Simple Background Subtraction of Thermal Imagery for Canopy Temperature Measurement in Greenhouse

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-344
Author(s):  
Kendall C DeJonge ◽  
Huihui Huihui Zhang ◽  
Sean M Gleason
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Canopy Temperature ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Crop Water ◽  
Thermal Imagery ◽  
Infrared Thermometry ◽  
Background Temperature ◽  
Homogeneous Background ◽  
Crop Water Stress

Abstract. While infrared thermometry and thermal imagery have potential to detect crop water stress and quantify evapotranspiration, both valuable in irrigation scheduling, it is often difficult to isolate plant canopy temperature from background temperatures. In this study, we demonstrate a simple technique that uses a homogeneous background temperature that contrasts with canopy temperature, thereby allowing the canopy temperature itself to be isolated in a thermal image. Analysis of pixel temperatures and their associated statistics demonstrate the potential of this method to measure small (ca. < 0.5°C) and rapid (ca. < 1 s) fluctuations in leaf energy balance. This technique has broad applicability in greenhouse, growth chamber, and other small-scale experiments where real time response of individual leaves or canopies is required. Keywords: Thermal imaging, Crop water stress, Infrared thermometry, Background masking, Deficit irrigation, Greenhouse.

Assessing canopy temperature-based water stress indices for soybeans under subhumid conditions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Morales Santos ◽  
Reinhard Nolz
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Canopy Temperature ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Stress Index ◽  
Crop Water ◽  
Stress Indices ◽  
Soil Water Status ◽  
Crop Water Stress

<p>Sustainable irrigation water management is expected to accurately meet crop water requirements in order to avoid stress and, consequently, yield reduction, and at the same time avoid losses of water and nutrients due to deep percolation and leaching. Sensors to monitor soil water status and plant water status (in terms of canopy temperature) can help planning irrigation with respect to time and amounts accordingly. The presented study aimed at quantifying and comparing crop water stress of soybeans irrigated by means of different irrigation systems under subhumid conditions.</p><p>The study site was located in Obersiebenbrunn, Lower Austria, about 30 km east of Vienna. The region is characterized by a mean temperature of 10.5°C with increasing trend due to climate change and mean annual precipitation of 550 mm. The investigations covered the vegetation period of soybean in 2018, from planting in April to harvest in September. Measurement data included precipitation, air temperature, relative humidity and wind velocity. The experimental field of 120x120 m<sup>2</sup> has been divided into four sub-areas: a plot of 14x120 m<sup>2</sup> with drip irrigation (DI), 14x120 m<sup>2</sup> without irrigation (NI), 36x120 m<sup>2</sup> with sprinkler irrigation (SI), and 56x120 m<sup>2</sup> irrigated with a hose reel boom with nozzles (BI). A total of 128, 187 and 114 mm of water were applied in three irrigation events in the plots DI, SI and BI, respectively. Soil water content was monitored in 10 cm depth (HydraProbe, Stevens Water) and matric potential was monitored in 20, 40 and 60 cm depth (Watermark, Irrometer). Canopy temperature was measured every 15 minutes using infrared thermometers (IRT; SI-411, Apogee Instruments). The IRTs were installed with an inclination of 45° at 1.8 m height above ground. Canopy temperature-based water stress indices for irrigation scheduling have been successfully applied in arid environments, but their use is limited in humid areas due to low vapor pressure deficit (VPD). To quantify stress in our study, the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) was calculated for each plot and compared to the index resulting from the Degrees Above Canopy Threshold (DACT) method. Unlike the CWSI, the DACT method does not consider VPD to provide a stress index nor requires clear sky conditions. The purpose of the comparison was to revise an alternative method to the CWSI that can be applied in a humid environment.</p><p>CWSI behaved similar for the four sub-areas. As expected, CWSI ≥ 1 during dry periods (representing severe stress) and it decreased considerably after precipitation or irrigation (representing no stress). The plot with overall lower stress was BI, producing the highest yield of the four plots. Results show that DACT may be a more suitable index since all it requires is canopy temperature values and has strong relationship with soil water measurements. Nevertheless, attention must be paid when defining canopy temperature thresholds. Further investigations include the development and test of a decision support system for irrigation scheduling combining both, plant-based and soil water status indicators for water use efficiency analysis.</p>

scholarly journals Data-Driven Models for Canopy Temperature-Based Irrigation Scheduling

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 1579-1592
Author(s):  
Bradely A. King ◽  
Krista C. Shellie ◽  
David D. Tarkalson ◽  
Alexander D. Levin ◽  
Vivek Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Canopy Temperature ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Stress Index ◽  
Wine Grape ◽  
Crop Water ◽  
Crop Water Stress Index ◽  
Water Stress Index ◽  
Crop Water Stress

HighlightsArtificial neural network modeling was used to predict crop water stress index lower reference canopy temperature.Root mean square error of predicted lower reference temperatures was <1.1°C for sugarbeet and Pinot noir wine grape.Energy balance model was used to dynamically predict crop water stress index upper reference canopy temperature.Crop water stress index for sugarbeet was well correlated with irrigation and soil water status.Crop water stress idex was well correlated with midday leaf water potential of wine grape.Abstract. Normalized crop canopy temperature, termed crop water stress index (CWSI), was proposed over 40 years ago as an irrigation management tool but has experienced limited adoption in production agriculture. Development of generalized crop-specific upper and lower reference temperatures is critical for implementation of CWSI-based irrigation scheduling. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate data-driven models for predicting the reference canopy temperatures needed to compute CWSI for sugarbeet and wine grape. Reference canopy temperatures for sugarbeet and wine grape were predicted using machine learning and regression models developed from measured canopy temperatures of sugarbeet, grown in Idaho and Wyoming, and wine grape, grown in Idaho and Oregon, over five years under full and severe deficit irrigation. Lower reference temperatures (TLL) were estimated using neural network models with Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiencies exceeding 0.88 and root mean square error less than 1.1°C. The relationship between TLL minus ambient air temperature and vapor pressure deficit was represented with a linear model that maximized the regression coefficient rather than minimized the sum of squared error. The linear models were used to estimate upper reference temperatures that were nearly double the values reported in previous studies. A daily CWSI, calculated as the average of 15 min CWSI values between 13:00 and 16:00 MDT for sugarbeet and between 13:00 and 15:00 local time for wine grape, were well correlated with irrigation events and amounts. There was a significant (p < 0.001) linear relationship between the daily CWSI and midday leaf water potential of Malbec and Syrah wine grapes, with an R2 of 0.53. The data-driven models developed in this study to estimate reference temperatures enable automated calculation of the CWSI for effective assessment of crop water stress. However, measurements taken under conditions of wet canopy or low solar radiation should be disregarded as they can result in irrational values of the CWSI. Keywords: Canopy temperature, Crop water stress index, Irrigation scheduling, Leaf water potential, Sugarbeet, Wine grape.

Crop water stress index relationship with soybean seed, protein and oil yield under varying irrigation regimes in a Mediterranean environment

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Christos Vamvakoulas ◽  
Ioannis Argyrokastritis ◽  
Panayiota Papastylianou ◽  
Yolanda Papatheohari ◽  
Stavros Alexandris
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Seed Protein ◽  
Soybean Seed ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Stress Index ◽  
Crop Water ◽  
Crop Water Stress Index ◽  
Water Stress Index ◽  
Crop Water Stress

A two-year field experiment was conducted to determine the effect of water stress, including Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI), on seed, protein and oil yields, for two hybrids of drip-irrigated soybean in Central Greece. The experiment was set up as a split plot design with four replicates, five main plots (irrigation treatments) and two sub-plots (soybean hybrids, ‘PR91M10’ and ‘PR92B63’). Irrigation was applied to provide 100, 75, 50 and 25% of the crop evapotranspiration needs and 0% non-irrigated. Biomass weight, seed yield, oil and protein concentration were measured after harvest. To compute CWSI, lower and upper baselines were developed based on the canopy temperature measurements of I100 and I0 treatments, respectively. Deficit irrigation had a significant effect on biomass, seed, protein and oil yields. Hybrid PR92B63 was more responsive to irrigation and showed higher biomass, seed protein and oil yields, while the more sensitive hybrid PR91M10 had the ability to maintain productivity with increasing degrees of water stress. The rain-fed treatments significantly reduced biomass production and seed yield compared with the fully-irrigated ones. The highest and the lowest protein and oil yields were obtained in the I100 and I0 treatments respectively in both years and cultivars. Statistically significant exponential relationships were determined between CWSI and biomass, seed, protein and oil yields. Generally, CWSI could be used to measure crop water status and to improve irrigation scheduling of the crop and 0.10 for PR92B63 and 0.19 for PR91M10 could be offered as threshold values under the climatic conditions of the region.

scholarly journals CROP WATER STRESS INDEX FOR PREDICTING YIELD LOSS IN COMMON BEAN

Irriga ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 687-695
Author(s):  
Carlos Quiloango-Chimarro ◽  
Rubens Duarte Coelho ◽  
Jéfferson de Oliveira Costa ◽  
Rafael Gomez-Arrieta
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Common Bean ◽  
Yield Loss ◽  
Canopy Temperature ◽  
Stress Index ◽  
Crop Water ◽  
Crop Water Stress Index ◽  
Water Stress Index ◽  
Crop Water Stress

The crop water stress index (CWSI), an index derived from canopy temperature, has been widely studied as a physiological indicator of plant water status to optimize irrigation in common beans. However, it is not clear how this index could contribute to yield prediction as a decision support tool in irrigation management. This paper aimed to use the CWSI for predicting yield loss in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) subjected to water stress under drip irrigation. A rain shelter experiment was conducted using a completely randomized design with five replications. The indeterminate growth cultivar TAA Dama was subjected to three irrigation treatments: 100% of the field capacity (FC), 75 and 50% FC from 20 days after sowing (DAS) until the end of the crop cycle. Grain yield was reduced by 42% under 50% FC treatment. Furthermore, stomatal conductance was reduced under this treatment, whereas the CWSI and canopy temperature increased as irrigation levels decreased. The relationship between grain yield and CWSI (R2=0.76, RSME=2.35g) suggests that canopy temperature data could be used to forecast grain yield losses. In conclusion, farmers can have a low-cost, effective technique for making water management decisions in common bean.

scholarly journals Evaluation of yield, quality and crop water stress index of sugar beet under different irrigation regimes

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 571-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omid Bahmani ◽  
Ali Akbar Sabziparvar ◽  
Rezvan Khosravi
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Irrigation Scheduling ◽  
Sugar Yield ◽  
Stress Index ◽  
Crop Water ◽  
Crop Water Stress Index ◽  
Water Stress Index ◽  
Yield Quality ◽  
Crop Water Stress

This study was carried out to evaluate the use of the crop water stress index (CWSI) for irrigation scheduling of sugar beet for two years under the semi arid climate of Iran. Statistical relationships between CWSI and yield, quality parameters and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) were investigated. Irrigations were scheduled based on 100 (I100), 85 (I85), 70 (I50) and 0% (I0) of plant water requirement. CWSI values were calculated from the measurements of canopy temperatures by infrared thermometer, air temperatures and vapor pressure deficit values for all the irrigated treatments. The highest IWUE was found in I70 with 9.16 and 1.66 kg m−3 for the root and sugar yield, respectively, in 2013. A non-water stressed baseline (lower line) equation for sugar beet was measured from full irrigated plots as (Tc − Ta)ll = −0.832VPD + 2.1811; R2 = 0.6508. There was a high determination coefficient between CWSI with the root and sugar yield and IWUE. The CWSI could be used to determine the irrigation time of sugar beet, and 0.3 could be offered as a threshold value. Results indicated that the CWSI can be used to evaluate crop water stress and improve irrigation scheduling for sugar beet under semiarid conditions.

scholarly journals Determination of Crop Water Stress Index by Infrared Thermometry in Grapefruit Trees Irrigated with Saline Reclaimed Water Combined with Deficit Irrigation

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Romero-Trigueros ◽  
José María Bayona Gambín ◽  
Pedro Antonio Nortes Tortosa ◽  
Juan José Alarcón Cabañero ◽  
Emilio Nicolás Nicolás
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Reclaimed Water ◽  
Stress Index ◽  
Crop Water ◽  
Crop Water Stress Index ◽  
Infrared Thermometry ◽  
Water Stress Index ◽  
Thermal Indicators ◽  
Crop Water Stress

Water is not always accessible for agriculture due to its scarcity. In order to successfully develop irrigation strategies that optimize water productivity characterization of the plant, the water status is necessary. We assessed the suitability of thermal indicators by infrared thermometry (IRT) to determine the water status of grapefruit in a commercial orchard with long term irrigation using saline reclaimed water (RW) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) in Southeastern Spain. The results showed that Tc-Ta differences were positive in a wide range of vapor pressure deficits (VPD), and the major Tc-Ta were found at 10.00 GMT, before and after the highest daily values of VPD and solar radiation, respectively, were reached. In addition, we evaluated the relationships between Tc-Ta and VPD to establish the Non-Water Stressed Baselines (NWSBs), which are necessary to accurately calculate the crop water stress index (CWSI). Two important findings were found, which include i) the best significant correlations (p < 0.005) found at 10.00 GMT and their slopes were positive, and ii) NWSBs showed a marked hourly and seasonal variation. The hourly shift was mainly explained by the variation in solar radiation since both the NWSB-slope and the NWSB-intercept were significantly correlated with a zenith solar angle (θZ) (p < 0.005). The intercept was greater when θZ was close to 0 (at midday) and the slope displayed a marked hysteresis throughout the day, increasing in the morning and decreasing in the afternoon. The NWSBs determination, according to the season improved most of their correlation coefficients. In addition, the relationship significance of Tc-Ta versus VPD was higher in the period where the intercept and Tc-Ta were low. CWSI was the thermal indicator that showed the highest level of agreement with the stem water potential of the different treatments even though Tc and Tc-Ta were also significantly correlated. We highlight the suitability of thermal indicators measured by IRT to determine the water status of grapefruits under saline (RW) and water stress (RDI) conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document