The "Carbonate Factory" Revisited: A Reexamination of Sediment Production Functions Used to Model Deposition on Carbonate Platforms

2002 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 849-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. V. Demicco ◽  
L. A. Hardie
Keyword(s):  
Production Functions ◽  
Carbonate Platforms ◽  
Sediment Production ◽  
Carbonate Factory

A general model for growth trajectories of linear carbonate platforms

2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (9) ◽  
pp. 1139-1155
Author(s):  
Nicolas Goudemand ◽  
Pulkit Singh ◽  
Jonathan L. Payne
Keyword(s):  
Growth Trajectories ◽  
Carbonate Platforms ◽  
Seawater Chemistry ◽  
Forward Models ◽  
Sedimentary Deposits ◽  
Sediment Production ◽  
Carbonate Sedimentation ◽  
Platform Margin ◽  
Simple Equations ◽  
Analytical Expressions

ABSTRACT A key challenge regarding development of carbonate platforms is predicting the temporal pattern of platform-margin progradation, aggradation, retrogradation, and drowning. Numerical forward models of carbonate sedimentation have been widely applied to this problem, shedding substantial light on the roles of sediment production, transport, tectonic subsidence, and eustasy on the evolution of carbonate platforms. However, forward models are typically complex and computationally expensive, preventing comprehensive exploration of parameter space. In addition, the interactions among parameters are often nonlinear, preventing the development of simple expressions relating the position of the platform margin to the governing parameters of the model. To complement the considerable insights derived from numerical forward models, this study presents analytical expressions for the temporal evolution of the position of platform margins using the simplest possible assumptions regarding sediment production and transport. These expressions provide useful null models, deviations from which can be used to identify the particular effects of biology or seawater chemistry on carbonate factories in influencing the development of these important sedimentary deposits. Application of the model to synthetic and outcrop examples demonstrates that these simple equations are useful for parameter estimation that can then be used to guide more detailed, process-based numerical forward models.

Can The Ginsburg Model Generate Cycles?

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Schwarzacher
Keyword(s):  
Persian Gulf ◽  
Source Area ◽  
Critical Parameters ◽  
Carbonate Platforms ◽  
The Bahamas ◽  
Source Areas ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Marine Plants ◽  
Marine Source ◽  
Carbonate Factory

The Ginsburg model of carbonate accumulation is an often-quoted mechanism for generating so-called autocycles. It is shown that the model does not represent a self-oscillating system; oscillations can only be generated if at least two critical parameters controlling sedimentation are introduced. The Ginsburg model is a conceptual model which tries to explain the behavior of some carbonate shelves that undergo continuous tectonic subsidence and that carry on their surface a very active carbonate factory. Unfortunately the original model has only been published in abstract form—the relevant part of which is quoted here in full (Ginsburg, 1971, p. 340): . . . "The Florida Bay lagoon and the tidal flats of the Bahamas and Persian Gulf are traps for line sediment produced on the large adjacent open platforms or shelves. The extensive source areas produce carbonate mud by precipitation and by the disintegration of organic skeletons. The carbonate mud moves shoreward by wind-driven, tidal or estuarinelike circulation, and deposition is accelerated and stabilized by marine plants and animals. Because the open marine source areas are many times larger than the nearshore traps, seaward progradation of the wedge of sediments is inevitable. This seaward progradation gives a regressive cycle from open marine shelf or platform to supratidal flat. As the shoreline progrades seaward the size of the open marine source area decreases; eventually reduced production of mud no longer exceeds slow continuous subsidence and a new transgression begins. When the source area expands so that production again exceeds subsidence a new regressive cycle starts.". . . The author is very grateful to Dr. Ginsburg for supplying some additional information that is not obvious from the abstract. The subsidence must be differential and a broad, open shelf that gradually tilts seaward is visualized. All of the sediment produced on the shelf is transported shoreward, where it accumulates as a wedge-shaped deposit that builds into a tidal bank. A further analysis of the model is interesting for two reasons. First, the model has been and still is seriously suggested as a possible mechanism to explain cyclicity on carbonate platforms (see Goldhammer et al, 1987, for references).

ECONOMIC TRUST AS A FACTOR IN PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orest Bonetskyy ◽  
◽  
Roman Zhelizniak ◽  
Vasyl Kashchyshyn ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Production Functions
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document