A Sequence-stratigraphic Study of Mudstone HeterogeneityA Combined Petrographic/Wireline Log Investigation of Upper Jurassic Mudstones from the North Sea (U.K.)

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe H. S. Macquaker ◽  
Clive R. Jones
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Sequence Stratigraphic ◽  
The North ◽  
The North Sea

scholarly journals A revised lithostratigraphy for the Palaeogene – lower Neogene of the Danish North Sea

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Poul Schiøler ◽  
Jan Andsbjerg ◽  
Ole R. Clausen ◽  
Gregers Dam ◽  
Karen Dybkjær ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Energy Agency ◽  
Sequence Stratigraphic ◽  
Oil Companies ◽  
The North ◽  
Reference Sections ◽  
Stratigraphic Model ◽  
Lithostratigraphic Units ◽  
The North Sea ◽  
Stratigraphic Nomenclature

Intense drilling activity following the discovery of the Siri Field in 1995 has resulted in an improved understanding of the siliciclastic Palaeogene succession in the Danish North Sea sector (Fig. 1). Many of the new wells were drilled in the search for oil reservoirs in sand bodies of Paleocene–Eocene age. The existing lithostratigraphy was based on data from a generation of wells that were drilled with deeper stratigraphic targets, with little or no interest in the overlying Palaeogene sediments, and thus did not adequately consider the significance of the Palaeogene sandstone units in the Danish sector. In order to improve the understanding of the distribution, morphology and age of the Palaeogene sediments, in particular the economically important sandstone bodies, a detailed study of this succession in the Danish North Sea has recently been undertaken. An important aim of the project was to update the lithostratigraphic framework on the basis of the new data.The project was carried out at the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) with participants from the University of Aarhus, DONG E&P and Statoil Norway, and was supported by the Danish Energy Agency. Most scientific results cannot be released until September 2006, but a revised lithostratigraphic scheme may be published prior to that date. Formal definition of new units and revision of the lithostratigraphy are in preparation. All of the widespread Palaeogene mudstone units in the North Sea have previously been formally established in Norwegian or British wells, and no reference sections exist in the Danish sector. As the lithology of a stratigraphic unit may vary slightly from one area to another, Danish reference wells have been identified during the present project, and the lithological descriptions of the formations have been expanded to include the appearance of the units in the Danish sector. Many of the sandstone bodies recently discovered in the Danish sector have a limited spatial distribution and were sourced from other areas than their contemporaneous counterparts in the Norwegian and British sectors. These sandstone bodies are therefore defined as new lithostratigraphic units in the Danish sector, and are assigned Danish type and reference sections. There is a high degree of lithological similarity between the Palaeogene–Neogene mudstone succession from Danish offshore boreholes and that from onshore exposures and boreholes, and some of the mudstone units indeed seem identical. However, in order to acknowledge the traditional distinction between offshore and onshore stratigraphic nomenclature, the two sets of nomenclature are kept separate herein. In recent years oil companies operating in the North Sea have developed various in-house lithostratigraphic charts for the Paleocene–Eocene sand and mudstone successions in the Danish and Norwegian sectors. A number of informal lithostratigraphic units have been adopted and widely used. In the present project, these units have been formally defined and described, maintaining their original names whenever feasible, with the aim of providing an unequivocal nomenclature for the Palaeogene – lower Neogene succession in the Danish sector. It has not been the intention to establish a sequence stratigraphic model for this succession in the North Sea; the reader is referred to the comprehensive works of Michelsen (1993), Neal et al. (1994), Mudge & Bujak (1994, 1996a, b), Michelsen et al. (1995, 1998), Danielsen et al. (1997) and Rasmussen (2004).

Mixed-layer kaolinite-illite-vermiculite in North Sea shales

Clay Minerals ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. Sakharov ◽  
H. Lindgreen ◽  
A. L. Salyn ◽  
V. A. Drits
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Coherent Scattering ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
The North ◽  
Dominant Component ◽  
The North Sea ◽  
Xrd Patterns ◽  
Layer Mineral ◽  
Random Alternation

AbstractThe finest fractions of Upper Jurassic shales from the North Sea and onshore Denmark contain 80–90% of an illite-smectite-vermiculite (I-S-V) mixed-layer mineral and, in addition a phase which has X-ray diffraction (XRD) peaks at 7.20–7.26 Å and 3.56–3.58 Å in air- dried and glycolated specimens. This phase may be a fine kaolinite with a small thickness of coherent scattering domains (CSDs) or alternatively a mixed-layer mineral which has kaolinite as the dominant component. For one sample from the Norwegian well 9/4-3, these alternatives are investigated using the multi-specimen method by which agreement between the experimental pattern and the pattern calculated for one and the same structure is obtained for each of several specimens saturated with different cations and with/without glycolation. It is demonstrated that the modelled XRD patterns for a kaolinite-illite-vermiculite (K-I-V) structure having 0.94 kaolinite, 0.03 illite and 0.03 vermiculite layers and random alternation fit the experimental patterns.

scholarly journals Structural traps and seals for expanding CO2 storage in the northern Horda Platform, North Sea

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnathon Osmond ◽  
Mark Mulrooney ◽  
Nora Holden ◽  
Elin Skurtveit ◽  
Jan Inge Faleide ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Co2 Storage ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Lower Jurassic ◽  
Climate Mitigation ◽  
Fault Rock ◽  
Entire Study ◽  
The North ◽  
Major Fault ◽  
The North Sea

The maturation of geological CCS along the Norwegian Continental Shelf is ongoing in the Norwegian North Sea, however, more storage sites are needed to reach climate mitigation goals by 2050. In order to augment the Aurora site and expand CO2 storage in the northern Horda Platform, regional traps and seals must be assessed to better understand the area’s potential. Here, we leverage wellbore and seismic data to map storage aquifers, identify structural traps, and assess possible top and fault seals associated with Lower and Upper Jurassic storage complexes in four major fault blocks. With respect to trap and seal, our results maintain that both prospective intervals represent viable CO2 storage options in various locations of each fault block. Mapping, modeling, and formation pressure analyses indicate that top seals are present across the entire study area, and are sufficiently thick over the majority of structural traps. Across-fault juxtaposition seals are abundant, but dominate the Upper Jurassic storage complexes. Lower Jurassic aquifers, however, are often upthrown against Upper Jurassic aquifers, but apparent across fault pressure differentials and moderate to high shale gouge ratio values correlate, suggesting fault rock membrane seal presence. Zones of aquifer self-juxtaposition, however, are likely areas of poor seal along faults. Overall, our results provide added support that the northern Horda Platform represents a promising location for expanding CO2 storage in the North Sea, carrying the potential to become a future injection hub for CCS in northern Europe.

Tectonostratigraphic framework and depositional history of the Cretaceous–Danian succession of the Danish Central Graben (North Sea) – new light on a mature area

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. S. P. van Buchem ◽  
F. W. H. Smit ◽  
G. J. A. Buijs ◽  
B. Trudgill ◽  
P.-H. Larsen
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Depositional Facies ◽  
Depositional History ◽  
Sequence Stratigraphic ◽  
Stratigraphic Analysis ◽  
The North ◽  
Economic Significance ◽  
History Of ◽  
The North Sea ◽  
Depositional Systems

AbstractAn integrated tectonic and sequence stratigraphic analysis of the Cretaceous and Danian of the Danish Central Graben has led to significant new insights critical for our understanding of the chalk facies as a unique cool-water carbonate system, as well as for the evaluation of its potential remaining economic significance.A major regional unconformity in the middle of the Upper Cretaceous chalk has been dated as being of early Campanian age. It separates two distinctly different basin types: a thermal contraction early post-rift basin (Valanginian–Santonian), which was succeeded by an inversion tectonics-affected basin (Campanian–Danian). The infill patterns for these two basin types are dramatically different as a result of the changing influence of the tectonic, palaeoceanographic and eustatic controlling factors.Several new insights are reported for the Lower Cretaceous: a new depositional model for chalk deposition along the basin margins on shallow shelves, which impacts reservoir quality trends; recognition of a late Aptian long-lasting sea-level lowstand (which hosts lowstand sandstone reservoirs in other parts of the North Sea Basin); and, finally, the observation that Barremian–Aptian sequences can be correlated from the Boreal to the Tethyan domain. In contrast, the Late Cretaceous sedimentation patterns have a strong synsedimentary local tectonic overprint (inversion) that influenced palaeoceanography through the intensification of bottom currents and, as a result, the depositional facies. In this context, four different chalk depositional systems are distinguished in the Chalk Group, with specific palaeogeography, depositional features and sediment composition.The first formalization of the lithostratigraphic subdivision of the Chalk Group in the Danish Central Graben is proposed, as well as an addition to the Cromer Knoll Group.

The Flora Field, Blocks 31/26a, 31/26c, UK North Sea

2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 549-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Hayward ◽  
C. A. L. Martin ◽  
D. Harrison ◽  
G. Van Dort ◽  
S. Guthrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Water Contact ◽  
Upper Carboniferous ◽  
The North ◽  
Recoverable Reserves ◽  
The North Sea ◽  
Oil Water ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Clay Formation

AbstractThe Flora Field straddles Blocks 31/26a and 31/26c of the UK sector of the North Sea on the southern margin of the Central Graben. The field is located on the Grensen Nose, a long-lived structural high, and was discovered by the Amerada Hess operated well 31/26a-12 in mid-1997.The Flora Field accumulation is reservoired within the Flora Sandstone, an Upper Carboniferous fluvial deposit, and a thin Upper Jurassic veneer, trapped within a tilted fault block. Oil is sourced principally from the Kimmeridge Clay Formation of the Central Graben and is sealed by overlying Lower Cretaceous marls and Upper Cretaceous Chalk Group.Reservoir quality is generally good with average net/gross of 85% and porosity of 21%, although permeability (Kh) exhibits a great deal of heterogeneity with a range of 0.1 to <10000mD (average 300 mD). The reservoir suffers both sub-horizontal (floodplain shales) and vertical (faults) compartmentalization, as well as fracturing and a tar mat at the oil-water contact modifying flow and sweep of the reservoir. Expected recoverable reserves currently stand at 13 MMBBL

The Buzzard Field, Blocks 19/5a, 19/10a, 20/1 and 20/6a, UK North Sea

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 691-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. E. Taylor ◽  
N. J. Webb ◽  
C. J. Stevenson ◽  
J. R. Henderson ◽  
A. Kovac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Depositional Model ◽  
Performance Expectations ◽  
North West ◽  
Field Development ◽  
The North ◽  
Moray Firth ◽  
The North Sea ◽  
Clay Formation

AbstractThe Buzzard Field remains the largest UK Continental Shelf oil discovery in the last 25 years. The field is located in the Outer Moray Firth of the North Sea and comprises stacked Upper Jurassic turbidite reservoirs of Late Kimmeridgian–Mid Volgian age, encased within Kimmeridge Clay Formation mudstones. The stratigraphic trap is produced by pinchout of the reservoir layers to the north, west and south. Production commenced in January 2007 and the field has subsequently produced 52% over the estimated reserves at commencement of development, surpassing initial performance expectations. Phase I drilling was completed in 2014 with 38 wells drilled from 36 platform slots. Platform drilling recommenced in 2018, followed in 2019 by Phase II drilling from a new northern manifold location.The evolution of the depositional model has been a key aspect of field development. Integration of production surveillance and dynamic data identified shortcomings in the appraisal depositional model. A sedimentological study based on core reinterpretation created an updated depositional model, which was then integrated with seismic and production data. The new depositional model is better able to explain non-uniform water sweep in the field resulting from a more complex sandbody architecture of stacked channels prograding over underlying lobes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document