Ammonia Volatilization from Turkey Litter Application in a Pine Plantation in South Carolina

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Montes ◽  
John P. Chastain
1995 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.H. Van Lear ◽  
P.R. Kapeluck

Above- and below-stump biomass and nutrient content were estimated for a mature loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.) plantation on an eroded site in the upper Piedmont of South Carolina. Pine above-stump biomass was 144.9 t•ha−1; below-stump biomass was 36.0 t•ha−1, 20% of total pine biomass. Total pine biomass was partitioned as 17% crown, 63% stem, and 20% roots. About 55% of below-stump biomass was in taproots and 45% in lateral roots. Dominant and codominant trees had a greater proportion of below-stump biomass in lateral roots, indicating that larger trees absorb a disproportionate quantity of the site's moisture and nutrients. Lateral roots contained 66 to 75% of below-stump nutrients. Fine roots (<0.6 cm diameter) accounted for 11% of below-stump biomass, but contained 24 to 30% of below-stump nutrients. Nutrient content (kg•ha−1) of above-stump biomass ranked as follows: N 164.7, Ca 154.2, K 78.0, and P 14.0. Nitrogen was also the most abundant nutrient in below-stump biomass (60.2 kg•ha−1), followed by Ca (48.9 kg•ha−1), K (41.2 kg•ha−1), Mg (11.1 kg•ha−1), and P (7.5 kg•ha−1). Below-stump biomass contained 27, 35, 35, and 24% of total pine N, P, K, and Ca, respectively. Fine roots and foliage, only 4% of total stand biomass, had about one-fourth of the stand's N and P.


1990 ◽  
Vol 50 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 301-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Amundson ◽  
A. J. Belsky ◽  
R. C. Dickie

Author(s):  
J. T. Ellzey ◽  
D. Borunda ◽  
B. P. Stewart

Genetically alcohol deficient deer mice (ADHN/ADHN) (obtained from the Peromyscus Genetic Stock Center, Univ. of South Carolina) lack hepatic cytosolic alcohol dehydrogenase. In order to determine if these deer mice would provide a model system for an ultrastructural study of the effects of ethanol on hepatocyte organelles, 75 micrographs of ADH+ adult male deer mice (n=5) were compared with 75 micrographs of ADH− adult male deer mice (n=5). A morphometric analysis of mitochondrial and peroxisomal parameters was undertaken.The livers were perfused with 0.1M HEPES buffer followed by 0.25% glutaraldehyde and 2% sucrose in 0.1M HEPES buffer (4C), removed, weighed and fixed by immersion in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, followed by a 3,3’ diaminobenzidine (DAB) incubation, postfixation with 2% OsO4, en bloc staining with 1% uranyl acetate in 0.025M maleate-NaOH buffer, dehydrated, embedded in Poly/Bed 812-BDMA epon resin, sectioned and poststained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Photographs were taken on a Zeiss EM-10 transmission electron microscope, scanned with a Howtek personal color scanner, analyzed with OPTIMAS 4.02 software on a Gateway2000 4DX2-66V personal computer and stored in Excel 4.0.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
Jenny Walker

Abstract The AMAGuides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) is the most widely used basis for determining impairment and is used in state workers’ compensation systems, federal systems, automobile casualty, and personal injury, as well as by the majority of state workers’ compensation jurisdictions. Two tables summarize the edition of the AMA Guides used and provide information by state. The fifth edition (2000) is the most commonly used edition: California, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, New Hampshire, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Vermont, and Washington. Eleven states use the sixth edition (2007): Alaska, Arizona, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Wyoming. Eight states still commonly make use of the fourth edition (1993): Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, South Dakota, Texas, and West Virginia. Two states use the Third Edition, Revised (1990): Colorado and Oregon. Connecticut does not stipulate which edition of the AMA Guides to use. Six states use their own state specific guidelines (Florida, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, and Wisconsin), and six states do not specify a specific guideline (Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Virginia). Statutes may or may not specify which edition of the AMA Guides to use. Some states use their own guidelines for specific problems and use the Guides for other issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document