 in patients with recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) were evaluated. Methods: VB-111 was administered as a single intravenous infusion at escalating doses from 1x1012 to 3x1012 viral particles (VPs), followed by repeat doses of 3x1012 or 1x1013every 2 months. Assessments included safety, pharmacokinetics, tumor response (RANO criteria) and overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty eight patients aged 26 – 74 years at 3 medical centers in the US received up to 8 repeat doses of VB-111. The median OS was 360 [range: 70-574] and 266 days [range: 28-664] for patients receiving at least one dose of 1x1013VPs (high dose) vs. subjects who received lower doses, respectively (p NS). Progression free survival was 87 vs 55 days for patients who received high dose and for lower doses, respectively (p = 0.01). Median follow-up was 232 days. Three patients had a partial response (PR) at 82, 86 and 408 days post initial VB-111 dosing. Twenty one of the patients who progressed on VB-111 treatment received bevacizumab off study; 7 of the 15 evaluable patients (47%) had a PR compared to 30% expected according to literature. VB-111 was safe and well tolerated, 53 adverse events were reported, 14 were classified as possibly related to VB-111. All events were of CTCAE grade 1-2 except one grade 3 pulmonary embolism. There were no study related deaths. One patient developed peri-tumoral edema, which resolved with corticosteroid therapy. Events occurring in > 10% of the patients included headache and fatigue. Conclusions: VB-111 was safe and well tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM with repeat doses of up to 1x1013 VPs. Tumor responses were seen. Overall survival was about 3 months longer than historical data in recurrent GBM, including standard of care anti-angiogenic agents. Data suggests that VB-111 potentiates the response to bevacizumab given at further progression. Clinical trial information: NCT01260506.

Phase II clinical trial of Wilms tumor 1 peptide vaccination for patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

2008 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 963-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuichi Izumoto ◽  
Akihiro Tsuboi ◽  
Yoshihiro Oka ◽  
Tsuyoshi Suzuki ◽  
Tetsuo Hashiba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Wilms Tumor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Vaccine Therapy ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Responses ◽  
Positive Recurrent ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Object The object of this study was to investigate the safety and clinical responses of immunotherapy targeting the WT1 (Wilms tumor 1) gene product in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Methods Twenty-one patients with WT1/HLA-A*2402–positive recurrent GBM were included in a Phase II clinical study of WT1 vaccine therapy. In all patients, the tumors were resistant to standard therapy. Patients received intra-dermal injections of an HLA-A*2402–restricted, modified 9-mer WT1 peptide every week for 12 weeks. Tumor size, which was obtained by measuring the contrast-enhanced area on magnetic resonance images, was determined every 4 weeks. The responses were analyzed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 12 weeks after the initial vaccination. Patients who achieved an effective response continued to be vaccinated until tumor progression occurred. Progression-free survival and overall survival after initial WT1 treatment were estimated. Results The protocol was well tolerated; only local erythema occurred at the WT1 vaccine injection site. The clinical responses were as follows: partial response in 2 patients, stable disease in 10 patients, and progressive disease in 9 patients. No patient had a complete response. The overall response rate (cases with complete or partial response) was 9.5%, and the disease control rate (cases with complete or partial response as well as those in which disease was stable) was 57.1%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) period was 20.0 weeks, and the 6-month (26-week) PFS rate was 33.3%. Conclusions Although a small uncontrolled nonrandomized trial, this study showed that WT1 vaccine therapy for patients with WT1/HLA-A*2402–positive recurrent GBM was safe and produced a clinical response. Based on these results, further clinical studies of WT1 vaccine therapy in patients with malignant glioma are warranted.

Safety and efficacy of permanent iodine-125 seed implants and carmustine wafers in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

2008 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borimir J. Darakchiev ◽  
Robert E. Albright ◽  
John C. Breneman ◽  
Ronald E. Warnick
Keyword(s):  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Brain Necrosis ◽  
Bcnu Wafers ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Object Effective treatment options are limited for patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and survival is usually <1 year. Novel treatment approaches are needed. Localized adjunct treatment with carmustine (BCNU) wafers or permanent, low-activity 125I seed implants has been shown to be effective for GBM. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of these therapies in combination following tumor resection. Methods Thirty-four patients with recurrent GBM were treated with maximal tumor resection followed by implantation of BCNU wafers and permanent 125I seeds into the tumor cavity. Patients were followed up with clinical evaluations and magnetic resonance imaging studies once every 3 months. Survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Results During follow-up, local disease progression was observed in 27 patients, and 23 of them died. The median survival period was 69 weeks, and the median PFS was 47 weeks. The 12-month survival and PFS rates were 66 and 32%, respectively. Baseline factors associated with prolonged survival included Karnofsky Performance Scale score ≥ 70, 125I seed activity ≥ 0.8 mCi/cm3 of tumor cavity, and age < 60 years. Brain necrosis developed in 8 patients (24%) and was successfully treated with surgery or hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Conclusions The use of adjunct therapy combining BCNU wafers and permanent 125I seeds resulted in survival that compares favorably with data from similar studies performed in patients with recurrent GBM. The incidence of brain necrosis appeared to be higher than that expected with either treatment alone, although the necrosis was manageable and did not affect survival. This novel approach warrants further investigation in recurrent and newly diagnosed GBM.

scholarly journals Rekurrens glioblastomában szenvedő betegek kezelése bevacizumab-monoterápiával

2016 ◽  
Vol 157 (13) ◽  
pp. 500-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dániel Sinkó ◽  
Csaba Nemeskéri
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction: The prognosis of patients with recurrent glioblastoma is poor, as the median survival does not exceed 6 months. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Method: From April, 2012 to June, 2015, 40 patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme were treated with bevacizumab in a dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Results: The average progression-free survival was 6.4 months (2–22 months), and the 6-month progression-free survival was 42.5%. The six-month overall survival was 82.5%, which corresponds to those published in the literature. Conclusions: Bevacizumab monotherapy improves progression-free survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(13), 500–503.

scholarly journals Phase II Trial of Vorinostat in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 2052-2058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evanthia Galanis ◽  
Kurt A. Jaeckle ◽  
Matthew J. Maurer ◽  
Joel M. Reid ◽  
Matthew M. Ames ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Rest Period ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

PurposeVorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, represents a rational therapeutic target in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).Patients and MethodsPatients with recurrent GBM who had received one or fewer chemotherapy regimens for progressive disease were eligible. Vorinostat was administered at a dose of 200 mg orally twice a day for 14 days, followed by a 7-day rest period.ResultsA total of 66 patients were treated. Grade 3 or worse nonhematologic toxicity occurred in 26% of patients and consisted mainly of fatigue (17%), dehydration (6%), and hypernatremia (5%); grade 3 or worse hematologic toxicity occurred in 26% of patients and consisted mainly of thrombocytopenia (22%). Pharmacokinetic analysis showed lower vorinostat maximum concentration and area under the curve (0 to 24 hours) values in patients treated with enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants, although this did not reach statistical significance. The trial met the prospectively defined primary efficacy end point, with nine of the first 52 patients being progression-free at 6 months. Median overall survival from study entry was 5.7 months (range, 0.7 to 28+ months). Immunohistochemical analysis performed in paired baseline and post-vorinostat treatment samples in a separate surgical subgroup of five patients with recurrent GBM showed post treatment increase in acetylation of histones H2B and H4 (four of five patients) and of histone H3 (three of five patients). Microarray RNA analysis in the same samples showed changes in genes regulated by vorinostat, such as upregulation of E-cadherin (P = .02).ConclusionVorinostat monotherapy is well tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM and has modest single-agent activity. Histone acetylation analysis and RNA expression profiling indicate that vorinostat in this dose and schedule affects target pathways in GBM. Additional testing of vorinostat in combination regimens is warranted.

A stratified phase II study of cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: Preliminary results

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1558-1558 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sadones ◽  
C. Chaskis ◽  
E. J. Joosens ◽  
L. A. Dhondt ◽  
J. Baurain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Gene Copy Number ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Gene Copy ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Egfr Gene ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

1558 Background: The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene is frequently amplified and mutated in high-grade gliomas. We are investigating the activity of the EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibody cetuximab for the treatment of patients (pts) with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) following surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Methods: Adult pts with recurrent GBM are allocated to two parallel treatment strata according to the amplification status of the EGFR gene (determined by FISH). According to a Simon two-stage phase II study design 1 response in 13 pts/stratum is required to continue recruitment and complete the second stage of pt recruitment. Cetuximab is administered at 400 mg/m2 (2 hour infusion) day 1 and 250 mg/m2 day 8 and for all subsequent weekly doses (1 hour infusion). Results: Between May and December 2005, 17 pts were recruited (10 without EGFR-ampl, 4 with EGFR-ampl and 3 under investigation); 4F/13M; median age 51 years, range 32–67). Recruitment is ongoing. Sixteen pts initiated study treatment; 1 pt withdrew consent before the initiation of therapy. Treatment related toxicity in the first 94 treatment cycles consisted of grade 1/2 folliculitis/dermitis in all treated pts. Grade 3 adverse events consisted of thrombocytopenia (n=1 pt), diminished consciousness (n=1 pt), dizziness/confusion (n=1 pt), infectious bronchopneumonia (n=1 pt), and infectious cellulitis (n=1 pt). Thirteen pts have been evaluated for response ≤ week 8 of study treatment. Eleven pts had progression of disease. Two patients had SD at 8 weeks (follow-up is ongoing). Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that cetuximab can be safely administered to pretreated patients with recurrent GBM. Updated results regarding safety and activity as well as a correlative study of EGFR and PTEN expression and gene copy number of the GBM and response to cetuximab will be presented at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Nivolumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma progressing on bevacizumab: A retrospective case series.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13538-e13538
Author(s):  
Marc C. Chamberlain ◽  
Bryan T. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Unmet Need ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
First Recurrence ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

e13538 Objective: A single institution retrospective evaluation of nivolumab following disease progression on bevacizumab in adults with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with an objective of determining progression free survival (PFS). Background: There is no accepted therapy for recurrent GBM after failure of bevacizumab. Methods: 16 adults, ages 52-72 years (median 62), with recurrent GBM were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery, concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide, and post-radiotherapy temozolomide. Bevacizumab (with or without lomustine) was administered to all patients at first recurrence. Patients were treated with nivolumab only (3mg/kg) once every 2 weeks at second recurrence. One cycle of nivolumab was defined as 2 treatments. Neurological evaluation was performed bi-weekly and neuroradiographic assessment every 4 weeks. Results: A total of 37 treatment cycles (median 2) were administered of nivolumab in which there were 14 Grade 2 adverse events (AEs) and Grade 3 AEs in 2 patients. No Grade 4 or 5 AEs were seen. Following 1 month of nivolumab, 7 patients’ demonstrated progressive disease and discontinued therapy. No patient demonstrated a response though 9 patients demonstrated neuroradiographic stable response. Survival in the entire cohort ranged from 2 - 6 months with a median of 3.5 months (CI: 2.8, 4.2). Median and 6-month PFS at 6 months was 2.0 months (range 1-5 months; CI: 1.3, 2.7) and 0% respectively. Conclusions: Nivolumab salvage therapy demonstrated no survival advantage in patients with recurrent bevacizumab refractory GBM emphasizing a continued unmet need in neuro-oncology.

Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (30) ◽  
pp. 4722-4729 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Vredenburgh ◽  
Annick Desjardins ◽  
James E. Herndon ◽  
Jennifer Marcello ◽  
David A. Reardon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Initial Cohort ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose The prognosis for patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme is poor, with a median survival of 3 to 6 months. We performed a phase II trial of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, in combination with irinotecan. Patients and Methods This phase II trial included two cohorts of patients. The initial cohort, comprising 23 patients, received bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg plus irinotecan every 2 weeks. The dose of irinotecan was based on the patient's anticonvulsant: Patients taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) received 340 mg/m2, and patients not taking EIAEDs received 125 mg/m2. After this regimen was deemed safe and effective, the irinotecan schedule was changed to an accepted brain tumor regimen of four doses in 6 weeks, in anticipation of a phase III randomized trial of irinotecan versus irinotecan and bevacizumab. The second cohort, comprising 12 patients, received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 21 days and irinotecan on days 1, 8, 22, and 29. Each cycle was 6 weeks long and concluded with patient evaluations, including magnetic resonance imaging. Results The 6-month progression-free survival among all 35 patients was 46% (95% CI, 32% to 66%). The 6-month overall survival was 77% (95% CI, 64% to 92%). Twenty of the 35 patients (57%; 95% CI, 39% to 74%) had at least a partial response. One patient developed a CNS hemorrhage, which occurred in his 10th cycle. Four patients developed thromboembolic complications (deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary emboli). Conclusion Bevacizumab and irinotecan is an effective treatment for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and has moderate toxicity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document