scholarly journals Test-Retest Reliability of Multiple Sleep Latency Test in Diagnosis of Narcolepsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-180
Author(s):  
Min Jae Seong ◽  
Su Jung Choi ◽  
Seung Bong Hong ◽  
Eun Yeon Joo
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency

scholarly journals Test–Retest Reliability of the Multiple Sleep Latency Test in Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence

SLEEP ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Régis Lopez ◽  
Anis Doukkali ◽  
Lucie Barateau ◽  
Elisa Evangelista ◽  
Sofiene Chenini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency

scholarly journals 1253 Multiple sleep onset REM episodes in middle age woman with excessive daytime sleepiness – Is this automatically assumed narcolepsy?

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A477-A477
Author(s):  
Kamal Patel ◽  
Bianca J Lang
Keyword(s):  
Daytime Sleepiness ◽  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Sleep Onset ◽  
Sleep Time ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency Test ◽  
Sleep Onset Latency ◽  
Onset Latency ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Falling Asleep ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency

Abstract Introduction Presence of sleep onset REM episodes often raises concerns of narcolepsy. However other conditions have shown to have presence of sleep on REM episodes which include but not limited to obstructive sleep apnea, sleep wake schedule disturbance, alcoholism, neurodegenerative disorders, depression and anxiety Report of Case Here we present a case of 30 year old female with history of asthma, patent foraman ovale, migraine headache, and anxiety who presented with daytime sleepiness, falling asleep while at work, occasional scheduled naps, non-restorative sleep, sleep paralysis, and hypnopompic hallucination. Pertinent physical exam included; mallampati score of 4/4, retrognathia, high arched hard palate, crowded posterior oropharynx. She had a score of 16 on Epworth sleepiness scale. Patient previously had multiple sleep latency test at outside facility which revealed 4/5 SOREM, with mean sleep onset latency of 11.5 minutes. She however was diagnosed with narcolepsy and tried on modafinil which she failed to tolerate. She was tried on sertraline as well which was discontinued due to lack of benefit. She had repeat multiple sleep latency test work up which revealed 2/5 SOREM, with mean sleep onset latency was 13.1 minutes. Her overnight polysomnogram prior to repeat MSLT showed SOREM with sleep onset latency of 10 minutes. Actigraphy showed consistent sleep pattern overall with sufficient sleep time but was taking hydroxyzine and herbal medication. Patient did not meet criteria for hypersomnolence disorder and sleep disordered breathing. Conclusion There is possibility her medication may have played pivotal role with her daytime symptoms. We also emphasize SOREMs can be present in other disorders such as anxiety in this case and not solely in narcolepsy

scholarly journals Periodic hypersomnia, congenital ectodermal disorders and multiple exostosis

1989 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubens Reimão ◽  
Aron Diament
Keyword(s):  
Acanthosis Nigricans ◽  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Mental Deficiency ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency Test ◽  
Incontinentia Pigmenti ◽  
Congenital Disorders ◽  
Hereditary Multiple Exostosis ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency

A case of periodic hypersomnia in an 11-year-old female with the unique features of mental deficiency, incontinentia pigmenti, acanthosis nigricans and hereditary multiple exostosis (diaphysial aclasis) is reported. The clinical, Polysomnographic and Multiple Sleep Latency test features of this case with a follow up of seven years are consistent with a diagnosis of periodic (intermittent) excessive somnolence. The unique presentation, however, does differ from Kleine-Levin syndrome and suggests a relationship between the predominantly ectodermal, congenital disorders and the sleep-wake, pattern dysfunction.

Validation of Multiple Sleep Latency Test for the diagnosis of pediatric narcolepsy type 1

Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (11) ◽  
pp. e1034-e1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Pizza ◽  
Lucie Barateau ◽  
Isabelle Jaussent ◽  
Stefano Vandi ◽  
Elena Antelmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Roc Curve ◽  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Sleep Onset ◽  
Biological Data ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency Test ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency

ObjectiveTo validate polysomnographic markers (sleep latency and sleep-onset REM periods [SOREMPs] at the Multiple Sleep Latency Test [MSLT] and nocturnal polysomnography [PSG]) for pediatric narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) against CSF hypocretin-1 (hcrt-1) deficiency and presence of cataplexy, as no criteria are currently validated in children.MethodsClinical, neurophysiologic, and, when available, biological data (HLA-DQB1*06:02 positivity, CSF hcrt-1 levels) of 357 consecutive children below 18 years of age evaluated for suspected narcolepsy were collected. Best MSLT cutoffs were obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis by contrasting among patients with available CSF hcrt-1 assay (n = 228) with vs without CSF hcrt-1 deficiency, and further validated in patients without available CSF hcrt-1 against cataplexy (n = 129).ResultsPatients with CSF hcrt-1 deficiency were best recognized using a mean MSLT sleep latency ≤8.2 minutes (area under the ROC curve of 0.985), or by at least 2 SOREMPs at the MSLT (area under the ROC curve of 0.975), or the combined PSG + MSLT (area under the ROC curve of 0.977). Although specificity and sensitivity of reference MSLT sleep latency ≤8 minutes and ≥2 SOREMPs (nocturnal SOREMP included) was 100% and 94.87%, the combination of MSLT sleep latency and SOREMP counts did not improve diagnostic accuracy. Age or sex also did not significantly influence these results in our pediatric population.ConclusionsAt least 2 SOREMPs or a mean sleep latency ≤8.2 minutes at the MSLT are valid and reliable markers for pediatric NT1 diagnosis, a result contrasting with adult NT1 criteria.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that for children with suspected narcolepsy, polysomnographic and MSLT markers accurately identify those with narcolepsy type 1.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document