Characterizing Hydrocarbon Migration and Fault-seal Integrity in Australia’s Timor Sea via Multiple, Integrated Remote-sensing Technologies

Author(s):  
Geoffrey W. O’Brien ◽  
Robert Cowley ◽  
Paul Quaife ◽  
Michael Morse
1995 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 220 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.W. O'Brien ◽  
E.P. Woods

Within very localised areas of the Vulcan Subbasin, the Eocene Grebe Formation sandstones are strongly cemented with carbonate. These cemented sands are recognisable on seismic data as zones of anomalously high velocity, and result in both time 'pull-up' and deterioration of the stack response in the underlying section.To determine the nature and origin of these cemented zones, their isotopic, mineralogical and petrologic compositions have been characterised, their seismic response and areal distribution established, and these observations integrated with ~2,730 km of AGSO water column geochemical ('sniffer-type') data.The carbon isotopic compositions of the carbonate within the cemented Grebe sands are diagnostic of carbonates formed principally via the oxidation of migrating, thermogenic hydrocarbons. Oxidation of the hydrocarbons took place in two stages: an earlier phase led to calcite precipitation, whereas a later phase produced (generally subsidiary) ferroan dolomite/ankerite cementation.Areas of known, present-day hydrocarbon seepage from the seafloor, such as over major faults on the Skua Horst and along the Vulcan Sub-basin/ Londonderry High boundary zone, are invariably associated with zones of highly cemented Eocene sands. Similarly, areas of known Tertiary hydrocarbon seepage, such as those associated with the residual oil columns on the Eider Horst, also contain strongly cemented Eocene sandstones.These observations have established a causal relationship between the presence of these Hydrocarbon-Related Diagenetic Zones (or HRDZs) in the Eocene sandstones and Tertiary-Quaternary hydrocarbon seepage. It is likely that most of the cementation occurred during the Late Miocene/Early Pliocene, when the Grebe Formation sands were at a shallow depth of burial(Recognition of this causal association has allowed several insights to be gained into the exploration potential and reactivation history of structures within the Vulcan Sub-basin. Mapping of the areal distribution of the cemented zones can effectively define hydrocarbon migration pathways. More importantly, however, predictable relationships exist between the seismic expression of the HRDZs, the total amount of hydrocarbons that have leaked from the traps, and the obliquity between the Jurassic and Late Miocene fault trends over the respective structures. A continuum exists between highintegrity accumulations, in which the fault trends are parallel and the HRDZs are small or absent, and breached accumulations, in which a significant obliquity exists between the respective fault trends and the HRDZs are large and seismically-intense.These observations provide a potential predictive tool for evaluating undrilled structures. It may be possible to determine, from the integration of seismic structural mapping and the characterisation of the seismic expression of the HRDZs, not only whether an individual structure is ever likely to have had a hydrocarbon column, but whether that column is likely to be preserved.


2002 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 187 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.D. Mildren ◽  
R.R. Hillis ◽  
J.Kaldi

Predictions of the likelihood of fault reactivation for five fault-bound prospects in the Timor Sea are made using the FAST (Fault Analysis Seal Technology) technique. Fault reactivation is believed to be the dominant cause of seal breach in the area. Calculations are made using a stress tensor appropriate for the area, a conservative fault-rock failure envelope and the structural geometries of each prospect. A depth-stress power relationship defines the vertical stress magnitude based on vertical stress profiles for 17 Timor Sea wells.Empirical evidence of hydrocarbon leakage at each trap is used to investigate the accuracy of the fault reactivation-based predictions of seal integrity. There is a good correlation between evidence of leakage and the risk of reactivation predicted using the FAST technique. Risk of reactivation is expressed as the pore pressure increase (ΔP) that would be required to induce failure. This study allows the fault reactivation predictions to be calibrated in terms of risk of seal breach. Low integrity traps are associated with ΔP values less than 10 MPa, moderate integrity traps correspond with values between 10 and 15 MPa and high integrity traps correspond with values greater than 15 MPa. Faults with dip magnitudes greater than 60° in the Timor Sea area are likely to have a high risk of reactivation and shear failure is the most likely mode of reactivation.


2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Cowley ◽  
G.W. O'Brien

An extensive volume of 3D seismic data over a number of oil and gas fields in Australia's North West Shelf and Gippsland Basin has been examined for evidence of the effects of hydrocarbon migration and/or leakage. For comparative purposes, 2D and 3D data have also been studied over a number of adjacent traps, including dry traps and partially to completely breached accumulations. Fields and traps investigated include Bayu-Undan, Jabiru, Skua, Swift and Tahbilk in the Bonaparte Basin, Cornea in the Browse Basin, North Rankin, Chinook, Macedon, Enfield and Zeewulf in the Carnarvon Basin, and Kingfish in the Gippsland Basin. The principal goal of the study is to provide representative case studies from known fields so that, in undrilled regions, the exploration uncertainties associated with the issues of hydrocarbon charge and trap integrity might be reduced.Direct indicators of hydrocarbon migration and/or leakage are relatively rare throughout the basins studied, though the discoveries themselves characteristically show seismic anomalies attributable to hydrocarbon leakage. The nature and intensity of these hydrocarbon-related seismic effects do, however, vary dramatically between the fields. Over traps such as Skua, Swift, Tahbilk and Macedon, they are intense, whereas over others, for example Chinook and North Rankin, they are quite subtle. Hydrocarbon-related diagenetic zones (HRDZs), which had been identified previously above the reservoir zones of leaky traps within the Bonaparte Basin, have also been recognised within the Browse, Carnarvon, Otway and Gippsland Basins. HRDZs are the most common leakage indicators found and are identified easily via a combination of high seismic amplitudes through the affected zone, time pull-up and degraded stack response of underlying reflectors. In some cases (the Skua and Macedon Fields), the HRDZs actually define the extent of the accumulations at depth.Anomalous, subtle to strong, seismic amplitude anomalies are associated with the majority of the major fields within the Carnarvon Basin. The strength and location of the anomalies are related to a complex interplay between trap type (in particular four-way dip-closed versus fault dependent), top seal capacity, fault seal integrity, and charge history. In some areas within the Carnarvon, Browse and Bonaparte Basins, shallow amplitude anomalies can be related directly to gas chimneys emanating from the reservoir zone itself. In other instances, the continuous migration of gas from the reservoir has produced an assortment of pockmarks, mounds and amplitude anomalies on the present day sea floor, which all provide evidence of hydrocarbon seepage. In the Browse Basin, strong evidence has been found that many of the modern carbonate banks and reefs in the region were initially located over hydrocarbon seeps on the palaeo-seafloor.The examples and processes presented demonstrate that the analysis of hydrocarbon leakage indicators on seismic data can help to better understand exploration risk and locate subtle hydrocarbon accumulations. In mature exploration provinces, this methodology may lead to the identification of subtle accumulations previously left undetected by more conventional methods. In frontier regions, it can help to identify the presence of a viable petroleum system, typically the principal exploration uncertainty in undrilled regions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 701
Author(s):  
Bozkurt Ciftci ◽  
Laurent Langhi

Top and fault seal failure represents an exploration risk in the Timor Sea where hydrocarbons are typically associated with hourglass structures. These structures comprise two distinct systems of conjugate normal faults that formed by 1st-phase (late Jurassic) and 2nd-phase (Neogene) extensions. Horst blocks bounded by 1st-phase faults potentially trap hydrocarbons and are overlain by grabens bounded by 2nd-phase faults. The two fault systems generally merge and intersect in dip direction to form the composite and time-transgressive faults of the hourglass structures. The 2nd-phase of extension is seen as the dominant cause of the seal breach. Revaluation of a series of hourglass structures on the Laminaria High confirmed two distinct sections of syn-kinematic strata. Bases of these sections correspond to maximum throws on the fault planes where the faults were probably nucleated. The presence of negative throw gradients upward and downward from the throw maximums indicate syn-kinematic deposition and fault growth, respectively. Assessment of these trends suggests that the 1st and 2nd-phase faults were detached at the onset of the 2nd-phase of extension. Connection was predominantly established by down-dip growth of the 2nd-phase faults while the reactivation of the 1st-phase faults may have remained minor. Seismic evidence of leakage from attribute mapping is used to constrain the timing of fault linkage and to validate prediction of leaking fault planes. It was noted that downward propagation of the 2nd-phase faults towards the hydrocarbon traps stresses the top seal integrity due to fault tip deformation front and development of sub-seismic fractures.


1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 138 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.P. Woods

Several structural domains are recognised within the Vulcan Sub-basin, Timor Sea. These domains developed during the Jurassic rifting phase and are separated by major transfer zones which trend in a northwest-southeast direction. Within each domain are frequent third order transfers which sub-divide the main northeast trending fault blocks into numerous compartments. These enable structural hydrocarbon traps to be formed, despite a predominant regional dip. They also affect migration pathways.Jurassic fault styles include detached rotational blocks, salt-associated features, tilted fault blocks and 'hourglass' horsts and grabens. These generally have a northeast-southwest orientation. The transfer faulting complicates these features and forms zones of structural complexity with associated poor seismic data quality. A separate fault episode in the north of the sub-basin during the Tithonian resulted in an east-west fault set overprinting the earlier structuring.Intra-Cretaceous fault movement is also recognised and has an important role in early hydrocarbon entrapment.Structural reactivation during the Late Miocene/Early Pliocene of the earlier fault sets modified the geometry of many existing traps. Numerous new traps may also have formed as a result of this tectonism. In many places the resulting geometry is complex, particularly where the younger fault orientation is at an angle to the main Oxfordian fault set. The late-stage movement is primarily extensional, manifested by predominantly normal faults; overall, however, a varying component of strike slip is likely. A divergent strike-slip zone is recognised at the southwest end of the Cartier Trough.The effects of the late stage tectonism tend to mask the seismic expression of Mesozoic hydrocarbon traps resulting in many wells being drilled off-structure at the target horizon. An understanding of the deeper structuring should result in further discoveries in this prospective basin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document