Comparison of Field and Laboratory VNIR Spectroscopy for Profile Soil Property Estimation

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1503-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongjin Cho ◽  
Alexander H. Sheridan ◽  
Kenneth A. Sudduth ◽  
Kristen S. Veum
Keyword(s):  
Soil Properties ◽  
Water Content ◽  
Bulk Density ◽  
Precision Agriculture ◽  
Soil Property ◽  
Soil Cores ◽  
Estimation Errors ◽  
Vnir Spectroscopy ◽  
Dry Soil

Abstract. In-field, in-situ data collection with soil sensors has potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of soil property estimates. Optical diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) has been used to estimate important soil properties, such as soil carbon, nitrogen, water content, and texture. Most previous work has focused on laboratory-based visible and near-infrared (VNIR) spectroscopy using dried soil. The objective of this research was to compare estimates of laboratory-measured soil properties from a laboratory DRS spectrometer and an in-situ profile DRS spectrometer. Soil cores were obtained to approximately 1 m depth from treatment blocks representing variability in topsoil depth located at the South Farm Research Center of the University of Missouri. Soil cores were split by horizon, and samples were scanned with the laboratory DRS spectrometer in both field-moist and oven-dried conditions. In-situ profile DRS spectrometer scans were obtained at the same sampling locations. Soil properties measured in the laboratory from the cores were bulk density, total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), particulate organic matter carbon and nitrogen (POM-C and POM-N), water content, and texture fractions. The best estimates of TOC, TN, and bulk density were from the laboratory DRS spectra on dry soil (R2 = 0.94, 0.91, and 0.71, respectively). Estimation errors with the field DRS system were at most 25% higher for these soil properties. For POM-C and POM-N, the field system provided estimates of similar accuracy to the best (dry soil) laboratory measurements. Clay and silt texture fraction estimates were most accurate from laboratory DRS spectra on field-moist soil (R2 = 0.91 and 0.93, respectively). Estimation errors for clay and silt were almost doubled with the field DRS system. Considering the efficiency advantages, in-field, in-situ DRS appears to be a viable alternative to laboratory DRS for TOC, TN, POM-C, POM-N, and bulk density estimates, but perhaps not for soil texture estimates. Keywords: In-situ sensing, Precision agriculture, Reflectance spectra, Soil properties, Soil spectroscopy.

Profile Soil Property Estimation Using a VIS-NIR-EC-Force Probe

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 683-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongjin Cho ◽  
Kenneth A. Sudduth ◽  
Scott T. Drummond
Keyword(s):  
Soil Properties ◽  
Water Content ◽  
Bulk Density ◽  
Soil Property ◽  
Soil Strength ◽  
Reflectance Spectra ◽  
Land Resource ◽  
Strength Data ◽  
Soil Sensors ◽  
Combining Data

Abstract. Combining data collected in-field from multiple soil sensors has the potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of soil property estimates. Optical diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) has been used to estimate many important soil properties, such as soil carbon, water content, and texture. Other common soil sensors include penetrometers that measure soil strength and apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) sensors. Previous field research has related these sensor measurements to soil properties such as bulk density, water content, and texture. A commercial instrument that can simultaneously collect reflectance spectra, ECa, and soil strength data is now available. The objective of this research was to relate laboratory-measured soil properties, including bulk density (BD), total organic carbon (TOC), water content (WC), and texture fractions to sensor data from this instrument. At four field sites in mid-Missouri, profile sensor measurements were obtained to 0.9 m depth, followed by collection of soil cores at each site for laboratory measurements. Using only DRS data, BD, TOC, and WC were not well-estimated (R2 = 0.32, 0.67, and 0.40, respectively). Adding ECa and soil strength data provided only a slight improvement in WC estimation (R2 = 0.47) and little to no improvement in BD and TOC estimation. When data were analyzed separately by major land resource area (MLRA), fusion of data from all sensors improved soil texture fraction estimates. The largest improvement compared to reflectance alone was for MLRA 115B, where estimation errors for the various soil properties were reduced by approximately 14% to 26%. This study showed promise for in-field sensor measurement of some soil properties. Additional field data collection and model development are needed for those soil properties for which a combination of data from multiple sensors is required. Keywords: NIR spectroscopy, Precision agriculture, Reflectance spectra, Soil properties, Soil sensing.

scholarly journals Characterizing Soil Physical Properties for Soil Moisture Monitoring with the North Carolina Environment and Climate Observing Network

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 933-943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weinan Pan ◽  
R. P. Boyles ◽  
J. G. White ◽  
J. L. Heitman
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Physical Properties ◽  
Soil Properties ◽  
Water Content ◽  
Bulk Density ◽  
Soil Physical Properties ◽  
The North ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Soil Moisture Monitoring

Abstract Soil moisture has important implications for meteorology, climatology, hydrology, and agriculture. This has led to growing interest in development of in situ soil moisture monitoring networks. Measurement interpretation is severely limited without soil property data. In North Carolina, soil moisture has been monitored since 1999 as a routine parameter in the statewide Environment and Climate Observing Network (ECONet), but with little soils information available for ECONet sites. The objective of this paper is to provide soils data for ECONet development. The authors studied soil physical properties at 27 ECONet sites and generated a database with 13 soil physical parameters, including sand, silt, and clay contents; bulk density; total porosity; saturated hydraulic conductivity; air-dried water content; and water retention at six pressures. Soil properties were highly variable among individual ECONet sites [coefficients of variation (CVs) ranging from 12% to 80%]. This wide range of properties suggests very different behavior among sites with respect to soil moisture. A principal component analysis indicated parameter groupings associated primarily with soil texture, bulk density, and air-dried water content accounted for 80% of the total variance in the dataset. These results suggested that a few specific soil properties could be measured to provide an understanding of differences in sites with respect to major soil properties. The authors also illustrate how the measured soil properties have been used to develop new soil moisture products and data screening for the North Carolina ECONet. The methods, analysis, and results presented here have applications to North Carolina and for other regions with heterogeneous soils where soil moisture monitoring is valuable.

scholarly journals Incorporation of globally available datasets into the roving cosmic-ray neutron probe method for estimating field-scale soil water content

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 3859-3872 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Alexander Avery ◽  
Catherine Finkenbiner ◽  
Trenton E. Franz ◽  
Tiejun Wang ◽  
Anthony L. Nguy-Robertson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organic Carbon ◽  
Soil Organic Carbon ◽  
Water Content ◽  
Bulk Density ◽  
Soil Water Content ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
Soil Bulk Density ◽  
Local Soil ◽  
Calibration Parameters

Abstract. The need for accurate, real-time, reliable, and multi-scale soil water content (SWC) monitoring is critical for a multitude of scientific disciplines trying to understand and predict the Earth's terrestrial energy, water, and nutrient cycles. One promising technique to help meet this demand is fixed and roving cosmic-ray neutron probes (CRNPs). However, the relationship between observed low-energy neutrons and SWC is affected by local soil and vegetation calibration parameters. This effect may be accounted for by a calibration equation based on local soil type and the amount of vegetation. However, determining the calibration parameters for this equation is labor- and time-intensive, thus limiting the full potential of the roving CRNP in large surveys and long transects, or its use in novel environments. In this work, our objective is to develop and test the accuracy of globally available datasets (clay weight percent, soil bulk density, and soil organic carbon) to support the operability of the roving CRNP. Here, we develop a 1 km product of soil lattice water over the continental United States (CONUS) using a database of in situ calibration samples and globally available soil taxonomy and soil texture data. We then test the accuracy of the global dataset in the CONUS using comparisons from 61 in situ samples of clay percent (RMSE  =  5.45 wt %, R2  =  0.68), soil bulk density (RMSE  =  0.173 g cm−3, R2  =  0.203), and soil organic carbon (RMSE  =  1.47 wt %, R2  =  0.175). Next, we conduct an uncertainty analysis of the global soil calibration parameters using a Monte Carlo error propagation analysis (maximum RMSE  ∼  0.035 cm3 cm−3 at a SWC  =  0.40 cm3 cm−3). In terms of vegetation, fast-growing crops (i.e., maize and soybeans), grasslands, and forests contribute to the CRNP signal primarily through the water within their biomass and this signal must be accounted for accurate estimation of SWC. We estimated the biomass water signal by using a vegetation index derived from MODIS imagery as a proxy for standing wet biomass (RMSE  <  1 kg m−2). Lastly, we make recommendations on the design and validation of future roving CRNP experiments.

scholarly journals IN SITU STRENGTH, BULK DENSITY, AND WATER CONTENT RELATIONSHIPS OF A DURINODIC XERIC HAPLOCALCID SOIL

Soil Science ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 166 (8) ◽  
pp. 520-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Sojka ◽  
W. J. Busscher ◽  
G. A. Lehrsch
Keyword(s):  
Water Content ◽  
Bulk Density

Laboratory calibration of different soil moisture sensors in various soil types

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urša Pečan ◽  
Damijana Kastelec ◽  
Marina Pintar
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Water Content ◽  
Bulk Density ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Soil Water Content ◽  
Soil Bulk Density ◽  
Soil Samples ◽  
Soil Types ◽  
Soil Moisture Sensors ◽  
Dry Soil

&lt;p&gt;Measurements of soil water content are particularly useful for irrigation scheduling. In optimal conditions, field data are obtained through a dense grid of soil moisture sensors. Most of the currently used sensors for soil water content measurements, measure relative permittivity, a variable which is mostly dependant on water content in the soil. Spatial variability of soil characteristics, such as soil texture and mineralogy, organic matter content, dry soil bulk density and electric conductivity can also alter measurements with dielectric sensors. So the question arises, whether there is a need for a soil specific calibration of such sensors and is it dependant on the type of sensor? This study evaluated the performance of three soil water content sensors (SM150T, Delta-T Devices Ltd, UK; TRIME-Pico 32, IMKO micromodultechnik GmbH, DE; MVZ 100, Eltratec trade, production and services d.o.o., SI) in nine different soil types in laboratory conditions. Our calibration approach was based on calibration procedure developed for undisturbed soil samples (Holzman et al., 2017). Due to possible micro location variability of soil properties, we used disturbed and homogenized soil samples, which were packed to its original dry soil bulk density. We developed soil specific calibration functions for each sensor and soil type. They ranged from linear to 5&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; order polynomial. We calculated relative and actual differences in sensor derived and gravimetrically determined volumetric soil water content, to evaluate the errors of soil water content measured by sensors which were not calibrated for soil specific characteristics. We observed differences in performance of different sensor types in various soil types. Our results showed measurements conducted with SM150T sensors were within the range of manufacturer specified measuring error in three soil types for which calibration is not necessary but still advisable for improving data quality. In all other cases, soil specific calibration is required to obtain relevant soil moisture data in the field.&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Predicting Profile Soil Properties with Reflectance Spectra via Bayesian Covariate-Assisted External Parameter Orthogonalization

Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 3869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen S. Veum ◽  
Paul A. Parker ◽  
Kenneth A. Sudduth ◽  
Scott H. Holan
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Soil Properties ◽  
Bayesian Modeling ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
External Parameter ◽  
Soil Cores ◽  
Bayesian Lasso ◽  
Modeling Techniques

In situ, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) profile soil sensors have the potential to provide both rapid and high-resolution prediction of multiple soil properties for precision agriculture, soil health assessment, and other applications related to environmental protection and agronomic sustainability. However, the effects of soil moisture, other environmental factors, and artefacts of the in-field spectral data collection process often hamper the utility of in situ DRS data. Various processing and modeling techniques have been developed to overcome these challenges, including external parameter orthogonalization (EPO) transformation of the spectra. In addition, Bayesian modeling approaches may improve prediction over traditional partial least squares (PLS) regression. The objectives of this study were to predict soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and texture fractions using a large, regional dataset of in situ profile DRS spectra and compare the performance of (1) traditional PLS analysis, (2) PLS on EPO-transformed spectra (PLS-EPO), (3) PLS-EPO with the Bayesian Lasso (PLS-EPO-BL), and (4) covariate-assisted PLS-EPO-BL models. In this study, soil cores and in situ profile DRS spectrometer scans were obtained to ~1 m depth from 22 fields across Missouri and Indiana, USA. In the laboratory, soil cores were split by horizon, air-dried, and sieved (<2 mm) for a total of 708 samples. Soil properties were measured and DRS spectra were collected on these air-dried soil samples. The data were randomly split into training (n = 308), testing (n = 200), and EPO calibration (n = 200) sets, and soil textural class was used as the categorical covariate in the Bayesian models. Model performance was evaluated using the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP). For the prediction of soil properties using a model trained on dry spectra and tested on field moist spectra, the PLS-EPO transformation dramatically improved model performance relative to PLS alone, reducing RMSEP by 66% and 53% for SOC and TN, respectively, and by 76%, 91%, and 87% for clay, silt, and sand, respectively. The addition of the Bayesian Lasso further reduced RMSEP by 4–11% across soil properties, and the categorical covariate reduced RMSEP by another 2–9%. Overall, this study illustrates the strength of the combination of EPO spectral transformation paired with Bayesian modeling techniques to overcome environmental factors and in-field data collection artefacts when using in situ DRS data, and highlights the potential for in-field DRS spectroscopy as a tool for rapid, high-resolution prediction of soil properties.

scholarly journals Soil Properties Prediction for Precision Agriculture Using Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Agronomy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Arman Ahmadi ◽  
Mohammad Emami ◽  
Andre Daccache ◽  
Liuyue He
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soil Properties ◽  
Precision Agriculture ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Soil Property ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Reflectance Spectroscopy ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Property Prediction

Reflectance spectroscopy for soil property prediction is a non-invasive, fast, and cost-effective alternative to the standard laboratory analytical procedures. Soil spectroscopy has been under study for decades now with limited application outside research. The recent advancement in precision agriculture and the need for the spatial assessment of soil properties have raised interest in this technique. The performance of soil spectroscopy differs from one site to another depending on the soil’s physical composition and chemical properties but it also depends on the instrumentation, mode of use (in-situ/laboratory), spectral range, and data analysis methods used to correlate reflectance data to soil properties. This paper uses the systematic review procedure developed by the Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation (CEBC) for an evidence-based search of soil property prediction using Visible (V) and Near-InfraRed (NIR) reflectance spectroscopy. Constrained by inclusion criteria and defined methods for literature search and data extraction, a meta-analysis is conducted on 115 articles collated from 30 countries. In addition to the soil properties, findings are also categorized and reported by different aspects like date of publication, journals, countries, employed regression methods, laboratory or in-field conditions, spectra preprocessing methods, samples drying methods, spectroscopy devices, wavelengths, number of sites and samples, and data division into calibration and validation sets. The arithmetic means of the coefficient of determination (R2) over all the reports for different properties ranged from 0.68 to 0.87, with better predictions for carbon and nitrogen content and lower performance for silt and clay. After over 30 years of research on using V-NIR spectroscopy to predict soil properties, this systematic review reveals solid evidence from a literature search that this technology can be relied on as a low-cost and fast alternative for standard methods of soil properties prediction with acceptable accuracy.

scholarly journals Incorporation of globally available datasets into the cosmic-ray neutron probe method for estimating field scale soil water content

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Alexander Avery ◽  
Catherine Finkenbiner ◽  
Trenton E. Franz ◽  
Tiejun Wang ◽  
Anthony L. Nguy-Robertson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organic Carbon ◽  
Soil Organic Carbon ◽  
Water Content ◽  
Bulk Density ◽  
Soil Water Content ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
Soil Bulk Density ◽  
Local Soil ◽  
Calibration Parameters

Abstract. The need for accurate, real-time, reliable, and multi-scale soil water content (SWC) monitoring is critical for a multitude of scientific disciplines trying to understand and predict the earth's terrestrial energy, water, and nutrient cycles. One promising technique to help meet this demand is fixed and roving cosmic-ray neutron probes (CRNP). However, the relationship between observed low-energy neutrons and SWC is affected by local soil and vegetation calibration parameters. This effect may be accounted for by a calibration equation based on local soil type and the amount of standing biomass. However, determining the calibration parameters for this equation is labor and time intensive, thus limiting the full potential of the roving CRNP in large surveys and long transects, or its use in novel environments. In this work, our objective is to develop and test the accuracy of using globally available datasets (clay weight percent, soil bulk density, and soil organic carbon) to support the operability of the CRNP. Here, we develop a 1 km product of soil lattice water over the CONtinental United States (CONUS) using a database of in-situ calibration samples and globally available soil taxonomy and soil texture data. We then test the accuracy of the global dataset in the CONUS using comparisons from 61 in-situ samples of clay percent (RMSE = 5.45 wt. %, R2 = 0.68), soil bulk density (RMSE = 0.173 g/cm3, R2 = 0.203), and soil organic carbon (RMSE = 1.47 wt. %, R2 = 0.175). Next, we conduct an uncertainty analysis of the global soil calibration parameters using a Monte Carlo error propagation analysis (maximum RSME ~0.035 cm3/cm3 at a SWC = 0.40 cm3/cm3). In terms of vegetation, fast growing crops (i.e. maize and soybeans) contribute to the CRNP signal primarily through the water within their biomass and this signal must be minimized for accurate estimation of SWC. We estimated the biomass water signal by using a vegetation index derived from MODIS imagery as a proxy for standing wet biomass (RMSE < 1 kg/m2). Lastly, we make recommendations on the design and validation of future roving CRNP experiments.

scholarly journals Understanding Fields by Remote Sensing: Soil Zoning and Property Mapping

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onur Yuzugullu ◽  
Frank Lorenz ◽  
Peter Fröhlich ◽  
Frank Liebisch
Keyword(s):  
Soil Properties ◽  
Precision Agriculture ◽  
Soil Property ◽  
Clay Content ◽  
Agricultural Systems ◽  
Property Prediction ◽  
High Agreement ◽  
New Era ◽  
Field Management ◽  
Agronomic Yield

Precision agriculture aims to optimize field management to increase agronomic yield, reduce environmental impact, and potentially foster soil carbon sequestration. In 2015, the Copernicus mission, with Sentinel-1 and -2, opened a new era by providing freely available high spatial and temporal resolution satellite data. Since then, many studies have been conducted to understand, monitor and improve agricultural systems. This paper presents results from the SolumScire project, focusing on the prediction of the spatial distribution of soil zones and topsoil properties, such as pH, soil organic matter (SOM) and clay content in agricultural fields through random forest algorithms. For this purpose, samples from 120 fields were investigated. The zoning and soil property prediction has an accuracy greater than 90%. This is supported by a high agreement of the derived zones with farmer’s observations. The trained models revealed a prediction accuracy of 94%, 89% and 96% for pH, SOM and clay content, respectively. The obtained models for soil properties can support precision field management, the improvement of soil sampling and fertilization strategies, and eventually the management of soil properties such as SOM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document