Aspects of Rock Physics From Laboratory and Log Data that are Important to Seismic Interpretation1

Author(s):  
A. R. Gregory
2021 ◽  
pp. petgeo2021-016
Author(s):  
K. Bredesen ◽  
M. Lorentzen ◽  
L. Nielsen ◽  
K. Mosegaard

A quantitative seismic interpretation study is presented for the Lower Cretaceous Tuxen reservoir in the Valdemar Field, which is associated with heterogeneous and complex geology. Our objective is to better outline the reservoir quality variations of the Tuxen reservoir across the Valdemar Field. Seismic pre-stack data and well logs from two appraisal wells forms the basis of this study. The workflow used includes seismic and rock physics forward modelling, attribute analysis, a coloured inversion and a Bayesian pre-stack inversion for litho-fluid classification. Based on log data, the rock physics properties of the Tuxen interval reveals that the seismic signal is more governed by porosity than water saturation changes at near-offset (or small-angle). The coloured and Bayesian inversion results were generally consistent with well-log observations at the reservoir level and conformed to interpreted horizons. Although the available data has some limitations and the geological setting is complex, the results implied more promising reservoir quality in some areas than others. Hence, the results may offer useful information for delineating the best reservoir zones for further field development and selecting appropriate production strategies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 556-557
Author(s):  
Yi Shen ◽  
Kui Bao ◽  
Doug Foster ◽  
Dhananjay Kumar ◽  
Kris Innanen ◽  
...  

A one-day postconvention workshop held during the 2018 SEG Annual Meeting in Anaheim, California, focused on seismic attenuation model building and compensation through imaging in the morning and on frequency-dependent seismic interpretation and rock physics in the afternoon. The workshop was organized by Dhananjay Kumar (BP), Yi Shen (Shell), Kui Bao (Shell), Mark Chapman (University of Edinburgh), Doug Foster (The University of Texas at Austin), Wenyi Hu (Advanced Geophysical Tech Inc.), and Tieyuan Zhu (Pennsylvania State University). The main topics discussed were: attenuation and Q model building using seismic, vertical seismic profiling, well-log and core data, seismic attenuation compensation, rock-physics modeling, seismic modeling, and frequency-dependent seismic interpretation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 1229-1230
Author(s):  
Yasir Bashir ◽  
Nordiana Mohd Muztaza ◽  
Nur Azwin Ismail ◽  
Ismail Ahmad Abir ◽  
Andy Anderson Bery ◽  
...  

Seismic data acquired in the field show the subsurface reflectors or horizon among the geological strata, while the seismic inversion converts this reflector information into the acoustic impedance section which shows the layer properties based on lithology. The research aims to predict the porosity to identify the reservoir which is in between the tight layer. So, the output of the seismic inversion is much more batter than the seismic as it is closer to reality such as geology. Seismic inversion is frequently used to determine rock physics properties, for example, acoustic impedance and porosity.


2022 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-54
Author(s):  
Jaime Meléndez Martínez ◽  
Rubén Nicolás López ◽  
Oscar C Valdiviezo

In this work, wet bulk density ?WBD and compressional wave velocity VP core log data obtained along the AND-2A drillcore are plotted on density-velocity ternary mineral Rock Physics Templates (RPTs) built from a Self-Consistent (SC) micromechanics modelling with the purpose to deter- mine data trends that allow us to assist in identifying mineral lithotypes and lithological features throughout the 1138 m length of the drillcore. The elastic properties of the three dominant miner- als present in the drillcore (mixed clays, quartz, and calcite) and the pore-filling fluid (brine) were used as input data for the SC model. The interpreted lithology is then compared to that obtained from the analysis of the AND-2A drillcore ?WBD and VP log data using Gardner type density-velocity cross plots. Results from both the SC and Gardner methods are in good agreement with the main lithologies present in the AND-2A drillcore already reported in the scientific literature. Our findings also agree well when compared to the lithological description of six selected rock samples obtained at different depths on the AND-2A drillcore. These results suggest that the proposed SC approach could be helpful to assist to identify lithology in scientific drill holes where downhole elastic proper- ties may exist over intervals where portions of the drillcore were not recovered. Furthermore, even when elastic property data sets come from measurements on cores, the SC approach is likewise useful because, from visual analysis alone, lithology can sometimes be difficult to determine, and additional information from the analysis of the elastic properties may provide more insight.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. T1057-T1069
Author(s):  
Ritesh Kumar Sharma ◽  
Satinder Chopra ◽  
Larry Lines

The discrimination of fluid content and lithology in a reservoir is important because it has a bearing on reservoir development and its management. Among other things, rock-physics analysis is usually carried out to distinguish between the lithology and fluid components of a reservoir by way of estimating the volume of clay, water saturation, and porosity using seismic data. Although these rock-physics parameters are easy to compute for conventional plays, there are many uncertainties in their estimation for unconventional plays, especially where multiple zones need to be characterized simultaneously. We have evaluated such uncertainties with reference to a data set from the Delaware Basin where the Bone Spring, Wolfcamp, Barnett, and Mississippian Formations are the prospective zones. Attempts at seismic reservoir characterization of these formations have been developed in Part 1 of this paper, where the geologic background of the area of study, the preconditioning of prestack seismic data, well-log correlation, accounting for the temporal and lateral variation in the seismic wavelets, and building of robust low-frequency model for prestack simultaneous impedance inversion were determined. We determine the challenges and the uncertainty in the characterization of the Bone Spring, Wolfcamp, Barnett, and Mississippian sections and explain how we overcame those. In the light of these uncertainties, we decide that any deterministic approach for characterization of the target formations of interest may not be appropriate and we build a case for adopting a robust statistical approach. Making use of neutron porosity and density porosity well-log data in the formations of interest, we determine how the type of shale, volume of shale, effective porosity, and lithoclassification can be carried out. Using the available log data, multimineral analysis was also carried out using a nonlinear optimization approach, which lent support to our facies classification. We then extend this exercise to derived seismic attributes for determination of the lithofacies volumes and their probabilities, together with their correlations with the facies information derived from mud log data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document